allowing web users to be policed and social networks personal emails or even their own photos fabia reinhard from the pirate party in berlin state parliament sees it as another excuse for politicians to try and control the web. the initiative undertaken right now is not legally binding but it's shaping the position of the european union for the next years two of the internet and i think it's very important to define internet freedom and citizen ride every step of the legislative process in brussels and in the. right now it's maybe just an initiative and the next step may be a different kind of proposal and i think it's very important that we take from step and say that we don't want to have any internet censorship even if the idea behind it is very noble idea and i think that. especially from the from the executive branch. and the european union i think the somehow threatened by the internet i think the. it's very easy to control of the t.v. and some of the channels but it's very difficult to control what's going on the internet politicians on all levels of trying to find all of the there's

the merits in the case, there is a narrower grounds which were basically judged by reinhard. california created a separate institution of domestic partnership. the argument would be that the state that has done that has essentially disclaims any meaningful state interest in continuing to hold the "m" word for same-sex couples. there is no real meaningful distinction. >> the question of whether the other 35 states have to. the other one would be taking california and in ticket back. >> what did he say? >> he wove them together. >> they're always driven by coherent. >> interestingly, the defenders of doma and prop a hero how the world has changed since doma was passed. and how, regardless of what power the gays and lesbians had in 1996, they surely have more power now. that argument is in boats at the conclusion of the reply brief of chuck cooper representing prop. 8. what kind of impact do you think that clear change in the political world is likely to be had? >> it makes manifest that rather than imposing on the country another roe versus wade, this is a matter that is being

the merits in the case, there is a narrower grounds which were basically judged by reinhard. california created a separate institution of domestic partnership. be that the would state that has done that has essentially disclaims any meaningful state interest in "m" wordg to hold the for same-sex couples. there is no real meaningful distinction. >> the question of whether the other 35 states have to. the other one would be taking california and in ticket back. >> what did he say? together.n -- woven them together. they're always driven by coherent. >> interestingly, the defenders of do andma to prop 8 both heralds -- doma and prop a hero how the world has changed since doma was passed. and how, regardless of what power the gays and lesbians had in 1996, they surely have more power now. that argument is in boats at the conclusion of the reply brief of chuck cooper representing the prop. 8. what kind of impact do you think that clear change in the political world is likely to be had? >> it makes manifest that rather than imposing on the country another roe versus wade, this is a