let's bring in dw sports or respondent anthony howard. was this a harsh ruling?hony: it has been a public relations tug-of-war ever since it was announced in march. it is hard to understand which side is coming down on the side of truth. but really, they have been at war during this period. the defense was based around the fact that she did not realize the drug that was previously ok to take had been placed on to the banned list. the itf did not in fact, fight against that. but they said they agreed she did not intentionally go against the rules, but she had to take responsibility, even though that may be the case. if there is a surprise, it is a black-and-white nature. sarah: this is a sport where age really matters. the older you get, you're playing can become wobbly. do you think that that two year ban will stay in place, or is there wiggle room there? anthony: the spore will have to work that out, but between the lines here, how the itf made their case, that she is a big star with so much money and she did not have people to check this for her, she must take