>> director reiskin? >> two. one, regarding the scope post delivery 30%, is developing recommendations within the scope of this contract or will that be done by tjpa staff or elsewhere? >> we'll be working internally to do that as well as we can use our ppmc group to help us in that effort, and we'll be making that decision next summer to be able to put out a contract with that language in it. >> objection. a and -- okay. and then, can you confirm that this is the last extension of this contract that we'll be contemplating and any subsequent engineering work or design build work will be done under a new and separate procurement? >> director reiskin, i can confirm that definitely going beyond the 30%, we're going to release an r.f.p., depending on what the board chooses, we would present the procurement strategies to the board. so we want to get to the point where we have a deliverable to be able to work with. if we don't get the region three measure money in time, we'd have to get some additional money in order t

reiskin, we go to item 8, citizens' advisory report. i believe mr. weaver is here. >> as he's coming forward, bus cars for the cable car substitution are free. >> chairman brinkman: thank you. >> good afternoon. the c.a.c. met last week and had the opportunity to discuss the bike share program, particularly the dominant one in the city. and we got some -- hopefully good ideas from that discussion that i will share with you today. you have to carry the ideas forward. the sfmta-cac recommends that the agency require bike share notices to be posted and mailed to all community organizations in the surrounding areas as well as neighbors within 500 feet. at least 30 days prior to a hearing and that the m.t.a. board requires m.t.a. staff and motivate staff to create and maintain a dedicated webpage with the following info. one, proposed locations for bike share stations 30 days before hearing. two, interactive map, including present approved and proposed bike share locations, station locations, that is. three, suggestion form for residents and constituents

when i look up here at ed reiskin, and mohamed knnuru, im lucky to have them up here. it takes huge amounts of courage, and let's give them a hand for theirs. i also want to say if you haven't signed up for cleanpowersf yet, i don't think harlan will let you leave until you do. it's not enough to sign up, it's supergreen. thank you. yes, 100% renewable. easy to do, and renters can do it, too. so we've got a couple other people i want to call out because they are near and dear to leadership and courage in our city, and that are our three members of the commitment on the environment who are here today. we have commissioner lisa oyos, and commissioner verme, and eddie. so finally, we have in san francisco some of the most energy and resource buildings in the world, and the moscone expansion where we are standing today and what we're listening to in the background is a great example of green building standards in practice. so how fitting is it that the world will be coming to talk about climate here in moscone next week. and i want to thank mohamed nuru and edgar lopez and

. >> it might be in light of that, director reiskin, going forward, when we try a new street device, that perhaps we do two things. one, we establish what will happen if this new idea doesn't work. in this case t would have been great if we said, we're going to see what happens if we put in this traffic signal, and if this traffic signal doesn't work, we're going to put in a traffic circle, and to put them in for a period of time on the street to allow people to get used to them before we decide we're going to alter them or take them out. i'm just thinking of all the people on the 5 and 5 r that they're back in the situation of coming to a full stop. as many of you know who rite the 5 or 5 r, a stop is a wroting movement. it would be nice if that bus was -- jolting movement. it would be nice to know that kind of would have it lined up before going in, we're going to try this if this doesn't work, and if we can't get it to work, we're going to a traffic signal. >> okay. thank you. >> thank you. directors, any new or infinished business? seeing none, we'll move on. >> item seven, direc

reiskin's leadership. in the last several budgets, we've invested in maintenance there's been nothing but increases in the last seven to eight years because we realize the importance of doing that and the necessity to improve the service. next, we talk about dealing with safety and security. the first part of it, the operational safety part, we need to knock down our collisions. we're up in about 35 on average a week. we need to take that down and take it down quickly. we've done a lot of good work. we know where the collisions are and what types are occurring. we need to galvanize our work force to continue to look at ways to reduce the collisions. it's a service issue and safety issue. on the physical security, again, looking at the current situation we have, we want to build off the basics. what that means is, in stations, we need to judiciously but quickly do things like improve the lighting, the physical environment with paint, with benches, and also we need to move faster on our video program. we are

if i were supervisor, i would actually ask that ed reiskin would step down. he's been given ample opportunity to serve us, and he hasn't done that the right way. >> thank you. thank you very much. mr. tom? >> i used to work on the caps commission, which is now part of m.t.a., and when everything folded into the m.t.a., we lost control of a lot of our transportation issues. what i would do is i would call for an independent audit of the m.t.a., and we can specifically say of the l tearaval or the n judah. this holds people accountable. it quantifies the performance and brings up the level of efficiency. so we need to have accountability for m.t.a. to the public, and i would make sure that that happens. >> thank you very much. miss basan. >> thank you. i agree with mr. tom that when m.t.a. was created as a merger between the department of parking and traffic and muni, it was a colossal failure, and i think it should be split up again, and it should go back to the way it was with the department of parking and traffic as one entity dealing with traffic, and muni

i will own up to that it was me among others, i, among others, who said to director reiskin, we cannot hold off on neighborhood requests for a global solution because we'll be holding off too long and we need to deal with our elected supervisors and our neighborhood. and we need to be equitable in these solutions. it would be unfair to say to district 11, you cannot get what district 4 got. i will vote for this. i'm happy it's one block. i'm happy that the supervisor understands the pressure that's coming back to try to do some things in his district as well as others. i agree with directors borden and rubke that it's unfair, but i will vote for this. director hsu? >> director hsu: i think director torres and heinicke said it all. if i understand, it's appealable, is that right? so i will support with the understanding that it's not the end of it, but that the board of supervisors will have the opportunity to take this up. >> chairman brinkman: a couple of things that stuck out to me in this conversation as a city, we have not come up with a solution. i will agree that i was with the d