we have this story with reid schar. i guess we can get to that. this statement from christie's camp last night going after wildstein, digging up stories about wildstein in high school, this was supposed to be -- remember at the press conference a few weeks ago, christie said how little he knew of him in high school. now he wants to attack him and all he can talk about is high school. >> this is very dangerous, steve. this is very, very dangerous for the christie administration. he is essentially at that news conference three weeks ago or so threw his people under the bus, talked about them lying to him, that sort of thing. what he's doing now in going after wildstein, is he is telling all of these people who were in his employ that he's not standing by them and he's doing it in a very aggressive way. i mean, yes, the news conference was aggressive enough. now it's going beyond throwing them off the bus, it's getting in the driver's seat and riding right over them. that's what we see in this e-mail. of course, when you get hit by a bus, if you can

>> well, i think reid schar, a former u.s.y out of chicago has a very good understanding of how they're going to operate. and as a consequence, what we need to do to make sure we're not impeding or interfering with their investigation in any way. he's very confident in the way that we're proceeding. he's not interfering with anything that they've got planned. and we're going to continue to seek his advice and counsel as we move forward, but obviously we do not want to do anything that's going to impede a federal law enforcement investigation into any aspect, whether it's the bridge or any other issue. >> i know that you are still reviewing and still receiving documents related to the last round of subpoenas -- >> thousands of pages. >> are they still -- do you know when you will have them all? in terms of what extensions people have asked for? >> i think that we'll know at some point. we're getting documents produced on a rolling basis. >> uh-huh. >> so every couple days we'll get some more in. so it's hard for me to say now t

>> one of the surprises over the weekend is reid schar, met with the u.s.attorney, paul fishman, basically walked away from the meeting saying we have the green light to go forward and continue this investigation. that was a surprise to a number of people in trenton. they felt the u.s. attorney was going to basically say, hey, you know, we got this one, there's going to be overlapping issues here. the overlapping issues are going to allow, for instance, bridget kelly to, you know, say, you know, i can't be subpoenaed twice for the same information for the sake of clarity. the expectation was that that was going to happen. certain people said when chris christie was u.s. attorney if there was a situation like that, there's a little doubt chris christie would have stepped in and said, hey, get out of the way. >> this is mine. yeah. >> again, i was talking to somebody in trenton tonight who said, look, you have a situation where people are starting to claim the fifth amendment. you ran through who so far is refusing to cooperate. extensions for a number of peo

first, a statement from reid schar, the former federal prosecutor brought in by the state legislative committee investigating the bridge affair. that legislative committee has issued subpoenas including 20 which are due back tomorrow. but its immediate future in

. >> reid schar, special counsel, reportedly has seen what's beneath these redactions.he seen them and what does that mean about whether you're going to see them and whether or not the public will? >> it's a process that counsel worked out with one another. we wanted to see them from that day. you showed the clip where he was first at the committee meeting and we wanted to see them. so the attorney for mr. wildstein has agreed to provide them to our council who's going to review them and they're going to come to an agreement on what can be included. what we're told preliminarily, the statement made that they were outside the timeframe or subject matter, pretty much on the mark. a couple pages our council says should be included. we hope to have them included with the record and have more to say about that in the near future. looks like there's a very small subset, 40-some pages i think out of the 900, that really probably should be included but others seem to be just outside the date range or talking about things that have nothing to do with the bridge. >> join say in t