have to autho that author relatp and understanding of the work and how could they do the best work bu that still do their wor. i wouldn't take that kind of thing so personally but being prepared that it fits o but it't because somebody else won't. >> we have finite resources we can only publish a certain books properly. we are not a volume driven operation and want to make sure we get every boo give every boot level of attention. >> i'm sure there are things we missed and we would love to have questioned from the audience. i am currently writing my dissertation so what i wanted to know what to say the person takes a revisionist approach so you don't have to be diplomatic let's say you follow the political conventions and they agree and think it's great and tell you it's going to be attacked but it's good so then they know you but you are overturning the research. what happens then, coul could be rejected just because you are disproving them? >> if they revealed they were saying don't publish it because it overturns my work -- >> it wouldn't be that explicit. >> that people can tell wh