information to add but i want to reaffirm that the variance should be denied and support the dr requestor dave ryan and the dr should be taken thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker? >> and my name is michelle meyer and i did speak last time, if possible i would like to reiterate what i said last time, thank you very much. >> my opinion is that the planning commission should refuse the variance and should take the dr, and because the developer knowingly bought a very small lot unsuitable for the scale of his proposed development and in seeking a variance today, the developer is addressing a lot size restriction of his own making and the sellers were very clear in the setting instructions as you can see right here and the listing states that these properties being 1018 clayton and 1055 ash bury are to be sold to one buyer, and historically the property on ash bury was occupied by a garage, and on the developer rejected the suggestions that he complete the purchase, as originally listed and rebuild the garage on ash bury and it is possible that the cost associated with the complex engineering chall