no transparency, no respect. in that respect of my mother, they do not respect my sister because i believe the #, we have a formation behind us, would help the women in the armed forces because they're the ones putting their life at risk, there are protectors, to be respected and heard and to be honored just like vanessa. because it's a disgrace when you get sexually harassed you have to report it to your line of command, but 80% of the time the line of command is actually sexually harassing you so you want to have confidence of trust to report it. that's why vanessa did not report it she was afraid of judgment and humiliation and she was ashamed even though the shame was the aggressor. we need a change in a positive change because our troops need to feel safe and respected because they're the ones putting their life at risk but yet my sister was truly deeply in love, she said if i have to go station in iraq and go to combat, i am a patriot and am serving the country and protecting. i was serving my family protec

save with respect to the presidency. i basically use the title "the living presidency" to provoke a progressives to make them think about what i think is a contradiction between their professed admiration for a change constitution, but their soft spot for the founders presidency, you know, what is wrong with an imperial presidency that grows over time if you can have an imperial congress whose legislative powers can change over time or an imperial judiciary control of constitutional rights and the integration expansion of them changes over time. my second point of what to bring today is living constitutionalism systematically favors the presidency as an institution. why? a a transit if you're going to constitutional change of the informal friday rather than article v the presidency is institution best poised to deliver that change. today we expect our presidents to articulate constitutional visions. we expect him to be pro-life or pro-choice, pro-or anti-gun, pro pro-or anti-affirmative action, you know, pro-or anti-all

if we are to have respect for law in america, we must have laws that deserve respect.t as we cannot have progress without order, we cannot have order without progress. and so as we commit to order tonight, let us commit to progress. this brings us to the clearest choice among the great issues of this campaign. for the past five years, we have been valued by government programs for the unemployed, programs for the cities, , and reapsr the poor from these programs and ugly harvest of violence and failure. our opponents will be offering more of the same. i say it time to quit touring billions of dollars into programs that have failed in the united states of america. [applause] to put it bluntly, it is time to take a new roads to progress. turn to the american revolution for our answer. -- world poverty be did not world of poverty did not begin five years ago. more wealth in america today, more shared than any nation in the world. we are a great nation and we must never forget how we became great. america is a great nation today, not because of what government did for peop

spending money or reallocating money with respect to the ball has its parallels with respect to propping up obamacare and subsidizing insurance companies. the attacks have their parallel with respect to the war in bolivia. you can go on and on. i think different people complain about different presidents. now it's democrats complaining about trump but the sort of actions i do not think are fundamentally different. >> i just want to say one thing about trump if i could. following up, i think that trump has been bombastic and his claims about executive power. he's exercised his powers does not unlawfully. the characteristic access i don't think that he has been as aggressive and unimaginative expanding and manipulating the delegated power as president obama. he's not engaged in disregarding statues with elaborate and aggressive theories president bush did. he is not followed through on the things he said he would do on the campaign trail so in some sense he's a menacing figure, and i do think that he is for many reasons aimed primarily doing things that are not at the edge of the power the

spending money or reallocating money with respect to the wall has its parallels with respect to propping up obamacare and subsidizing insurance companies. the attacks on syria have a parallel with respect to the war in libya. you can go on and on. different people complained about different presidents, obama and democrats complaining about trump but the actions are not fundamentally different. >> jack? >> one thing about trump and then a question for saikrishna prakash. following up on what saikrishna prakash said, trump has been bombastic in his claims on executive power, he has exercised executive power like the pardon power of the firing power aggressively but not unlawfully. the characteristic excesses of his predecessors aren't his. i don't think he has been as aggressive and imaginative in expanding and manipulating power as president obama was. he has not engaged in disregarding statutes with elaborate and aggressive theories president bush did. he has not followed through on what he said he would do on the campaign trail. innocence trump is a menacing figure, i think he is a mena

i have not changed in any respect since yesterday.our nomination, awesome as i find it, has not enlarged my capacity. i am profoundly grateful and emboldened by their comradeship and fielding. i have been deeply moved by their expressions of goodwill and support. urge to takest the the one opportunity that has been afforded me to pay my humble respects to a very great and good american whom i am proud to call my kinsman. albin barclay of kentucky. [applause] let me say i have been heartened by the conduct of this convention. you have argued and disagreed because as democrats, you care and you care deeply. but you have disagreed and argued without calling each other liars and thieves. without spoiling our best predictions. [applause] not spoiled our best predictions in any struggle for power. you have risen a platform that neither equivocate's, contradicts nor evades. you have restated our party's record in language and none can mistake and with a firm confidence in justice, freedom and peace unearth that will raise the hearts and the

i shall need them; we shall need them, because i have not changed in any respect since yesterday.our nomination, awesome as i find it, has not enlarged my capacities, so i am profoundly grateful and emboldened by their comradeship and their fealty, and i have been deeply moved by their expressions of good will and of support. and i cannot, my friends, resist the urge to take the one opportunity that has been afforded me to pay my humble respects to a very great and good american, whom i am proud to call my kinsman, alben barkley of kentucky. let me say, too, that i have been heartened by the conduct of this convention. you have argued and disagreed, because as democrats you care and you care deeply. but you have disagreed and argued without calling each other "liars" and "thieves," without despoiling our best traditions, you have not spoiled our best traditions in any naked struggles for power. and you have written a platform that neither equivocates, contradicts, nor evades. you have restated our party's record, its principles and its purposes, in language that none can mistake,

[applause] them, we shall lead them, because i have not changed in any respect since yesterday. iur nomination, awesome as find it, has not enlarged my capacity, so i am profoundly grateful and emboldened by their comradeship and their fealty, and i have been deeply moved by their expressions of goodwill and support. and i cannot resist the urge to take the one opportunity that has been afforded me to pay my humble respects to a very great and good american, whom i am proud to call my kinsman, alvin barclay of kentucky. [applause] let me say i have been heartened by the conduct of this convention. you have disagreed, because as democrats, you care and you care deeply. but you have disagreed and argued without calling each other liars and thieves, without dis-spoiling our great -- without spoiling our great spoiledn, who have not any of our best traditions in any naked struggles for power, and you have written the platform that neither contradicts or evades, you have recordmed our party's .n language none can mistake -- that will raise the hearts and the hopes of mankind to that

he respected you as much as i do. he respected you like everybody. we all respect you. and we are going to let you do your job. that is all we have to do. again, thank you very much. it is such an honor to be with you. this group of incredible men and women is mind blowing. i am going to leave you with this very simple phrase. i will never, ever let you down. i will never let you down. [applause] president trump: thank you very much. [applause] ♪ trumpmonday, president travels to minnesota, you will give a speech on the u.s. economy. live coverage begins at 3:00 p.m. eastern on c-span. the contenders, about the men who ran for presidency and lost, but changed political history. tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span.the first catholic presidential candidate al smith. morning, and author and howard university professor talks about the role o

in moscow, they do not respect weakness. european diplomacy may work elsewhere, but it will not work in moscow. this is a very serious issue and president lukasashenko will noto away until he is defeated. that is still far away. >> thank you. the eu foreign ministers meeting in berlin also decided to impose sanctions on turkey's ability to drill for natural gas. turkey sent an exploration vessel to begin drilling and disputed waters. greece accuses ankara of explication. -- exploitatation. the neighbors have taken part in joint patrols this month. our correspondent has been discussing this with the greek foreign minister. >> you had a foreign policy success at this meeting in berlin. the eu is willing to consider sanctions against turkey. what are the details? >> i will not consider this a success for us. i will consider a success for our comment european family. in the southeast and it's raining, we are facing turkish aggression, illegal behavior. behavior which goes against international law and the law of the sea. in our

he respected you as much as i do. he respected you like everybody. we all respect you. and we are going to let you do your job. that is all we have to do. again, thank you very much. it is such an honor to be with you. this group of incredible men and women is mind blowing. i am going to leave you with this very simple phrase. i will never, ever let you down. i will never let you down. [applause] president trump: thank you very much. [applause] ♪ monday, president trump travels to minnesota where he will give a speech on the economy. the life speech begins at 3:00 p.m. eastern on c-span. former secretary of state hillary clinton discusses america's role in the world in a prerecorded conversation hosted by the atlantic council. coverage begins at noon eastern on c-span, online at c-span.org, or listen on the free c-span radio app. next hour, ar the look at the life and career of california senator kamala harris, the democratic vice presidential candidate, and we will also show you some moments -- from theifornia c-span library. she is from california and attended howard

susana: there's no respect here for me at all. there's no respect. where's the respect? lemonis: customers are deserting her label. anna: honestly, we didn't make any money since 2009. lemonis: friends and family are demanding a piece of her business. susana: the brothers think i owe them their birth right. lemonis: i feel like you're being kind of, like, shaken down. and instead of standing up for herself and fighting for her brand, she's letting it fall apart at the seams. susana: this is bull[bleep] it's total bull[bleep] lemonis: if i can't help her regain confidence and harness her incredible talent... susana: it's really stressful to... lemonis: ...susana monaco's best days will be behind her. my name is marcus lemonis, and i risk my own money to save struggling businesses. we're not going to wake up every morning wondering if we have a job. we're going to wake up every morning wondering how many jobs we have to do. it's not always pretty. everything's going to change. everything. but i do it to save jobs, and i do it to make money. this... let's go to work. ...is

he's in many respects similar to at&t in that respect. the executive has asserted an absolute immunity defense that is unfounded in the law, and we're asking the court to resolve the issue so that the committee can expeditiously -- in response to this subpoena. i do like to talk as well unless there are further questions of standing about subject matter jurisdiction, and going to the plain language of section 1331 which makes very clear that there is jurisdiction over the committees sued in this case which arises under the constitution and laws of the united states as this court said in at&t in 1976. their argument is essentially an applied repeal argument. to the extent they're looking at legislative history or other factors, we know that the court did favor implied repeal, particularly in the jurisdiction al context. nothing about 1365 repeals a jurisdiction for house subpoenas under 1331. because, of course, 1365 deals only with senate subpoenas, and whatever limitations are in 1365 with respect to the senate are neither here nor there

but they were not do anything publicly with respect to mr. manafort because that could be unfair to then candidate donald trump. >> i want to thank you. my time expired. look, i think retrospective hearings are analyzing to look at the truth then -- but an oncoming election with the international interference we all know is going on and with conduct of an attorney general that is possibly further eroding the independence of that agency that they run, in addition to undermining the sacrosanct ideals of an independent election. these are the thinks we should be looking at right now to prevent what could happen in november that, to me, would be a serious blow to our overall democracy. i'm hoping thesese are issues tt we can explore as the committee. mr. chairman, thank you frÄulein me to go over time and ms. yates, it's very good to see again. i look forward to the next opportunity we have to connect. >> thank you. i believe that unless senator. ms. yates, thank you for appearing. just want to clear up some things that were brought up. are you f

whether it is with respect to climate change, with respect to taking the next step in terms of reforming the international trading system, whether it's beating covid-19 and delivering vaccines, not just to americans but to the entire world, there still is a central role for the united states to play even if at the same time, we have to recognize we are not going to be dictating to people, calling the shots. we are going to have to be in this much more 21st century form of leadership that you see not just with respect to international affairs but in business, and politics in so many other features of our society, a form of leadership that recognizes on certain issues, others will step up and be in the cockpit. but on the big ticket items, the u.s. is there to help set that driving role. i think it is fundamentally in our interest to play. >> i will keep bringing in a few more of our participants. one of our attendees is asking about turkey and the relationship with president erdogan and how do you actually think about the challenge of the eastern mediterranean where geopolitics is back an

to almost any variable we ca re respect to almost any variable we care about.mphasise different things, they have different points in their history and their engagement with modernity. yes, is lamb is not an accident. there arejihad is is a phenomenon on in is lamb, and it's not a phenomenon on in anglicanism or mormonism or scientology, and these beings... i want to know in the real world what this means view, samples that doesn't mean when donald trump back in 2017 imposed a travel ban, which was quite clearly aimed at muslims, and he listed seven muslim majority countries, which for security reasons, he said, could no longer travel to the noted states, were you cheering it on? on my blog... as a group of people, within which there will be a small minority, you say, who are statistically going to be jihadists? say, who are statistically going to bejihadists? which is precisely what donald trump would say. yeah, but, yes, hence the need to vet immigrants and refugees and have honest conversations about what we're looking for. we are looking for people who beli

trumpey shows that the is more respected -- is not as respected as others in the world. have an immense amount of work to do at home. that is why when you asked the question about strategy, any effective strategy for american engagement in the world has to start with making those deep investments in the strength of our own democratic institutions and progress on issues like dealing with systemic racism. that is a big part of joe biden's agenda. he will be working on that from day one and that sincere good-faith effort combined with treating our friends with respect being engaged in the , world and having a conversation where we acknowledge shortcomings and infirmities and point to a way to a better tomorrow, i think there is a way as if we take our time with it. we can't snap our fingers and say hey, we are back baby. we will steadily gain a new respect and a greater standing in the eyes of the rest of the world while doing this profound repair work at home. the linkage of these two things could not be more important and anyone working on u.s. foreign-policy cannot just

we saw about respect and those who don't respect others have a miserable life.nnon: hard to watch that. this is how the ap reported what went down, a group of people gathered in a park in eastern portland and marched to the local police precinct where authorities say they spray-painted building, popped the tires of police cars, vandalized security cameras the one officer was severely injured. when the feds left we were told this would stop. from what we can see with our own eyes that is not the case. >> this is the most predictable decline of civilization you could imagine. you have a mayor finally saying anything negative about riots, not demonstrations but riots and when he finally does that he pivots immediately to say you are helping donald trump. that is his actual concern about an attempted murder of police officers in the stationhouse, to see you are helping donald trump. when he couldn't just stop and talk about morality or lawlessness so that is the culture we're getting from the top. there are anarchists but the leadership in a position to end to it, t

my concern currently in america is that any disparity you find, whether in respect to police violencef great social importance, currently on the left, anywhere you go left of centre politically, the only explanation that is acceptable, and it really does have the kind of quality of a kind of blasphemy testing and religion, the only explanation that is a cce pta ble the only explanation that is acceptable at this moment is white racism. or systemic racism. in police violence, it just so happens that the only data we have suggests that, while african—americans data we have suggests that, while african—america ns have more encounters with the police, and there is obvious reasons for that, and they are roughed up by the police more than white americans are, they are not killed more. in fact, there killed less than white americans are, per encounter. if you come in to the attention of the police in america and they draw their guns on you. your chances of being shot appeared to be slightly higher if you are white. hang on. that brea ks if you are white. hang on. that breaks everyone‘s expec

which the government in uganda does not respect to want to return the rule of law and the respect for human rights as a common person one of our biggest cries as being the head of state that because we lose so many people that we shouldn't be losing 300 more than 300 children a day and more than 1000 women giving birth die in uganda on a daily basis one to improve the health one to improve education who want to improve agriculture because that is the bedrock of our economy we want to bring back the ownership of the of the natural resources and line of our country into the hands of the people and most importantly finally we want to unite our deeply divided country divided along ethnic. and religious and political lines one to unite our country and then prepare project it better image of our country because we as you can and we are better than they we are being represented or rather misrepresented all right that is. better known as bobby when talking to us from kampala uganda thank you. the global tourism industry is battling to survive in the pandemic here's a look at how the ritual to

that we could face today but the flipside is that frankly this is also an opportunity to show that respect for human rights is essential to an effective public health strategy and i mean let me give an example going to the origins of this pandemic if we look at what the chinese government did. at the outbreak of the epidemic they censored rather than heated the handful of doctors who tried to sound the alarm they said look at you know we don't know what's happening but there is a new leaf will spread out there they called it a sars like corona virus and what the chinese authorities did is you know rather than listen to them rather than act they suppress them because this is the kind of bad news that beijing doesn't like to hear there was a right and study by the university of southampton that you know if those 3 weeks of not been wasted it was 3 weeks during which literally millions of people traveled through one han left who when the virus really went global if not for those wasted 3 weeks by the end of february the prevalence of the virus would have been 95 percent less than it was so ac

my concern currently in america is that any disparity you find, be it in respect to police violence or interest and of great social importance, currently, on the left, anywhere you go left of centre politically, the only explanation that is acceptable, and this really does have the quality of a kind of blasphemy test in a religion, the only explanation that is acceptable at this moment is white racism or systemic racism. on the point of police violence, itjust so happens that the only data we have suggests that while, while african—americans have more encounters with the police, and i think there are obvious reasons for that, and they are actually roughed up by the police more than white americans are, they are not killed more. in fact they are killed less than white americans are per encounter. if you come to the attention of the police in america and they draw their guns on you, your chances of being shot appear to be slightly higher if you are white, at the moment. and that breaks everyone‘s expectations. this is fascinating because it gets to the heart of your intellectual approach

respect -- with compassion and respect. number the specific statistics, but it is staggering the number of people who lead fortune 500 companies who are immigrants or children of immigrants. i am an immigrant. my father was liberated by american soldiers and i will never forget how america welcomed him and us. able to have created thousands of jobs and be a part of america in many ways if i happen in welcome -- if i had not been welcome. there is a way to protect our borders with kindness and respect. people confuse kindness with weakness. it takes an enormous amount of strength to do a kind thing. it is very different from being nice. you can be nice and polite but to be kind, you have to be strong. you have to stand up to the bully. requires a protagonist force of action and that's what we need today. david: you are a very successful entrepreneur and this man. tell us how your business has done under donald trump and how it might be under joe biden. you have any concern there? i i have it in business since finished law sc

>> you know it's interesting he talks with respect to the economy and the united states about not going back to the way things who are not building back to the way things were before but building back better and he would apply the same basic logic to the approach to the world. we can't go back to the way it was before. what we have confronted in the world is different then when president obama and vice president biden took office. first we are dealing with a more assertive and more aggressive more risk-taking chinese common as party and chinese government and so while the obama administration initiated pivot and asia recognizing that the u.s. had elevated engaged in the u.s. pacific in a wide range of tools i think the nature of the u.s. china relationship in the u.s. strategy towards china will continue -- continue to evolve in the biden and. second the emphasis, the deep emphasis on defending democracy which has come under increasing attacks over the past several years so reinforcing the foundations of our democratic alliances and our democracy as well as our own democracy is a point

and we have to work together in a way that respects everyone's rights, and certainly respects the rights of black and brown people across this country. in doing so and putting together this panel, it was a dynamic panel indeed brought together from a cross-section, as i noted , of people who bring a wealth of knowledge and experience. i will start first in just introducing judge susie morgan, a federal district court judge in louisiana. she will be introducing herself momentarily. no stranger to this issue at all, presiding over decrees, having knowledge, information, and understanding of the process as it relates to policing, and the extent of those decrees, what the effectiveness is, what it looks like moving forward, and so it is a pleasure and a privilege to have her here. we also have traci burch, dr. traci burch, professor traci burch. she brings an academic perspective, a perspective of wisdom, a perspective of having to teach people and speak to people to flush out these issues in a classroom, to develop and work with bright minds moving forward, which will perhaps bring meaning

and respect others. i think that would go a long way frankly to stop republicans from somehow co-opting a quote unquote pro police platform when i really think that we're not making police officers or the people they police, that they are supposed to serve any safer by stoking divisions. republicans have been stoking those divisions for years now. and i think that joe biden could go much farther to say hey, wait a second, these are police officers who should be respected. they need to respect communities. this is not an either/or situation. no one needs good policing, fair, respectful policing better than communities of color, who are specifically living in high crime areas. and in new york city, we have a really big problem right now with crime this summer. the fear is there may be a slow down, that is something the police officers and unions have denied. i can't tell you one way or another that's going on or not. but there needs to be a basic level of respect from police officers who are public servant

i respect if you vote an exercise that. understand this. he is asking you to put him before your children. he is doing that in the schools by saying he wants to put the bulk of the money into schools that actually open up instead of recognizing the costs to opening up actually, virtually, online education and any hybrid of that. ofnning, when you see that the hundred largest school systems in the country, 62 of them are 100% virtual as of last week. so hybrid.en or partially virtual. percentagell actually opening 100%. we all want our children, grandchildren and my case to go to school. teachers want to teach. but we cannot risk our children of thosed the safety who make schools work whether it is teachers or support staff. but that risk. put them at risk. the president has just cited and you see at think it was just reversed but the secretary of all then was giving money she was giving to private schools which we want them to protect their children also to discretion about how they spend the money. but not in the public school system. wedn

covid-19, we need to be more respectful. respectful of the seniors. i seen a young boy 1920, muscles rippling arguing with a 60-year-old woman trying to check him out at the cashier. that is damn disrespectful, man. disrespectful for us to walk around as i said and not respect the work. these physicians and nurses have to go home to their family. they go to work to deal with this disease that is killing 163,000 people and people are playing like this is a joke. >> you mentioned disrespectful, i am always stunned if i am in a place with a sign on the door saying that you must wear a mask. someone comes in and does not wear a mask, it seems so disrespectful to the cashiers and the people that are taking the orders. it is disrespectful to the people not being paid enough to do it in the pandemic to be the ones policing masks. we are leaving it up to cashiers to face the brunt of the anger. >> ditto. that is what i am saying. they shouldn't have to argue with no young boy who is swelling up on her talking about his damn rights. he should be respectful to

and if they are treated with respect, there is absolutely no problem. i think you have a hard time finding that to be the case, that they are going to abuse you if you are treating them with respect and carrying out whatever orders have been given. by the same token, you know, we need probably some different types of training for certain police. if police have a record of being abusive to people, you know, we need to retrain those pulleys or take them off the floors. right now, there's not a good mechanism everyplace to do that. >> sandra: it was a powerful message from ryesha williams, listening to her story on the ground in minneapolis where you are seeing rising crime rates. something has to be done. we'll see what that city decides to do. so many other american cities dealing with it. dr. carson, thank you for caving on. >> the key is to listen and work together. >> sandra: joe biden getting testy when pressed about a cognitive test. >> no i haven't taken the test. why the hell would i take a test? come on, man. before you get on this program, you t

it was with respect to one particular scoring mechanism. we intervened quickly with the department of education, anifigd out what was going and it was cleared on the front end and it was the -- the model. >> so does this worry you as sort of a global problem, do you think you've got -- do you think that this is no longer occurring except in individual instances or do you think you need to continue? because i'm all for getting the word out. but i do think that that is fine but you need a stick. and just educating the furnishers may not be enough. so do i have your commitment to lay eyes on this problem from the perspective of being an enforcement agency as well as everything else that you do? >> senator, i give you one quick example, too, it our assessments we're sending examiners in to furnishers and we have a constant presence at the ncra to look at this. >> great. the c.a.r.e.s. act established a national eviction moratorium spanning multiple agencies and it also prohibits fees and penalties for missed payments during that time. you have

miss yates: with respect to general flynn, no. chmn. graham: so you did not know the fbi had a counterintelligence investigation of general flynn? miss yates: no. chmn. graham: the interview by general flynn by two fbi agent's, did you authorize that interview? miss yates: no. i think there was a legitimate basis for that -- chmn. graham: say again. miss yates: i did not authorize it because i was not told about it in advance, but that is not the same thing as a saying there was not a legitimate basis for it. chmn. graham: so you believe there was a legitimate basis for it? miss yates: yes. had evidence that the russians were attempting to influence the election. chmn. graham: the election was over. miss yates: if you will give me just a second, i will lay it out for you. chmn. graham: no. i will ask questions and you will give me answers. what was the basis of the general flynn interview? was it part of crossfire hurricane? ,iss yates: my understanding yes, it was. --n. graham: was it part right. please. we are talking now about the in

ship person have a lot of respect for. the u.s. president talks up his working relationship with the leader of the coronavirus task force after accusing dr deborah burke's of hurting his administration. the reason or silver bullet at the moment and there might never be. the world is warned not to put too much faith in a vaccine the world health organization says the pandemic could go on for a long time. hello and welcome i'm peter dhabi you're watching al-jazeera live from our headquarters here in the also ahead protesters returned to the streets of mali demanding the president resigns over the dire a commie and for failing to defeat armed groups. spain's former king juan carlos announces he's moving abroad as investigations continue into alleged corruption. the u.s. president donald trump has publicly rebuked the head of the white house coronavirus task force he's accused dr deborah burks of hurting the administration after she said the high number of infections and rural america represented a new phase in the pandemic dr burk's m

we are moving in this respect in the right direction.our people to improve, yet our people to reap the benefit of this great revolution, but i confidently believe we are moving in the right direction. but one big mystery which everybody is wondering about is, how can you try to implement these economic reforms when you change yourcaptain midship? the finance minister, ibrahim el—badawi, was among 7—8 key cabinet ministers who was removed from office in july. why did you do that? you know, the reshuffle we did injuly, it was motivated by three factors. number one — this is a government that listened to the people, to the public. you had a huge demonstration on 30 june, marking the first anniversary of that demonstration last year, and they demanded change on a number of fronts. the second reason is about teamwork. we would like to have ministers that will be working in a perfect teamwork within the cabinet, with the political front, and all that. but most importantly, it is also dictated by performance. the minister of finance and others,

we need to be more respectful. respectful of our seniors. i seen a young boy, you know, 19, 20 years old, muscles rippling. he's arguing with a 67-year-old woman who is trying to check him out at the cashier. that's just damn disrespectful, man. you know, it's disrespectful for us to walk around, as i said, and not respect the work that all the people did in seattle, new york. these physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists. they have to go home to their families. so, they go to work to deal with this disease, that's killing 100 -- where are we at now? 163,000? and people are playing like this is a joke. >> you know, you mentioned disrespectful. i'm always stunned, if i am in a place, you know, has a sign on the door that says, you know, you must wear a mask. somebody comes in, doesn't wear a mask, it seems so disrespectful to the -- the cashiers, to the people who are taking their orders. and it's, also, disrespectful that we expect those people, who are not being paid enough to do this, in this pandemic, to be the ones policing masks. tha

he has no respect for rule of law. no respect for democracy. no respect for any but himself or if we lose faith in this democracy, something that america has had for 200 and some 20 odd years, will be gone. we have to do everything we can so the election results can come out as quickly as possible. so if donald trump wants us to work it is claiming all these problems he can't turn your back on the fine print that is when will you help the state whether they are his allies are not to run these election so that's a first for the second as we know we are getting no that night. the media's going to have to be patient. there will be some bright resources. spheric or understand were pushing for repeal suspects not just on pushing it is a two-year appeal very important to the state, is done unfairly throughout america long island westchester, suburbs of buffalo and every other state. >> democrats redline this negotiation is there any room for you so we don't redline anything. this is why we believe the $600 is so important. one, we don't think people

she really respects him, gaining that respect through her relationship with joe's son. it was a powerful moment. no doubt about it. >> and certainly, bakari, it was clear that she had respect for him. for anyone who is saying what did that moment signify at the debate, it certainly did not signify that she did not have great respect for joe biden. >> i mean, no and i just want to say, and i think they actually do have a relationship that dates back, these aren't two people that they just measured together yesterday with a phone call. you know, you have to understand that obama, that kamala's relationship back to the obama administration, you think about those relationships that were cultivated, she ran the second largest justice department in the entire country, and so she wasn't, she's not someone that was out in left field, and did not have a relationship with joe biden, but what you're seeing, though, and i have to go back to this, that sense of family, i mean these american values that we always talk about, that sense of compassion, you saw the vice president, and i

respect mike pence. he has been a great vice president and i will take him over kamala harris and the horrible way she treated justice kavanaugh, that was a horrible event. i thought it was terrible for her and terrible for our nation. , thought she was the meanest the most horrible, most disrespectful of anybody in the u.s. senate. she is also known, from what i understand, as being just about the most liberal person in the u.s. senate and i would have thought biden would have tried to stay away from that a little bit because with what they are doing with open borders and sanctuary cities, where they are trying to protect sanctuary cities which is also protecting a large number of criminals, with all the things they are doing, second amendment, they want to take away your second amendment or modify it to a point where it is essentially no longer the second amendment, i would have thought it would have gone a different way. thank you very much. >> russia developed a vaccine today -- >> kamala harris -- >

miss yates: with respect to general flynn, no. chmn. graham: so you did not know the fbi had a counterintelligence investigation of general flynn? miss yates: no. chmn. graham: the interview by general flynn by two fbi agent's, did you authorize that interview? miss yates: no. i think there was a legitimate basis for that -- chmn. graham: say again. miss yates: i did not authorize it because i was not told about it in advance, but that is not the same thing as a saying there was not a legitimate basis for it. chmn. graham: so you believe there was a legitimate basis for it? miss yates: yes. had evidence that the russians were attempting to influence the election. chmn. graham: the election was over. miss yates: if you will give me just a second, i will lay it out for you. chmn. graham: no. i will ask questions and you will give me answers. what was the basis of the general flynn interview? was it part of crossfire hurricane? ,iss yates: my understanding yes, it was. --n. graham: was it part right. please. we are talking now about the in

our primary work with respect to taiwan is different from the trade piece of this. we've been diligent about making sure that we honored the commitments that we have made to the people of taiwan, including approving arms sales that are important so that the taiwanese can engage to protect their democracy. >> the administration's goal of complete verifiable, irreversible denuclearization of the korean peninsula remains? >> it does. >> thank you senator gardner. senatorre you involved in the decision to withdraw troops from germany? >> yes. >> according to senator esper, 6400 of those troops, so over half of those who will be removed from germany, will be coming back to the united states. they're not going to be going to parts of europe to deter russia, parts of asia to deter china. in fact, the only country that is publicly supported the removal of u.s. troops from germany to date has been russia. so, can you share with us whether the impact of this kooi decision to impact china and russia was taken into account and was there any strategic assessment done to support