regretly, president obama is avoiding discussion of a compelling strategy with which to deal with a graelter enemy, one that in my opinion is more deserving of a presidential prime time speech than the islamic state. i know that's not popular with your viewers or many of the american people for me to say that. i truly believe that enemy is iran. here's what former secretary of state henry kissinger also said about the islamic state. from a geo strategic point of view, i consider iran a bigger problem than isis. isis has to conquer more and more territory before they can become a geo strategic permanent reality. i think a conflict with isis, important as it is, is more manageable than a confrontation with iran. and that may be the problem. mr. obama's strategy is too convenient. it is too supportive of his obvious preferences for ambiguous outcomes when it comes to iran. remember, this president believes he can talk and reason and negotiate successfully with iran, although he hasn't done so to date. whether on the issue of nuclear weapons or the syrian future, he proposes the united states de