. >> we're providing this fund to provide some financial incentive for someone who's otherwise reluck tonight to -- reluctant to come forward. maybe we can have a happy ending to this. >> and police are investigating a report from a truck stop employee that came face to face with a girl who appeared to be molly. >>> in washington, growing signs the president wants to sit down for an interview with robert mueller's team. but his legal team isn't so sure it's a good idea. >> reporter: president trump's legal team is trying to work out the parameters for the president to sit with an interview with robert mueller. >> he's always be anded in testifying. -- interested in testifying. it's the lawyers that the reservations about that. >> reporter: the new york times is reporting president trump is pushing the lawyers to reach an agreement to testify. the times says the team is standing firm on the topics of discussion, including possible coordination between associates and russia and whether the president tried to obstruct the investigation. mueller's team did agree to accept some answers in

threat, they captured a lot of land because of failure to really take them seriously, what was the relucky, you think? >> attempt to drawdown forces in afghanistan and what we saw is mini surge, using tactics and bringing advisers closer to fight to help afghanistan forces control more of that territory, air power is leading part of that with special operations forces working there, i think what we see president trump reluctant but doubled down to make strategy work to bring parties into some form of negotiation, that hasn't happened yet but that's still our strategy. jackie: i want to talk about north korea, the meeting seemed to go really well and gridlock of nothing really happening, both parties stopping there. >> perfect, jackie, the denuking is on track but the railroad engine has stopped. north korea says that they have destroyed nuclear test site, taken apart missile testing equipment and, of course, returned remains so now they want some concessions, but what trump and pompeo and secretary mattis are saying, you have to do more, you to see real progress towards denuclearization a

. >> reporter: they're not the only ones reluck tant to speak out.h carolina companies are concerned but fear if they say anything, they will become a part of his twitter wrap. >> the president has shown you are better off working with his administration on issues to understand it and allow them to get to if right answer. >> reporter: ironically, trump's tough talk on trade was a part of his appeal in south carolina. now there is concern trump's trade war is about to backfire on them and possibly, eventually on him. >> i don't see this issue changing voters' mind. now if you look down the road and there are concerns. >> reporter: worries about the current trade war between the u.s. and china, there is actually good news for the spartanburg line, that i are adding a new vehicle, they will be adding about a thousand more jobs over the next few years. >> all right, thank you, martin. >>> so, nasa just picked nine astronauts who will launch the first spacex nutz. we will tell you their mission in a moment. it intelligently senses your movement and automa

and his reluck tans to directly condemn white supremacists started a stark contrast with ivanka. not to mention a contrast with the president's forceful takedown of his own attorney general, calling jeff sessions on twitter scared stiff and missing in action. this as the president's legal team is locked in intense negotiations with the special counsel over whether the president will sit for an interview as part of the ongoing russia investigation. thursday night the president dined with his lawyer, rudy giuliani and former mayor of new york joining me now. mr. mayor, thanks so much for joining me. we appreciate it. there's been a lot of news about the back and forth with the special counsel about whether there's going to be an interview. i want to play for you the rationale you've offered as to why you don't want the president to be questioned about his dealings with then fbi director james comey. take a listen. >> we're walking them into a possible perjury trap, not because he isn't telling the truth but because somebody else isn't telling the truth who they would credit, namely

americans, critics of the that echos the phrase from last year when he blamed violence on both sides and reluck tans to condemn white sprem cysts, a stark contrast, there is no place for neo-naziism in our great interest and contrast with the forceful take down of his own attorney general, calling jeff sessions scared stiff and missing in action as the president's legal team is locked in intense negotiations with the special counsel over whether the president will sit for an interview as part of the ongoing russia investigation. thursday night he dined with rudy giuliani. thanks for joining me, we appreciate it. there's been a lot of news about the back and force whether there's going to be an invut. i want to play the rationale why you don't want the president to be questioned by his dealing with then fbi director james comey. we're working him into a perjury trap, who they would credit namely comey. >> they have indicated to us even in our discussions -- pressure for these other people -- >> how exactly has the mueller team led you to believe they have a preference for comey, that they would

he's also very reluck tangt cta allow the prosecutors to show exhibits while they're telling their story. in a complex case like this, i think it's really important for the jury to see these exhibits as they're coming in so that they can understand them. the judge says things like the jury can look at those things later. but if they don't see it at the moment, i think it's going to be very difficult for them to go back and pore through financial documents to find the one nugget that was relevant to the testimony at a particular moment. >> liz holtzman, can i get your take on this topic broadly. we heard pretty salacious things from rick gates about his extramarital affairs and some suggestions that perhaps he didn't reveal those as he should have. how much do you think this, despite the judge saying, hey, we're not going to touch the trump campaign and russia, how much do you think this is impacting the white house right now? >> well, i mean the white house has to be concerned about a conviction of manafort, definitely, because it's going to look bad for the president. he, after all, pic

we have the number one offensive cyber capability in the world and we use it, very, very reluck tanlynd some of that is for good reason but when these sites, aggressive as they are, as microsoft was describing them and these other sites meddling in our elections we know where the sites are coming from. we know who they are. we can attack them through our cyber kippability and destroy those sites. every time -- stuart: i want to get this right, when we attack those sites, you're talking about destroying those sites. how do you mean destroy? not blowing them up. what are we doing? >> you're destroying a site through offensive capability, can no longer use the computers, hard drives, et cetera. we physically destroy it. we've done some in the past but we have to do who are of it this is a tool available to us. we have to recognize we are involved in conflict operations. this, russia certainly is committed to it as is, as is china. this is the new norm. we've got to use all the tools in our kit bag to push back on them. yes, publicly, humiliate them. yes, use sanctions to try to impose ou

those officers are trained and then professionals, they are not reluck tantaros to use that force butat gets dragged into the court next. and you see what the outcite from the public is. brian: how does it change? how can you change quickly because you certainly have somebody from the oval office who is in support of law enforcement. so you can't say well, we are getting the wrong message from the top. >> no, we need to keep the dialogue alive. we need to speak to our communities. we need to speak to our community leaders to bring the rhetoric down. again, it becomes an easy target for those that want to act out. we're the ones that go out -- we are delivering babies, we are being the psychologist. we're the marriage counselor. we do a lot of different functions as a cop. to be targeted against the public, the public that we're entrusted to protect and serve, it's kind of disheartening. brian: do you need the death penalty for shooting and killing an officer? would that be the deterrent? >> without a doubt the deterrent should be the fact that if you shoot and kill the officer there s

on the other hand, i was on a panel yesterday with a democratic congressman and he expressed some reluck aware of the same history you just mentioned. efforts to impeach are rarely successful. its very unlikely you'll get 67 votes in the senate to convict and they're aware that have backlash with bill clinton 20 years ago. >> it would mean politically, though, already you're seeing pushback in terms of approving kavanaugh and other issues -- >> you're also seeing pushback with some republicans on the trail now who are in general elections as opposed to finishing their primaries, trump won largely on an idea of draining the swamp and as joe knows better than anybody, there was a big perception there was a swamp in washington back in those years. i think this hurts him politically and that's all that really matters. we're not going to have a trial of trump in a federal court and we're probably not going to have a trial in the senate of impeachment. the voters say, hey, this is just a mess. >> we've got people on the left saying that, i mean, saying things like he could 10% of trump voters