expedited removals' account for 30% of all removals. the expedited process is carried out by -- expedite the removals account for 30% of all removals. another 1/3 of removal cases involve those who illegally re- entered the country. in that case, the prior quarter of removal is reinstated. voluntary removals involve those convicted of aggravated felonies, which is an expensive category of crimes. thousands are removed each year based on stipulated orders of removal. a typical stilicho the best of the code stipulated removal -- a typical removal has the immigrant sign a stipulated order. the immigration judge confirms that the order was knowingly and willingly signed. there is also a similar expurgated process -- an expedited process. the upshot of all of these developments is that there is a growing gap between immigration judge removal orders and actual removals, immigration judges issued 100,000 removals, . some have rule of law concerns about the increasing in formality of these laws. progress and authorities are being substantially

>> you want it removed? >>> yes. >> is there a motion by a member of the committee? i don't want it removed, but if someone else does, that's their option. all right. >> aren't they allow today do that? >>> are you going to put it over to another time? >> no, no, i don't want to do that. >> just to be clear, in removing it from consent, that's essentially what you're doing by allowing someone to testify on an individual item. but then you're going to call it. you're not removing it from the calendar. you're going to call it and vote on it -- >> correct. >> all right. >> motion -- >> i move to remove it from -- >> mr. courtney, without objection, that will be the order. all right, dr. jackson, now you can legally speak. >>> thank you. when i saw this on the calendar, and i read a, i would like -- if staff is here, you have in front of you, i think it's the thier group, who is that? i just wanted information as to who this group is if needed for community and outreach services. who are these people? who are th

i mean they remove the bulb-out at filleti's market because the struks can't get by. if a delivery truck can't get by what about fire trucks. when you look at the entire neighborhood as a whole and combined with the fact that you have these raised concrete plantares which are totally new and unique and they are a part of the permanent physical structure, and the fact that you have about 29 or 31 driveways on the scott -- i mean on oak, that would be impacted, just again getting to the density of people having to back in and out, past this bike lane, and when you consider that not many bicycles don't use lights, day or night, many of them blow through red lights, they -- you know, they just drive recklessly, a lot of them. so when you add that situation to the existing density, the complexity of the neighborhood, the fact that it's a lot of pedestrians, tourists, a lot of businesses, there's a hotel on divisadero, the big sp, former sp hospital building, which is a senior center, there's an orthotic and pros at the timic center servicing disabled people on divisadero,

removed. some have rule of law concerns about the increasing informality of this process. others applaud this development. our finding is simply that these little known programs and authorities are being substantially used at this point. third, as muz described, immigration and criminal enforcement have have been strongly linked. an example, roughly 30,000 of criminal alien removals in 2011 were for persons who committed immigration offenses for which they have been criminally prosecuteded. that's about 20%. we've also seen growing numbers of removals of persons with criminal convictions. some for quite serious crimes and some for misdemeanors. in 2012, nearly 55% of the persons removed had been convicted of a crime. in 2008, less than a third had been. our fourth finding is that government directed returns have decreased dramatically over the last decade. and the proportion of returns, the formal removals or deportations have reversed. what's a return? well, d.h.s. defines a return as a confi

on page two of the same application the statement that the plan show the removal of part of existing warehouse no other work. this wasn't part of existing warehouse as mentioned in the applicant's own letter in 2012 to the planning department. these were two buildings in his words 3,000, and 4,000 square feet and two buildings that were delollished and under the planning code requires any demo in one of these district tosi -- to be replaced and no mention the building was compromised. however in the process this was compromised as evidence of by the photographs in your file. mounds of dirt and soil. was there encroachment sidewalk permit for blacking the pedestrian area? no. were there dust controls for the workers and the general public and the neighbors and san francisco driving by? no. contrary to the late response of my brief that they state two horses were tapped into the building only one garden horse was used to control the dust in addition to a leave blower and that is in your file. the code outlines what is required of special inspections and none of these were conducted as

removing the encapsulated tbms at a later date is more difficult disruptive and more expensive than removing them at the conclusion of the central subway tunneling as currently planned. option 1, the retrieval shaft is approximately 200 feet from the closest resident and about 70 feet from the closest business. while work is within the public right-of-way, columbus avenue would be reduced to one lane of traffic in each direction in 2013 for approximately 10 months. the retrieval shaft does not impede a future station in north beach nor an extension into fisherman's wharf. and the retrieval shaft could be used for a future construction purpose essentially providing a home if and when a t-line extension from fisherman's wharf is constructed. the retrieval shaft could be used as the home for the future tbm that would construct the yet to be planned fisherman's wharf extension. now moving on to option 2 which is leaving the tbm head north of the chinatown station based on conversations with the planning department, this would require a minimal additional environmental study, leaving the tbms in

removing the commuter lane, adding raised plantares throughout the buffer strip and removing over 90 parking spaces constitutes an unusual circumstance of the project. proposed parking mitigation peat adequate. this is a highly dense touristy area and a main east-west corridor. there's no one else -- impact on neighboring streets such as hayes paige and haight street. part six -- is a priority street. finally, because the fell and oak project is obviously part of the greater plan to create bike lanes ceqa analysis should be done in connection with the eir for the san francisco bicycle plan project not piecemealed from the larger project that is ceqa rule. determination -- the determination made no effort to address the fell oak project in the larger context of the citywide bicycle projects. >> president chiu: thank you very much. colleagues, any final questions to the appellants, project sponsor or any other parties in this hearing? okay. seeing none, this hearing's been held and closed. colleagues, this item is in the hands of the board. supervisor olague. >> supervisor olague: i ju

to remove them, or alternately, to leave them underground. so, i just want to clarify that up front. i do want to acknowledge that the way this process developed from my understanding is that we were out in the community four years ago as the whole project in the entire e-i-r was going through its process, the focus was the core of the project. and while there was some i think discussion of where these machines would be going and where they would be coming out, i don't think it was a significant part of the discussion. i don't think it resonated with people. it was something far off. and once the approvals were in place, i think we kind of put our heads down and focused on getting the design work done, getting all the approvals, getting the construction contract underway. i think what we should have done better in hindsight is kept the north beach community engaged so that they weren't surprised as they were when we came back four years later and said, here we are. we're about to start tearing up columbus avenue. so, i think it's a point well

i removed the every but never specified she had removed the right over a. >> the records say the doctor not only removed the right of rebuttal sir -- also her full be into. the did not realize the mistake until she visited another doctor and had at cat scan. >> she felt like she was lied to. she was. >> her attorney argued that the doctor tried to cover her mistake by altering medical records. >> she added things to those records that indicated she was having right cited pain in her palace. things that were added for the sole reason of justifying or attempting to justify why she had not -- she had removed the right over. >> it took an hour to come back with the verdict. he is now looking into the possibility of more victims. >> we have received two phone calls from women within the past couple of days indicating they were patients and believe and over was removed that it should not have been or another part of their anatomy has been removed. without their consent. >> hour calls to the attorney have not been returned and someone who answered the phone at her previous office told us that

and so removing the parking was the compromise. and there's no significant impact on automobile intersection level of service, as much as i would like us to get away from using that metric, i do understand that metric and this project has thoroughly looked at that. therefore, there is no impact on transit, the 16x. the impacts on pedestrians is only positive. so there's no significant environmental impact there. and the impacts on bicycles is only positive. so there's no significant impact there. some of the other issues raised were noise. that struck me as kind of interesting. in my own understanding of transportation noise, the faster you go, the noisier it gets. so by calming and slowing traffic, you have less noise. the safety issue, slower traffic is safer. so the air quality issue struck me. this is a conundrum in regional planning. the general direction, and particularly with ceqa, is to look at the regional air quality and the regional greenhouse gas emissions. the way you do that is to reduce the vehicle miles traveled. th

citizen who have been removed over 2011. removals have been steady over democratic and republican and they certainly accelerated in recent years and many have questioned why an administration is devoted to comprehending the form and would remove the greatest number of people of any administration of u.s. history. it provides a partial answer at the least. which is the operational systems, and the financial investment since 1986 have made large-scale removal as was referenced, the 1996 immigration act was a particular turning point. it's built builds on a trend hearkening back to 1988 and it limited relief from removal. a second finding has to do with the increased informality of the removal process. there is a widespread belief that immigrants have their day in court and a judge determines whether they can or have to stay. this is no longer true for most people who are removed from the country. increasing numbers of noncitizens are being removed and expedited in so many ways. it now accounts for about 30% and the expedited p

>> clean up and remove? yeah. >> that is the permit before the board at this time. >> okay. >> thank you. >> mr. sanchez. >> thank you scott sanchez, planning department. i will be brief and defer to the city attorney but i believe the board has the ability to deny the permit and require them to get a permit to demolish if they feel this one was inappropriately issued because another one should have been issued. i would note if that is the case and they come in now for a permit to demolish it's documenting the work already done and applylet planning code to that and they're required subsequently to rebuild the building at least the size that it was before if not twice as large. we need to calculate that for the site because section 230 requires that the building be the same size or twice as large, so that would be the implications i would see at least on the planning department side. >> and is that inconsistent with the letter of determination? is it additional requirement not out lined in that letter? >> so

the county attorney says removing him so soon may be illegal. his opinion centers around the word "conviction.' >> they have no authority to remove any official convicted of a crime until the conviction is a matter of record, until the conviction is final. maryland law is very clear. the conviction becomes a matter of record at the time of sentencing. >> the judge is expected to set the sentencing date. his conviction and never become final. sarah sampson, wbal-tv 11 news. >> testimony resumes in the murder trial for michael johnson. he is accused of killing phylicia barnes. an inmate said johnson confessed to killing her. a coroner admitted her decision was made by default because there was no other obvious explanation. >> the governor delivered the annual state of the state address yesterday. he wants a new source to find transportation projects. he also talked about gun control and repealing the death penalty. there was a hint of purple. >> there is more that unites us than divides us. this year one of those things is the mighty, mighty balti

you wanna remove half his brain. the right half, it would be irresponsible to remove the left.in and gain function. not my brain. but his? who knows? look, let's say that i'm the left side of patrick's brain. i'm quick-witted, i'm charming, i'm great looking. you're the right side of his brain. you're useless, old, damaged. we go to a bar for a drink. now, i have the mad skills to be scoring all the hot babes, but instead i'm spending my time wiping drool off your chin and making sure you don't eat the tablecloth. what's the father wanna do? i don't know. so go wake him up. house. i'm so sorry. forgot i was dying, huh? i'm here if you need me. i need you. one small feel for man. one giant ass for mankind. thanks. good luck in boston. call the make a wish foundation. dr. foreman was just here. seizures have almost completely gone away. says we might be able to go home in the next day or two. thank you so much. i think we should remove the right side of your son's brain. i thought you fixed him. does he look fixed? right side of his brain was keeping him walking straight. other t

it will be harder to figure out how to remove the melted fuel. managers plan to complete that process in ten years. to meet their deadline they need to have a preliminary survey and development of robotic tools. >>> people across north eastern japan are looking ahead after the new year holiday. those in areas hit hardest by the earthquake and tsunami are reminded daily about their past. less than a third of the debris has been disposed of prer. rkers still need to dispose of more than 27 million tons of refuse and sediment. they want it gone by march of next year. workers had only dealt with about a tenth of the debris. ministry officials say they have had difficulties with handling waste they can't burn and with building incinerators. they have been challenged with dealing with debris contaminated with radioactive substances. government officials have tried to set up temporary storage facilities but they have run into opposition. they say the pace of removal has delayed efforts and put a psychological burden on residents. >>> thousands of people

at 1027, back in 2007 we removed a bus shelter at hyde and turk. in january of this year we removed the bus shelter at the corner of eddy and leavenworth. that is the 31 bus line. and people are advocating to remove the hyde and farrell at 38 -- -- which is the 38 geary line. i also want to mention the housing authority is not doing its due diligence when it comes to medical expenses. people that have -- can use that deduction are not getting it and their rent is higher because of it, which obviously has ripple effect. people are paying more rent that are low-income. i also, which was in the packet that obviously you are not going to get, which i will put up on the screen. multiple ways of doing this. can we have the screen? the 101 hyde post office is going to be removed, which is general delivery. they are going to be putting housing there. they are going to be putting housing there. the 101 hyde is the main post office site, where we have general delivery. those are people who don't have a mailbox go there to get their mail. so if you are on ga

12 thousand of newly accumulated sand of which they removed 11 thousand 433, it turned out not to be quite enough, we have a little bit of additional accumulation which we would have removed as part of this annual dredge cycle, however, we ran out of time. the dredging window for dredging closes on november 30th and they dredged up until the end, they had very complicated dredging sequence and their dredging contracts were not approved until the end of august so they're out there and removing sand right up until the end. when we realized we had this extra, about 2400 cubic yards yards of stand that needed to be removed, we applied for a permit and we were denied, there's herring, spawning in the area and dredging is very detrimental to their spawning and habitat during this time of the year, so there's a section of sand there that's left, but we have to come back next year anyway and we're already taking steps to try to get an early dredge approval and get our contract in place so they can come in as early as april, take out that sand as well as taking out any additional sand that ac

the attorney general told reporters the removal is illegal. >> they have no authority to remove an official until the conviction is a matter of record. until the conviction is final. maryland's law is clear. the conviction becomes a matter -- maryland clear. >> the council plans to vote on the resolution on monday. there is an idea to amend the resolution saying he will be removed after his conviction. >> the majority of the council will resist the amendment. >> do you think you jumped the gun? >> we need to assert some leadership. >> another day of testimony in the murder trial of michael johnson, the man accused of killing felicia barnes. an inmate told the jury he saw the teen's. the most surprising testimony came from the medical examiner, who admitted there was no obvious explanation and she could not rule out drowning. we will have an update tonight at 5:00 p.m. rape charges are dismissed against the co-owner of a popular restaurant. the customer claimed she was sexually assaulted inside a bathroom. after viewing surveillance footage from the night in question, the prosecution decided

have already completed debris removal. over 1,000 trucks are working daily to continue dry land debris removal with 26 more towns moving towards completion. we are now removing debris from our waterways. new jerseyans need to know nearly 1,400 vessels were either sunken or abandoned in our waterways during sandy. in mantoloking alone, 58 buildings and eight cars were washed into barnegat bay. we will remove this debris and dredge the bay to reduce the risk of flooding and to improve the health of the bay, beginning the very same week that this administration furthers its commitment to the health of the bay by implementing the toughest fertilizer law in america. [applause] we have helped get temporary rental assistance for 41,000 new jersey families, and where necessary, secured transitional shelters in hotels or motels or even in fort monmouth. we have worked with the small business administration to secure nearly $189 million in loans for thousands of home and small businesses, and through our new jersey eda, we have prov

have already completed debris removal. over 1,000 trucks are working daily to continue dry land debris removal with 26 more towns moving towards completion. we are now removing debris from our waterways. new jerseyans need to know nearly 1,400 vessels were either sunken or abandoned in our waterways during sandy. in mantoloking alone, 58 buildings and eight cars were washed into barnegat bay. we will remove this debris and dredge the bay to reduce the risk of flooding and to improve the health of the bay, beginning the very same week that this administration furthers its commitment to the health of the bay by implementing the toughest fertilizer law in america. we have helped get temporary rental assistance for 41,000 new jersey families, and where necessary, secured transitional shelters in hotels or motels or even in fort monmouth. we have worked with the small business administration to secure nearly $189 million in loans for thousands of home and small businesses, and through our new jersey eda, we have provided lines

is it simple alteration or remove afl a portion of a buildings similar to removing a deck or shed, versus was this a full demolition of a building. in this case two structures requiring a permit for application, notification, back review, and grading details and soil removal. the information and facts i will present that a full demolition occurred on the property despite the project application that was erroneous. we that the applicant did this when the building demolishes and enjoyed a cultural resource, the signage in the process of the work and disregarded two violations at the interior of the existing building and the construction of a non permitted sign despite -- fence despite motion to stop work. in light of this i am requesting that the retroactive revocation of the form eight application and the alteration permit and a requirement that the applicant file a full form six demolition permit. the applicant will attempt to cloud the reality with plans from the building of 1963, water bills, claims of water soils which do not exist. they will blame the zoning administrator, his travel

we are minimally affecting the road capacity by just removing a travel lane for two hours of the day. currently there's a fourth lane on two blocks of oak street for two hours of the day. and that is what we're planning on replacing with parking. we're also adding back -- sorry, we're also adding turning lanes on the street where they don't currently sphift s exist so that will facilitate turns. i think they try to make a common sense argument that, by removing parking or making any change to the street it's going to increase traffic congestion and it simply won't. also, a claim this they made was that the project will inhibit driveway access or inhibit access for people who need to get dropped off at their homes. again it simply won't. we have worked carefully with stakeholders from the pedestrian safety community, from the bicycle safety community, from the disability advocates community, to come up with a plan to make sure that the facility designs so that it's flexible so it's wide enough that taxis, paratransit vehicles can access it, street sweeping can sweep the space, emergenc

how do we remove this? is this the item that we're removing for discussion? >> i believe you can severe severe for discussion. >> i'm looking at this document. >> it can be receivered for discussion and if it's a personnel matter we may have to agendize that for closed session. >> thank you very much. >> any others, vice president norton? >> yes, page 14 1, k. it startsing on page 140, not 141. >> roll call. >> commissioner maufas. >> thank you, president yee. i wanted to announce and declare that i am an employee of oaks children center and i will refrain from any discussion and abstain on voting on items k4 and k26 and at that time i will leave the room. thank you. >> thank you. roll call vote -- another one? >> commissioner? >> i would like sever k5. >> >> superintendents proposal, none tonight. board members proposal, none tonight. j, request to speak regarding general matters. there are several speakers who will get two minutes each. before we get started with this section, again, when we are discussing general matters, we do not use any individual's nam