that what we did -- we made a series of decisions in '93 -- actually '94-'95 time frame that reed hundt made a speech about. there were five decisions critical about wireless. a few of them were great, a few of them we would look at them and say maybe they were great, maybe not so much, but fundamentally laid the foundation for a very competitive, dynamic, innovative wireless market that we've really enjoyed the fruits of in this country. and i think that, you know, making sure that there is a competitive market is far more important than whatever conditions you could put on that you then have to enforce. now, at&t would make the argument there is sufficient competition, so i'm not opining on that question. i'm just saying that if you are depending on enforcement actions, it's a much tougher road. i do think, and i think it was very interesting that verizon picked up on this, that one of the concerns kwr0ud have about -- you'd have about a merger is does that inevitably lead to the need for more regulation? i think that's one of the questions that the department of justice will grapple