federal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, doug burns, trial attorney, former prosecutor, remi spencereous on any level the way in which this has proceeded. >> you certainly don't need to be a lawyer to understand this case is tragic, and the outcome is incomprehsible. a couple of pointshat most viewers probably don't realize. this was a juvenile, not adult. it works differently for juveniles. it is about rehabilitation opposed to punishment. the headlines, has been out the affluenza defense, but there's been more to the case than that. keep in mind, this is a reckless standard, not intentional. mean, others have said it before me, from the psychiatric and psychological point, it is junk science. from the legal pointof viw, it is junk law. forget it. it's never going to be any type of recognized defense. and remi is right, the fact of the matter is the case gets slightly distorted because i am not so sure, i think the adlines kind of overran. >> a judge who may have made a bad decision. but forget the affluenza thing, it is stupid. sorry to so blunt. >> i personally prefer direct spoke