and they're not being remrplace at the same rate. who is replacing them? who is the average opium addict by, say, 1920? frank? >> it's people who know the opium addicts. it says on 121 there's a little passage here, it says today the numbers of new addictions through physicians' prescriptions is small. the majority of cases now result from association with other addicts. and then it goes a little bit further in the first sentence back to our regular text here. it says predominantly male urban poor. so they get addicted through other people, and they're in the lower class now again. >> right. they're not women and men. it's not distributed all over the place. it's not predominantly a southern and rural phenomenon. it's an urban male symptom of poverty in cities. and this is much more problematic socially and politically and legally than if it's the nice old lady who got addicted because she broke her hip or something and, you know, that -- you can explain that away. no one is worried about that. if it's young, poor men in the cities who are drug addicts and