other remthsdz, you know, we noticed there's a need to balance you know the historic preservation goal paid through by impact fees. you know the t dr program was put in there from 6 to one to 9 to one. but above that there are impact fees charged in the plan. in terms of information that's one of the big exchanges we heard about when he did the interviews. we recommend additional reporting on the annual usage of t dr and the market pricing and that may allow potential buyers to contact the t dr owners. and finally the t dr program be reviewed every 5 years. this was one of the first independent reviews of the program and we suggest that the rough be tied to the report that has to be done every 5 years on the downtown plan the downtown project and the next deadline is july 1 july 1st do 2015 and we think if the city were to sift the t dr it would be great to check in on that process >> thank you, commissioners so we have questions. >> commissioner pearlman. >> i actually read the entire thing and it's an interesting concept and program. i had a couple of questions. one is this may be di

so far as the staff remthsdz i think it would either be not sporting the legislation everywhere providing for the public hearing because i don't see the reconsideration in a written format or in an administrative process really changing anything. so i would support the commissioners in supporting supervisor kim and supervisor chus legislation >> thank you commissioner. >> thank you. i also say a comment about the historic properties are protected actually most historic properties are not landmarks their proptsd that have historic but have no designation at all. i think about 2 hundred and 50 landmarks and there are many, many properties that have no designation and the sequa process is one of the few methods of review you have those properties. and i think that it only takes a 2350i projects where you have a personal experience where something depose array where we here about the ortega branch library they received the sequa determination but the sequa determination deemed there were no changes to the project. and this kind of appeal process would have helped it was an unfortunate process

so far as the staff remthsdz i think it would either be not sporting the legislation everywhere providing for the public hearing because i don't see the reconsideration in a written format or in an administrative process really changing anything. so i would support the commissioners in supporting supervisor kim and supervisor chus legislation >> thank you commissioner. >> thank you. i also say a comment about the historic properties are protected actually most historic properties are not landmarks their proptsd that have historic but have no designation at all. i think about 2 hundred and 50 landmarks and there are many, many properties that have no designation and the sequa process is one of the