. >> i'll have to relook at the english i think this is essentially what it does you does it feel like the right punitive measure i don't know what agency is going to stop a project when the street is torn up we're going to take this contract and leave the neighborhood you know in sham he lives in the meantime and there are things built to into the ordinance that allows for waivers if a particular piece of equipment is not available the contractor california for a waiver from that particular requirement i would have to relook at what the ordinance legislation says and excuse me. the legislation digest has a quarterly reporting so the public has a public record for consultants. >> the st. john gibner would like to comment. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney like to follow up on the possibility it didn't go to our question supervisor jane kim about how the departments are admonishment but in terms of what the remedies are the contract for the project will exterior the contractor comply with the construction so non-compliance will mean suspension or the contract or - or for potentially

i ask the staff to relook at the policy and make sure the structure is there so that when there is a dispute, it's contained in whatever structure you set up to manage those types of disputes. >> if i could, director, lee, one thing that's different about this sponsorship opportunity from the regular advertising is that sponsorship it wouldn't change every month or some period like you might see in some advertising with the sponsors name. we may at least not confront this with questions about does this or not meet our policy. >> i think it is something that at first glance, charge ahead but when you see it's a lot of complexities. what is the external. the idea of there is a lot of public places that have a lot of different external characters. time square in new york has an iconic external character. whether that would fit anything like this, we don't know, right? it might be interesting to work with the citizens advisory committee. here are some examples. that's what we are thinking. do we want digital screens in just advertising in digital crime scenes and get that to a policy >>

transportation project to being a program that engages people that are some of the things we'll go back and relook at the data that will help us in new discussions about the best model in working with the agency from the advocates so we're looking at the data. >> i want to appreciate that i feel like the department has a lot of great data and if it's not the right data we need what's the right data to 4th i know that every case is a unique situation but this is you know a large issue for our shelter providers and i feel like we need concrete ways of addressing larger categories and making sure they're getting the needs met and if the data is not helping us to figure out this it would be good to know what data to inform the work with the dph but i want to mention in our conversations with director barbara garcia she's talked about a lot of great ideas we're interested in the providers partnering up and doing a pilot with one of our health clinics that provides additional help and something we've decided last friday as well. >> we are looking that and hopefully work with the dph based on all the que

this is something that we had years ago and we want to relook at that and look into the history and see how it can be utilized and applied to what we do now. last, staff satisfy angz. this is how we provide value and recognition and appreciation for the african american staff that we currently have. this is a exciting slide, this shows how we are really integrating across the department and this is part of a large rb commitment of work force development plan. this will go beyond the next 10 years. this is in the future of probably our grand children if they want to work for the health department of what the work force will look like. so far we have-we had a african american health initiative collective impact working group and that group looked at improving the health outcome. develop implementation plan and we'll report back from each working group. they received-there was a group of at least 40 people that receivered training on result based framework completed on december 10 in 2014. we are irking with quality improvement team and ambulltory care and have line indicators. there is no

conserving actually more than we anticipated so with the 41 the $41 million shortfall we have to relook at you know what we're doing and the other thing that we are probably going to spend a lot of time talking to the commission about is that when you look outside, there are a lot of construction going on a lot of hook ups to our sewer and water system and one of the things i'm concerned about a lot of developers are looking at us because our time of hooking these water, their water up, it's actually because of limited resources, it's taking us longer and so that's some that's some of the things that we want to talk about and the other thing the watershed assessment there's no funding for that but with all these new developments in, they are required to to do that so we just need to really talk about, you know, not only the policies but some some of the practices that are actually going on so the commission can see what the challenges are because what we may end up doing is asking for more resources especially the areas where we cover the funding like the hook ups to water we actually c

are relooking at a broader set of sanctions? what makes us think that those set of sanction also change the russian president's mind more than the current ones? >> well, let me start with the broader point. i think both angela and i have emphasizeed that the prospect for a military solution to this problem has always been low. russia obviously has has extraordinaryily powerful military and given the length of the russian border with ukraine, given the history between russia and ukraine expecting that if russia is determined that ukraine can fully rebuff a russian army has always been unlikely. but what we have said is that the international community working together can ratchet up the costs for the violation of the core principle of sovereignty and territorial integrity. that's exactly what we've done. russia has paid a significant cost for its actions first in crimea and now in eastern ukraine. it has not yet dissuaded mr. putin from following the course that he is on. but it has created a measurable negative impact on the rus

. >> i had to relook at a whole lot of things. it's not just go to the hospital and have this repaired. it is really looking at yourself fully and deeply. and that's a tough arena. >> sarah has done that. now, in addition to her love of art, she takes time to love herself. >> my work is to calm down. my work is to pay attention. >> if you don't, she says, you might not get a chance to see the beauty in life and in art. that's all around you. i'm liz bonis, abc 7 news. >> coming up on abc 7 news at noon the new "dancing with the stars" cast revealed. find out who is competing for that gold mirror ball trophy. and the strange place that 20 manatees ended up stuck and how they were rescued. >> nearly 20 manatees are free this afternoon after getting stuck in a florida storm drain of all places. fire officials say the marine mammals are all alive and have to the indian river lagoon system along the east coast of the state. it took a team of rescuers police and even firefighters armed with earth moving equipment to free those manatees.

. >> a lot of those individuals have been talked to back in 1989, to relook at them is never a bad thingly encouraging people to come forward and share, because we're really trying to piece this together. if the right people come forward, i think we can get this figured out. i really do. >> i think it's so important for the wetterlings to know at least something about what happened to jacob. and there are those stones that haven't been turned over. >> i think they ran straight back toward those trees, and then when they looked back and didn't see jacob coming, they thought everybody was coming. when they didn't see him, then they cut over and we just live straight kitty corner from here. we cannot leave our house without driving past here. it took me a long time. i mean, i would come here and say a little prayer every time i walked by. i talked to jacob, but it was -- that's been a really hard thing. i want to know who took jacob. i want to know what happened. ♪ >> according to witnesses to jacob wetterling's kidnapping, the perpetrator was of average height and weight with a deep, raspy

. >> we're hearing a lot about people relooking at how they are going to handle those exemptions. >>cal em exemptions. do you think the federal government should mandate these vaccines for all children well enough to get them? and, if not, what about on the state level? there's proposed legislation in california that would mandate this. >> traditionally, the federal government doesn't mandate those types of things. they put out the strong recommendations that we see with the cdc. traditionally, the mandating and restrictions about getting into schools have been at the local and state level. >> so should states mandate it? >> some states do. they put restrictions. obviously, as you mentioned correctly, that there are valid reasons particularly medical reasons not to get vaccinated. but many states mandate a significant restriction on for example getting into school. you can't mandate it in a way that you punish people for it but you could put restrictions on it. that has to be at the state level. >> i guess i'm wondering obviously the state of california has 13,592 kin ger kindergartn

the events of the last year cause us to relook at this. we had some surprises out there. every single year in the world there are events that unfold area -- unfold. forces have the time to reset -- have to have the time to reset on full spectrum readiness after 13 years of counterinsurgency. they need two rotations through the national training center to achieve that level of readiness. that alone takes money and takes time. there are some other air forces that have not come home as we have thought because they have been ordered to do other things in the world. the isr we thought was going to come out of afghanistan is going to that region of the world. we are moving things around and responding to what the nation calls upon us to do. our primarily garrisoned back home station, they are trying to get their rotation rates set. the challenge for the department and navy and for the marine corps and navy force themselves are too big challenges. one of those is being able to reset their aviation arm, especially older model fa 18's. the devil backlog is a long-standing issue. i

. >> i had to relook at a whole lot of things. it's not just go to the hospital and have this repaired. it is really looking at yourself fully and deeply. and that's a tough arena. >> sarah has done that and now in addition to her love of art, she takes time to love herself. >> my work is to calm down. my work is to pay attention. >> if you don't, she says, you might not get a chance to see the beauty in life and in art. that's all around you. i'm liz bonis, abc 7 news. >> coming up on abc 7 news at 5:00 disconnect the. find out why you may have trouble logging on to facebook this morning. >> a little later, marking a milestone. the big step for a little panda at the national zoo. >> and a stray bullet strikes a 9-year-old boy in the head. he survives. police recover guns, shell casings but the shooters are still on the loose almost five months later. find out what might be holding up >> time now for a look at the day's top stories. owner of the ramheads tavern in savage mill is accused of secretly videotaping women in the restroo

i think we need to relook at the issue of our monetary support for the pakistani military, but military but we have to be careful. i sat in many of these debates. oh we truly prepared to either let pakistan become destabilized given its arsenal we will make an enemy of pakistan? how far down that path to we really go? every time we did from a policy standpoint it got so scary in many ways that we pull back and just continued trying to change the behavior. in my view the nuclear arsenal is the key and we have to be careful about how far we let pakistan destabilized. that said, as we are providing funds we will be providing funds to face more -- by more takes to face india? as we shift toward being focused on his extremist problem threatening pakistan we have to really think about whether we're willing to accept the pakistani state more reliant upon a nuclear arsenal. so it is a more broad regional problem. i think the united states is to figure out what his priorities are. i agree with where i think your going. .. things have sort of seemed to be more normalized and a big factor here is

we currently are not under fire not under fire but relook for some type of security.> so there is this moment where somebody's saying our helicopter was taking small arms fire and we -- it's not taking it now but they were and we need to find some place for security. that's in the radio. do you have any idea what that was in reference to? >> i do actually. i spoke with the flight engineer on williams' chinook, joseph miller. what he told me as williams and the nbc crew actually they had been given a headset and they had taken a microphone and put in an earpiece of the headset so they could pick up the radio communications between the company that they were in and another company of chinooks that was flying a separate mission in the opposite direction. so what you're hearing is that radio chatter from that other company that was coming under fire. >> fascinating. today, former nbc nightly news anchor tom brokaw disputed some claims made in the "new york post" and other places that he wanted brian williams fired. he released a statement saying quote, i have neither dema

one, seeing what isis is doing with these hostages, it's fair to say we need to relook at how we dealstage situations and do we have a serious team that can be the center point, you know the situation room for hostage taking. i also think a lot of the families and what they said was they were very frustrated with limited knowledge they were given about what was going on. imagine having a family member being held by a terrorist group for multiple years. you would hope that somebody would be in touch with them at a high level every moment of every day and they have a number to call no matter what's going on because they deserve that. and so i think if anything it may be the issue of communication is where we need to learn. obviously, this is not going away anytime soon so we have to get a better way of dealing with it. >> and, ben and mark one thing we should point out and we do know this the white house is in the -- the administration is in the middle of a hostage policy review and part of that is to this thing you just mentioned, ben, communications between the administration and fami

comfortable that the construct is generating better value if that were to change we would have to clearly relook at it. >> thank you very much. i'm still going to ask you questions. i want folks to ask some questions as well. i know we have a microphone going on. i know we have questions coming in via social media i'll wait for those. why don't we start with the crowd since you took the trouble coming here today if i could -- right here in the center of the audience and she's coming right behind you. >> yes admiral, thank you for coming. we were talking about the sony attack earlier and we heard the justice department is investigating it as a criminal matter and we've seen sanctions . what is exactly your role in this? not just identifying this, but do you see any action that you intend to take or have taken in response to this? >> well, i'm not going to get into specifics what, as a member of department of defense, putting on my u.s. cyber command role, if you will, what we may or may not do. i think the president's comments about we're going to start with economic peace and then we will look a

one, i do think we need to relook the issue of our monetary support to the pakistani military. but we have to be very careful. i've sat in many, many of these debates, and are we truly prepared to one either let pakistan become destabilized given its arsenal or two make an enemy of pakistan that were -- i mean, how far down that path do we really go? and every time we did from a policy standpoint, it got so scary in many ways that we pulled back and just continued trying to change their behavior. so in my view, their nuclear arsenal is the key. we have to be very careful about how far we let pakistan get destabilized. that said, as we're providing funds, are we providing funds to buy more tanks to face india, or are we providing funds to help them fight the insurgency one. and, two as we shift there, we try to work with the pakistanis to shift towards focusing on this extremist problem that's now threatening pakistan as well, we have to, i think we have to really think about whether we're willing to accept the pakistanis being more reliant on their nuclear gnarls now vis-a-vis

comfortable that the construct is generating better value if that were to change we would have to clearly relook at it. >> thank you very much. i'm still going to ask you questions. i want folks to ask some questions as well. i know we have a microphone going on. i know we have questions coming in via social media i'll wait for those. why don't we start with the crowd since you took the trouble coming here today if i could -- right here in the center of the audience and she's coming right behind you. >> yes, admiral, thank you for coming. we were talking about the sony attack earlier and we heard the justice department is investigating it as a criminal matter and we've seen sanctions. what is exactly your role in this? not just identifying this, but do you see any action that you intend to take or have taken in response to this? >> well, i'm not going to get into specifics what, as a member of department of defense putting on my u.s. cyber command role, if you will, what we may or may not do. i think the president's comments about we're going to start with economic peace and then we will look at

so yes, there's an absolute time to relook how we view these types of contributions. >> also now on the aumf -- the authorization for the use of military force, you know that. but now you see what's out there. the democrats say it's too broad, the respects say it's too narrow. with what you hear in what's being offered, do you think this is the right type of approach? >> yes. yes. it does repeal 2001. so it gives the president still has very very broad authorities. whether he chooses to use those, under that remain in place. but the new one says look we've got a problem that is metastasized, in 2001 we didn't know what it looked like. we have a pretty good sight picture on what this enemy looks like where it's located. how it's getting its motivation. how it recruits how it deploys and we described geographically kind of where it is. we need to be able to define that very precisely. and as michelle indicated, the word "enduring" leaves the door open for interpretation in terms of what does that really mean. the president has very broad latitude and it's good that he hasn't taken a capab