end of these agreed upon time period then you are either at risk of being listed at the credit reference bureau which is a lot like blacklisting you for not paying up in loans all right well a pretty tricky situation there and of course we know that there are 49 different credit apps are they all legit. yes at the moment they're registered 49 are legit but these are challenges because they're not regulated and with this it means that consumer data protection is is not guaranteed what this means is that these mobile lenders how the right to dig into your brussel information because when you're signing up for these loans part of the argument is to give up your don't organize not details like you g.p.s. location your social media accounts and also your call s.m.s. logs on your mobile phone so when you do full it these mobile lenders also dig into your call logs and call some of the people that you close to and as arrives to tell you to pay up you're not ok thank you very ranging wants gary situation and their joy during their reporting from nairobi thank you so much. and 2800 wonder banned the imp

end of these agreed upon time period then you are either at risk of being listed at the credit reference bureau which is like blacklisting you for not paying up you know all right well a pretty tricky situation there and of course we know that there are $49.00 different credit apps are they all legit. yes at the moment they're registered 49 are legit but these are challenges because they're not regulated and with this it means that consumer data protection is is not guaranteed what this means is that these mobile landon's how the right to dig into your bustling information because when you're signing up for these small loans part of the argument is to give up your past when you don't organize not details like you g.p.s. location your social media accounts and also your call s.m.s. logs on your mobile phone so when you do full it these mobile lenders also dig into your call logs and call some of the people that you close to and our right to tell you to pay up you're not ok gary ranging wants carry situation and their joy during their reporting from nairobi thank you so much. and 2800 wonder bann

possible role in 911 by the saudis as well investigates and michael jacobson came across a stray reference to a bureau informant in san diego who had known one of the hijackers bob graham the former chairman of the senate intelligence committee said that robert mueller made the strongest objections to jacobson and his colleagues visiting san diego 18 years on many americans have lots of questions about 911 what forces could have conspired along with the hijackers and it seems like a lot of these very legitimate questions have not been answered. r.t. new york we spoke to a former f.b.i. agent who was active during investigations into 911 she says failures in the process led to policy decisions that have only caused more suffering. if they had gone through the truth about how the 911 attacks had occurred and how all these failures to share information to even read information if they had done that within a couple of months and i'm sure most of the agents would have told the truth of the the war in iraq for instance were not have been launched there probably would have been no guantanamo no torture no ro

number refers there to -- well, actually the i.d. number is a number the bureau assigns to it but not the commission. but the answer is yes, two separate matters. >> any other questions from commissioners? i'll call for public comment on agenda item number 10. any public comment -- i'm sorry, on agenda item number 12. okay. no public comment. okay. we'll now move to agenda item number 10, discussion and possible action on enforcement process improvements review. >> thank you, chair and commissioners. so item 10, we're pleased to bring this to you today. this has been in development for some time and we're glad that each of you could join for this discussion because we covet your feedback, your guidance, your direction on the particular proposals that we're bringing for you today. just as a reminder, item 10 comes before you essentially at the request of chair chu who requested that staff prepare a presentation about information regarding the existing case load and certain proposals that staff might bring about how to prioritize the commission's enforcement resour

. >> it was referred to the federal bureau of investigation. >> reporter: "the new york times" reports whistle-blower is a cia officer. republicans noted that this person by his or her own admission was not a direct witness to most of the events described. >> the whistle-blower tells us the officials that i spoke with told me and i was told that and white house officials told me that. in other words, all of this is second-hand information. >> reporter: but the acting director of national intelligence, chosen by the president himself, says some key details do check out. >> i would say that the whistle-blower's complaint is in alignment with what was released yesterday by the president. >> then why, director, when the president called the whistle-blower a political hack and suggested that he or she might be disloyal to the country, why did you remain silent? >> i did not remain silent, mr. chairman. >> it's a sad week for our country. >> reporter: house speaker nancy pelosi told scott pelley of "60 minutes" that this incident is now the primary focus of the house impeachment inquiry. >>

the icig and the justice department referred to the federal bureau of investigation for investigation. so that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed. so that it can then be forwarded. it was not stonewalling. i didn't receive direction from anybody. i was just trying to work through the process and the law the way that it is written. i have to comply with the way the law is, not way some people would like to be. and if i could do otherwise, it would have been much more convenient for me, congressman. >> and lastly, director, as you sit here today, sir, codo you commit to providing every single whistleblower complaint intended for congress to the intelligence community that is required by the statute, sir? >> if it is required by the statute, congressman, yes, i will. >> that is good to know, sir. and i certainly hope so because i think that the unprecedented decision to withhold this whistleblower complaint from congress, i think it raises serious concerns for us and for me and i think that we need to get to the bottom of this. i yield t

ig and the justice department referred it to the bureau of investigation for investigation. that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed. didas not stonewalling, i not receive direction from anybody. i was just trying to work through the process and the law the way it was written. i have to comply with the way that the law is, not the way some people would like it to be. if i could do otherwise, it would've been more convenient for me, congressman. rep. carson: lastly, as you sit here today, do you commit to providing every single whistleblower complaint intended to congress to the statute? director maguire: if it is required, i will. rep. carson: i certainly hope so, because i think the decision to withhold this complaint from congress, it raises concerns, serious concerns for us, and me. and, i think we need to get the bottom -- get to the bottom of this. i yield the balance of my time. >> how much time does the gentleman have remaining? twentysomething? director, you were not directed to withhold the complaint, is that your te

again, it wasonce referred to the federal bureau of investigation. >> not by the president. dir. maguire: no. .y this office said anyor wray candidate or elected official so it -- should immediately report it. the person involved did not do .hat director wray should occur >> mr. welch. >> thank you. director, i want to say thank you. there is no one in this room who can claim to have served their country longer and more valiantly than you. remarksin your opening that your family before you has been committed to this country. i say thank you. second, i appreciated your candor when in your opening statement you acknowledged the whistleblower acted in good faith. third, i appreciated your acknowledgment that the inspector general also acted in good faith and according to his view of the laws. i want to say this. when you said you are in a unique position, that is an understatement. you got a complaint involving the president of the united states and also the united states attorney general. i disagree with some of the decisions you made, but i have no doubt whatsoever that the same s

. >> once again, its was referred to the federal bureau of investigation -- >> not by the president. >> by this office. >> right. >> and by the aifs of -- >> director rey said any official should immediately report it. he didn't say the director of o & i should report it. although you did and you should. thank you. but the person involved did not do what director rey said should occur, period. >> thank you, congressman. >> mr. welsh. >> director, i want to say thank you. there is nobody in this room who can claim to have served the country longer than you and your remarks about your family before you has been committed to this country. and i say thank you. second, i appreciate your kandzer when in your opening statement you acknowledge that the whistle-blower acted in good faith. when you say you're in a unique position, that's an understatement. you got a complaint regarding the president of the united states and the united states attorney general. i disagree with some of the decisions you made, but i have no doubt whatsoever that the same sense of duty that you applied in your long

. >> once again, it was referred to the federal bureau of investigation. >> not by the president. >> no, by this office. >> right. >> and by the office of -- by the icig. >> director wray said any candidate or elected official should immediately report it. he didn't say that the director of oni should report it although you should and you did, thank you. but the person involved did not do what director wray said should occur, period. >> thank you, congressman. >> thank you, sir. >> mr. welch. >> thank you. director, i want to say thank you. there's nobody in this room who can claim to have served their country longer and more valiantly than you. i heard in your opening remarks that your family before you has been committed to this country, and i say thank you. second, i appreciated your candor when in your opening statement you acknowledged that the whistle-blower acted in good faith. third, i appreciated your acknowledgment that the inspector general also acted in good faith and according to his view of the law. i want to say this. when you say you're in a unique position, that's an

and director go ahead feel free to i'd respond once again it was referred to the federal bureau of investigation not by the president no by the by this office right and by the office of only by the i.c. i director raise said that any candidate or elected official should immediately report it he didn't say that the director of all and i should read reported although you should and you did a thank you but the person involved did not do what director spray said should occur period thank you congressman thank you mr welch thank you director i want to say thank you there's nobody in this room who can claim to have served their country longer and more valid valiantly and you and i heard in your opening remarks that your family before you has been committed to this country and i say thank you. second i appreciate your candor when in your opening statement you acknowledge that the whistleblower acted in good faith. and 3rd i appreciated your acknowledgment that the inspector general also acted in good faith and according to his view of the law. and i want to say this when you said you're an antique a un

i would probably, in addition to that, have advised them to refer to the central permit bureau to do the checking of who we give our permits to, who applies to them, because if you come in -- if i obtained a permit for something else -- from someone else, i have to have authorization for that permit from that person. there are checks and that is done right before permit issuance. if we did do something in error and we were misled, we would look into that and possibly revoke the permit if it was issued in error, were from what i see, they did provide documentation to someone at d.b.i., so at this point, i would say that the permit is valid, unless they can provide us with some documentation that it is not. it could be, indeed a civil issue as mr. sanchez said. we could ask our city attorney for an opinion on it. as for d.b.i., we also have -- there are several city attorneys that work with d.b.i. sometimes we have to go to them for an opinion on this, as well, just because the city could be party do something later on, but for now, i would say the permit is valid, i think. >> just so

that report you referred to from the census bureau also found that there are more and more americansuickest ways for americans to lose their economic prowess or the economic gains is not having health insurance and getting sick and having to go to the hospital and deal with the monstrosity of the hospital bill. >> mike: all right, take a look at this from "the washington post," lisa. historically strong economic numbers have meant positive results for the incumbent president a pessimist party but then strong economic numbers have you also usually meant not getting blown out in midterm elections and thanks in large part to mr. trump's low approval numbers, that's exactly what happened in november. lisa, how how do you respond? >> well, there's no doubt that we've seen great strides under this economy under the president's leadership, but most important, we are going out and we are talking to voters in my district here in nevada and we are hearing from them and everyone is very, very optimistic about what the future will hold under this type of leadership and the numbers that we are al

once >> again, it's referred to the federal bureau of investigation -- >> not by the president. >> by this office and by the office and by the icig. >> director wray said that any candidate or like the official should immediately report it and didn't say that the director should reported although you should and you did and thank you. but the person involved did not do what director wray said should occur, period. >> thank you congressman. >> mr. wells. >> director, i want to say thank you there. is nobody in this room who can claim to have served their country longer and more valiantly than you. i have heard in your opening remarks that your family is before you and has committed to this country and i say thank you. second, i appreciate your candor and in your opening statement you acknowledge that the whistleblower act in faith and third i, appreciate your acknowledgment that the inspector general also acted in good faith and according to the view of the law. i want to say this. when you said you were in a unique position that's an understatement. you have a complaint involving the p

director maguire: once again, it was referred to the federal bureau of investigation. representative: not by the president. director maguire: by this office and by the office of the icig. representative: director wray said any candidate or official should immediately report it. he didn't say the director of dni should reported, although you did, and thank you, but the person involved did not do what director wray said they should. period. representative welch: director, thank you. there is nobody in this room who can claim to have served the country longer and more valiantly than you. and in your opening remarks, your family before you has committed -- has been committed to this country. i say thank you. i appreciated your candor in your opening statement when, and your opening statement, you acknowledged the whistleblower acted in good faith. and third, i appreciated your acknowledgment that the inspector general also acted in good faith according to his view of the law. i want to say this. when you said you are in a unique position, that is an understatement. you hav

the icig and the justice department referred it to the federal bureau of investigation for investigation. so this -- and that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed so that it can then be forwarded. it was not stonewalling. i didn't receive direction from anybody. i was just trying to work through the process and the law the way it is written. i have to comply with the way the law is, not the way some people would like it to be. and if i could do otherwise, it would have been much more convenient for me, congressman. >> and lastly, director, as you sit here today, sir, do you commit to providing every single whistleblower complaint intended for congress to the intelligence committee as required by the statute, sir? >> if it's required by the statute congressman carson, yes, i will. >> that's good to know, sir. i certainly hope so, because i think the unprecedented decision to withhold this whistleblower complaint from congress i think it raises concerns very serious concerns for us and for me, and i think that we need to get to the bottom of

and the justice department referred it to the federal bureau of investigation for investigation so this is nothing and that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed so that it can then be forwarded it was not stonewalling i didn't receive direction from anybody i was just trying to work through the process and the law the way it is written i have to comply with the way the law is not the way some people would like it to be and if i could could do otherwise it would have been much more convenient for me congressman. and lastly director as you sit here today sir do you commit to providing every single whistleblower complaint intended for congress to the intelligence committees as required by the statutes or if it's required by the statute congressman carson yes i will. as good to know sir and i certainly hope so because i think the unprecedented decision to withhold this will complain from congress i think it raises concerns very serious concerns for us and for me. and i think that we need to get to the bottom of this i yield the balance of my

. >> once again, it was referred to the federal bureau of investigation -- >> not by the president. >> no. by the -- by this office -- >> right. >> -- and by the office of -- and by the icig. >> director wray said that any candidate or elected official should immediately report it. he didn't say that the director of oni should report it although you should and did, thank you. but the person involved did not do what director wray should occur, period. >> thank you, congressman. >> thank you, sir. >>> mr. welch. >> thank you. director, i want to say thank you. there's nobody in this room who can claim to have served our country longer and more valiantly than you. i heard in your opening remarks that your family before you has been committed to this country. and i say, thank you. second, i appreciated your candor when -- in your opening statement you acknowledge that the whistle-blower acted in good faith. and third, i appreciated your acknowledgement that the inspector general also acted in good faith and according to his view of the law. and i want to say this. when you said you were i

the icig and the justice department referred it to the federal bureau of investigation for investigation. so this -- that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed so that it can then be forwarded. it was not stonewalling. i didn't receive direction from anybody. i was just trying to work through process and the law the way it is written. i have to comply with the way the law is, not the way some people would like it to be. if i could do otherwise, it would have been much more convenient for me, congressman. >> and lastly, director, as you sit here today, sir, do you commit to providing every single whistle-blower complaint intended to congress to the intelligence committee required by the statute. >> if it's required by the statute, yes, i will. >> that's good to know, sir. i certainly hope so. because i think the unprecedented decision to withhold this complaint from congress, i think it raises concerns, very serious concerns for us and for me. and i think that we need to get to the bottom of this. i yield the balance of my time. thank you. >

the icig and the justice department referred it to the federal bureau of investigation foor investigation. so this is -- that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed. so that it can then be forwarded. it was not stonewalling. i didn't receive direction from anybody. i was just trying to work through the process and the law the way it is written. i have to comply with the way the law is not the way some people would like it to be. and if i could do otherwise, it would have been much more convenient for me, congressman. >> and lastly, director, as you sit here today, sir, do you commit to providing every single whistle-blower complaint intended for congress to the intelligence committees as required by the statute, sir. >> if it's required by the statute congressman carson, yes i will. >> that's good to know, sir. and i certainly hope so because i think the unprecedented decision to withheld this whistle-blower complaint from congress i think it raises concerns very serious concerns for us and for me. and i think that with we need to get to the

. >> once again, it was referred to the federal bureau of investigation. >> not by the president. >> no. by this office. >> right. >> and by the office of -- by the icig. >> director wray said that any candidate or elected official should immediately report it. he didn't say that the director of oni should report it but the person did not do what director wray said should occur, period. >> thank you, congressman. >> thank you, sir. >> mr. welch. >> thank you. director, i want to say thank you. there's nobody in this room who can claim to have served their country longer and more valiantly than you, and i heard in your opening remarks that your family before you has been committed to this country, and i say thank you. second, i appreciated your candor when, in your opening statement, you acknowledged that the whistle-blower acted in good faith. and third, i appreciated your acknowledgment that the inspector general also acted in good faith and according to his view of the law. i want to say this, when you said you were in a unique position, that's an understatement. you got a complain

the icig and the justice department referred it to the federal bureau of investigation for investigation. that was working while i was endeavoring to get the executive privilege concerns addressed so that it can then be forwarded. it was not stonewalling. i didn't receive direction from anybody. i was just trying to work through the process and the law the way it is written. i have to comply with the way the law is, not the way some people would like it to be. and if i could do otherwise, it would have been much more convenient for me, congressman. >> and lastly, director, as you sit here today, sir, do you commit to providing every single whistleblower complaint intended for congress as required by the statute, sir? >> if it's required by the statute, yes, i will. >> i certainly hope so because i think the unprecedented decision to withhold this whistleblower complaint from congress, i think it raises concerns, very serious concerns for us and for me. and i think that we need to get to the bottom of this. i yield the balance of my time, chairman. thank you. >> how much time does the gen

bureau quarter that speaks to the audit process. there are three systems that are audited. the three systems are as follows. the california law enforcement telecommunications system, which is commonly referred to as plots, department e-mail system, and finally text messaging via department issued cellular phones. i will explain how each of these systems are audited and results -- and results of the second quarter for 2019. first, the program was established with searches all entries to the system using an established word list. the audit process is passive in nature and runs continuously. if a member uses one of the identified words, a hit is generated automatically and sends personnel to access the portal. each hit is printed, scanned, and saved to a file. staff analyse his every hit throughout the week, at those determined to be potentially biased are investigated. it has been fully operational since december of 2016. from april 1st through june 30th, there were six hits returned from the program, and after review by members, known -- none of the six hits were determined to be bias based. secondly, department e-mail. all e-mails sent and received internally and externally through the depa