. >> and unfortunately, these chchemicals are often, and i wod say most of f the time, rereased beforee there is s adequate arare harmful inin the environo. i thinknk neonicotinonoids are a prime exexample of thahat. >> epa assesses risk posed by pesticides prioioioioioioioioioy studies are typically conducted and paid for by pesticide manufacturers on their own product. epa says its decisions are informed by the best science available. inininininininininin studies by manufacturers, epa scientists review pesticide studies from peer-reviewed scientific journals and data from a wide variety of sources when they are available. but come outfter a pesticicide is on thee market may not be evaluated by y epa until a a pesticide cos up for rereview, a process that canakake long a a15 yea.. farmers like drew stabler of laytonsville, maryland say that neonics can be used safely and are indispensable to their business. >> well, i think that any product t that's on t the markes been tested and proven to do a a job, and whave faith i in tt process. myself as a farmer, i'veveveveveveveveveveve i've b