or not revisit, we have to revisit it. >> dickerson: let me ask you finally about mosul, there are reports that 200 civilians have been killed as a result of a bombing in mosul, perhaps from an american air mission there. is this a result of the loosening of rules of engagement and how should people think about this? >> very sad development, obviously the department of defense is investigating, i don't believe this is as a result of any kind of loosening of rules of engagement. rather i think it is simply the facts on the ground for much of the last part of last year, the fighting was in east mosul which is a much smaller less densely populated area, now it is in west mosul which is a more densely populated area, the ultimately the blame lays with the islamic state, they fight from apartment buildings and homes, mosque, hospitals and schools and so forth. the blame does not lay with coalition pilots or with our, iraqi forces an investigation will occur but ultimately it is the terrorist whose are using civilians to shield that are responsible for the deaths. >> dickerson: senator cotton th

well, for a while, it did oblige me to revisit a book that i felt i had moved on from.it trying, although i always had to be mindful not to complain, because all my professional life, i had been waiting for a book to hit it big, so once i got what i claimed i wanted, i had to keep my mouth shut. i'm still proud of that book. every once in a while i have to go back to it and read a scene or a passage, and sometimes i think, hm, not so bad. you tackle some pretty big subjects in your books, including this one. and you've written about the health care system in america and obesity, to name a couple of others. how do you pick your subjects? ijust look for something that i have a strong reaction to, you know. and i'm not necessarily obliged in my own book to pick something controversial or in the headlines. although i sometimes do. but i'm just looking for something that i have a strong emotional reaction to. lionel shriver, you always give us plenty to talk about. thank you so much. pleasure. the weekend has brought a mix of weather. on saturday some of us saw the sunshine

so we would be revisiting health care even if hillary clinton had been elected president of the united states because obamacare is in a meltdown mode. obamacare's also saddled our economy with more than a trillion dollars in new taxes. most of those taxes are so hidden that most americans are probably not aware of the fact that there is even a tax charged on their premium for their health insurance policy, for example. well, all these taxes end up being absorbed and have to be paid by american families, and it's -- at its very core, the individual mandate of obamacare was a major power play and overreach by the federal government. basically, what it said is if you don't buy the government-prescribed health insurance plan, we're going to

revisiting it now as it comes out in paperback, what are your thoughts?hat are yourthoughts? bred well, it it comes out in paperback, what are your thoughts? bred well, it is bleaker now. one of the striking things about revisiting this book after the release in hardback is obviously that we now have a new president and not the president we expected. there is a feeling of not quite being overtaken by events, because what happens in the books has not happened yet, we haven't yet faced economic collapse, quite the contrary in fact, the stock market is going through the roof, though i'm not convinced it will stay like that, but certainly interests and dystopias has picked up enormously. i think the entire landscape of reality has changed, if that's not being a little overdramatic in that what we consider possible has changed. donald trump was initially not going to get elected and the idea of his being president was farcical and now look at him. similar with brexit. is a dystopian novel set in 2029, but this isn't a future of lizards running down fifth ave a

he even if chuck schumer were the majority leader, we would be revisiting obamacare. so the status quo would of been unacceptable. he house, senate, administration have all come together behind a proposal we confident will be a dramatic improvement over the status quo. we hope and expect to get that from the house sometime in the next few weeks. if so it will be on the agenda here in the senate in the april recess. in the weekihood before the final week when we are heading to the final supreme

the executive order drafting had interesting aspects but i expect it will be revisited -- revisited so will wait to see the final version. >> there is talk in congress of a different subjects using the congressional review act with of broadband privacy rules what would you like to have been moving forward? >> is very clear from what the chairman has said and what we've heard that a review of the title to position is happening. but as that happens on the privacy concerns one of our concerns in a rush to solve research and problem that have the same capability to miss those regulatory requirements. it is written with the big guys in the room so compliance is something that could be solved by the compliance compartment. when there is the staff of one and that person also has to wash dishes the compliance department is the development problem -- department increase problems . for example, be expect they will review free data. that is a proposal in part because if done right it can be a boon to make excessive will. and is open to the membership but we need to see how these proposals are sha

if hillary clinton had won the campaign, we would be revisiting obamacare. it has to change and we believe has to be changed in way consistent with many of the things the president recommended tonight. we anticipate coming p with a proposal that speaker, myself and president all agree on and trying to sell to all members because we anticipate no democratic support for this monstrosity. they're stuck with it. the american people want it, had elections about it. ready for us to tackle this and come up with a better health care program. >> thanks for joining us.

>> if you're going to extend this law, you would have to revisit.it would be a different climate. a different environment when you revisit. we have a gernor who said he would veto are any measure. you might recall our former governor signed it into law quicker than any bill that has ever been signed into law in this state. >> the reason they signed it, there's a veto proof majority in your legislature which still exists. the governor could veto anything. that super majority is still sitting out there srgs it not? >> it is but it has changed with regard to the experience of house bill two. at this point, at least in the senate, it would take 21 people to sustain the governor's veto. i'm confident that there are more than 21 people in the north carolina senate now. democrats and republicans who would sustain a veto of any measure similar to house bill two. >> do you expect -- >> the other thing that it does -- >> go ahead. i'm sorry. >> i was going to say, the other thing, there was some dispute over whether local governments had the authority to enac

whe ensure there are other actions that may be revisited i think we need to hit reset on both of these items. i'm glad to see that they have already started the process by staying certain parts of the rules that was set to go into effect last week. as i suspect everyone in this room knows i feel strongly that the best way to provide long-term protection is to pass bipartisan legislation. since we do not yet have agreement on that front despite goodwill on both sides, there's no reason for the fcc to hold off on doing what is necessary to rebalance the regulatory posture under current statutes. something tells me much of today's hearing will be dedicated to this topic. e

neil: going to revisit it though?'t that be interpreted let the health care thing rest a while? >> i think couple things are going on. the markets are convinced in order to get a decent tax reform package, the budget, it needs to be revenue newt -- neutral. i don't know if that is true or not. reagan did tax reform in '86. we weren't talking about fixing health care or social security and they just did it. they said supply sigh economics work. there are no supply-siders -- neil: doing that in divided congress. >> right, i can't stress how remarkable that was at time. >> tip o'neill and he sat down, let's do this what's a good way to do it. did it over probably couple drinks. neil: remember how reagan handled that. don't gawk, don't rub the other guy's face in it. that, we all have to look good in this. >> right. remember one other thing about the reagan administration then. you could say this about the obama administration. you could say this about the bush administration. they were monolithically, they were, idealogi

at what.do you go to congress and say we have to revisit? >> i would take issue with this. the executive orders that are being issued are to fix the executive orders that were reached before. i don't think qualitatively at the same. the past administrations at how many times, we've only issued so many executive orders and president bush did this many and we haven't done nearly as many of the previous administration. it's not the quantity is what they do it's the quality tate of aspect. there are a whole host of executive orders overreached, extended their authority. president trump is fixing that and keeping his promises. were going to use our executive powers to undo what the previous administration address. what comes next is an. >> somewhere it is a broad reform that is brewing in congress? >> not that i am aware of. that's not to say that there's not going to be discussion and dialogue through the confirmation process i've had several meetings privately with senators both democrat and republican that was an expression of interest at the clean air act was updated in 1990

for a while, it did oblige me to revisit a book that i felt i did oblige me to revisit a book that ifelt i had moved on from. and that got a little bit trying. i always had to be mindful not to complain, because all my professional life i had been waiting for a book to hit it big, so once i got what i claimed i wanted, i it big, so once i got what i claimed iwanted, i had it big, so once i got what i claimed i wanted, i had to keep my mouth shut. i'm still proud of that book. every once in a while, i have to go back to it and read a scene or a passage, and sometimes i think, not so passage, and sometimes i think, not so bad. you do with some pretty big subject in your books, including this one, and you have written about the system in america, and obesity, to namea the system in america, and obesity, to name a couple of others. how do you pick your subjects?” to name a couple of others. how do you pick your subjects? i just look something i a strong reaction to. i am not necessarily obliged in my own book to pick something controversial or in the headlines. though i sometimes do. but i'm

the question you're asking is it appropriate to renegotiate or revisit them? i think sometimes it probably is, but i just don't know the details of any particular agreement. what issues may arise. these are negotiated agreements between parties. those are always subject to revision if circumstances change. i would imagine there might be circumstances where you would have to revisit them. i certainly agree with you it's a valuable tool provided to us by the congress and in an appropriate case would need to use it. senator hirono: i take it with the 20 or so consent decrees currently in force, there may be times you might want to, because of circumstances have changed and meeting of the minds, but i hope that is not your intention to cast them aside. mr. rosenstein: i have no intent -- i just have no bay siffs information. i accept your representation. there are approximately 20 of them. i don't know the details. i know there's one currently under review in baltimore that has not been accepted by the court, but i'm not familiar with the details of the others. se

do you think it's a good idea to revisited? >> we have to address health care.ken. if nothing is done, the affordable care act is going to collapse on itself. president obama was very smart in putting all the things that were going to cause it collapse in the years that he was no longer going to be in office, so we have to do something. my difficulty with the proposed bill that we were scheduled to vote on last week was it didn't give the relief to the people who deserve it. >> to your knowledge nobody in the leadership has reached out, there is not a specific plan going forward to revisit this in the near future? >> well, i mean the cancellation of the vote just happened last friday, and we didn't come back until monday. and so i think there's time to regroup. we've had conferences, we've taun talked about this. everybody agrees our health care system is broken and needs to be repaired. everybody believes that the affordable care act is no longer affordable for people. so something has to be done. i credit the president for having an ambitious schedule. he want

so we have to revisit it. this is not what this country needs in that regard. i do think that there's some bipartisanship where we can have -- we can come together. it doesn't happen to be in his proposal. >> before you go, i need to ask you about a crude joke told by a democratic member of congress. >> before you go there, though, let me say about his speech, all of this that he's doing, the deflection is to deflect from the fact that he does not have a jobs bill, he does not have an infrastructure bill, he does not have any of the things he talked about, renegotiating nafta, has not made the communication with congress on all of that. understand this, this is the deflect -- where we started, the deflector in chief. no jobs, no infrastructure bill, no nothing and no major bill signed since he came to the white house. >> i need to ask you about this crude joke that was told this week by a member of your caucus, a democratic congressman richmond at the washington press club foundation annual dinner at the expense of white house counselor kellyanne conway. take a

he even if chuck schumer were the majority leader, we would be revisiting obamacare. so the status quo would of been unacceptable. he house, senate, administration have all come together behind a proposal we confident will be a dramatic improvement over the status quo. we hope and expect to get that from the house sometime in the next few weeks. if so it will be on the agenda here in the senate in the april recess. in the weekihood before the final week when we are heading to the final supreme gorsuch.ination of tracks we have a big agenda in the next few weeks appealing and replacing obamacare and replacing a new supreme court justice. american people have suffered too long under a bad health care law that needs to be repealed and replaced. it is patient-centered and more affordable for every american and we intend to deliver on that. i want to make one other observation about some of the work done here. the cra's that are being passed through congress are actually relief to regulatory businesses and people across his country. if you look at just those of already bee

of gop efforts to overhaul white house chief of staff reince priebus said the president may still revisitealthe seeking support from moderate democrats in es like tax hail warnings or opening fire on cmopolitan hote was robbedyeo. >> reporter: asroberts. >> at ball cap.an hotel guests >> he was close enough to hr co ar guest recorded three people mask.strange. heard the bellagi w incidents.as a touristvillarrea vegetables from vertical bi est. have a great day. >> new overnight a teenage istricight.phadelphia this morno attorney seth williamsment we'll explain who is behind the s isprot facing this morning. >>> and today is monday march 27th. good morning, i'm jim donovan. >> i'm jan carabeo. rahel solomon has t all of that plus the late shows ' bandleader john bat tees hon orders here in philadelphia. but first a check on the ca

well, for a while, it did oblige me to revisit a book that i felt i had moved on from.nce i got what i claimed i wanted, i had to keep my mouth shut. i'm still proud of that book. every once in a while i have to go back to it and read a scene or a passage, and sometimes i think, hmm, not so bad. you tackle some pretty big subjects in your books, including this one. and you've written about the health care system in america and obesity, to name a couple of others. how do you pick your subjects? ijust look for something that i have a strong reaction to, you know. and i'm not necessarily obliged in my own book to pick something controversial or in the headlines. although i sometimes do. but i'm just looking for something that i have a strong emotional reaction to. lionel shriver, you always give us plenty to talk about. thank you so much. pleasure. good evening. it has been a dry, spring day across many parts of the country and we had long spells of sunshine earlier on. this sunset was ca ptu red sunshine earlier on. this sunset was captured by one of our watchers. we have

think a more careful and deliberate approach which we now have time to do because we have to the revisit healthcare anyway would get us further down the path to solution. i believe both moderates and conservatives made a lot of concessions already, i have friends like jim jordan in the freedom caucus and jim dent, they are good men and want to work together and find a solution that both they and everyone inbetween can agree to with time i think we can do that. >> dickerson: so your judgment, so-so nobody mistakes your message is the house rushed it? >> i think the house immediate bit too fast, 18 days is simply not enough time for such major landmark legislation. >> dickerson: the president this morning, know is actually pointing fingers at the freedom caucus and said, quote, democrats are smiling in dc the freedom caucus with the help of the club for growth and heritage have saved planned parenthood and obamacare. what do you think about that? >> again, you know, it wasn't just conservatives in the house, in fact i think more nonconservatives than conservatives opposed it and the house

they will have to revisit that pure they will have to revisit their monetary policy if that is the case will indeed. it will be interesting to see. obviously, there has been a huge amount of political uncertainty over the last few years, really, and it has been balanced by super accommodative monetary policy, and clearly, today, we'll probably see the fed putting up an interest rate, but be question is going to raised in other central banks, to what extent do they merit that? i do not think it will be seen in interest-rate rises, but it will be in the qe programs. manus: i want to show you this chart. about shiller, he talked back in the 2000, the new era, you remember greenspan talked about the paradigm shift. here we are, the new era. he talks about a new leader being born. he is rather skeptical. vix is dropping, markets are rising. is there a touch of the emperor's new clothes or am i being rather grinch like in the cold? euan: maybe you are a bit cold in amsterdam, -- [laughter] euan: but i think the truth is that last time i was here, we did talk about the possibility of risk asse

at what point do you say we have to revisit these things legislatively? >> i would take issue with this in this regard. i think the executive orders that are being issued are to fix the executive orders that were reached before. i don't think qualitatively the same. the past administration said how many times, we have only issued some executive orders and president bush did this many and we haven't done as merrily as many. it's not the quantity that matters. it's what they do. it's the qualitative aspect of it. they threw a whole host of the executive orders overreach, extended their authority. president trump is fixing that. he's keeping his promise to say we are going use executive power to undo that which the previous administration address. what comes next? i think a legislative response, congressional response to these key issues. >> is there somewhere they brought in about a bill or series of bills brewing and congress? >> not that i'm aware of. that's not as it is not going to be discussion and dialogue to the confirmation process actually in sever

republicans will get laid for theye to revisit health care over and over again and they're not getting move on. nicole: they've got a parade. it had some market today. how will the bill change? what do you want to see change to make it more likely to be a better bill and not just obamacare life. >> i think they have to and all parts of obamacare private insurance overhaul. price controls on health insurance, mandated subsidies preferably by the end of this year. they need to block the medicaid program to target those funds to the people truly needy. people with preexisting conditions and others who can't have health insurance under him. they take steps to drive down the cost of health care, which the bill does not do. the way you do that is by expanding health savings account and the controller with $13,000 of earnings for employers out of control. they put downward pressure on prices and that they make up for a they make oscar folder bar for everybody. true to michael cannon at the cato institute committee met for joining us this morning. lauren: and sports can occur in texas. san ant

from you congress to actually control our .ederal spending i think we should get a commitment to revisit the let the public understand what that is and we sequester but without a required reduction in the departments but freeze the ederal budget and only allow increased spending for any program whether defense or not growth of the national productivity. host: we will take your idea. guest: good morning, sir. thank you for your question. appreciate it. as i said earlier if you ask me defense hawk or budget hawk i would say both. sequester, itt the as the worst case scenario if lawmakers didn't get the deal. that became law which is which reallye cuts hurt things like maintenance and raining schedules and the national security apparatus has been devastating. and i see it firsthand because where i live. that said, your point is well i think there's a lot of fat in budgets around the whole government and we should belt in many departments. even canada in the 1990's was to -- they were able to board andacross their get their budget in line because pretty big as like cuts around 20% for five y

looking for support from moderate democrats in the opens the possibility that the president could revisit health care legislation. in a tweet the president put the blame of the bill's defeat on members of the house's freedom caucus. >>> the influence of president trump's son-in-law is growing this morning. you can expect to see this story trending on your social media time line. jared kushner will lead a new office for streamlining and overhauling the federal government. it is designed to make government run like a business. >>> today a woman the secret service says has been busted for jumping fences at and near the white house three times in one week will be back in court. the big question is whether a judge will keep her behind bars this time. marcy wall was carrying a sleeping bag and backpack when she scaled one of the security fences near the treasury building yesterday. >> this is what we know. wall is from washington state. 38 years old. was first arrested tuesday after she was found dangling from the shoelaces of her sneakers on the white house pleaded not guilty and a judge order

at what point do you go to congress and say you need to revisit things legislatively? >> i would take issue in this regard. i think the executive orders that are being issued are to fix the executive orders that were reached before. so i then tdon't think qualitat it's the same. the past administration said how many times in well, we've only issued so many executive orders and president bush did this many and we haven't done nearly as many as the previous administration. it's not the quantity of the executive order that matters. it's what they do. it's the qualitative aspect of it. and they through a whole host of executive orders overreached, extended and enlarged their authority. president trump is fixing that. he's keeping his promises to say we're going to use our executive power to undo that which the previous administration addressed. now, what comes next is i think a legislative response, a congressional response to these key issues. >> and is there a broad environmental reform bill or series of bills brewing in congress somewhere? >> not that i'm aware of. that

visit ncicap.org] xx ♪ >>> this week on wealthtrack we revisit our timely exclusive outlook with walls king economist ed hyman. next on consuelo mack "wealthtrack." ♪ >> new york life, along with mainstay's family of mutual funds, offers investment and retirement solutions so you can help your clients keep good going. ♪

adid not come to revisit history we are all familiar with or to say that one historical narrative is wrong and another is right. ok,ink the question is, what now? israelis and the outstinians do from here on and what should the policy be to end this conflict that has gone end this long and to occupation to create a better and more secure future for shoes, arabs, israelis, and palestinians. -- palestinians? know, thisyou all much fromas taken so so many. gains when israel spends an enormous part of the budget on the military and nobody gains one gaza is obliterated and thousands are made homeless. children andwhen young men and women are trained to become suicide bombers. , year after when year, decade after decade, the hatred,about war and rather than peace and development. think for a moment about the incredible potential that is being lost when israelis and palestinians are not coming together to address the environmental and economic challenges of the region. remember the years ago when i got a small sum of money. it was not a whole lot. bringing people from the region together an

. ♪ y ♪ >>> this week on "wealthtrack" during public television's fundraising drive we revisit our interviewgotham asset management joel. why did he provide a fund combining passive with long-term strategies. that's next on consuelo mack "wealthtrack." ♪ >> new york life along with mainstays family of mutual funds offers investment and retirement solutions so you can help your clients keep good going. >> additional funding provided by thornburg investment management, active

also, white house chief of staf but may revisit the health care legislation in the future.c senate leader chuck schumer says his party is willing to work with republicans on fixing obamacare, but repealing the program is off the table. >>> meanwhile, public hearings set for next week as legislators take a closer look at new jersey governor chris christie's final budget proposal. the $35 billion plan is expected consequences. new jersey's pension payout is expected to grow overec td to t estate taxes. experts warn whoever becomes th taxes. >>> ten minutes befor des are g second cha a. the humane society rescued 46 dogs from a south korean meat will come to philadelphia nited shelters to be put up for adoption. the humane society has helped to farms. >>> a lot going on. a lot of "nbc10 news today" at . first, getting rid of asking. we'll explain why. >>> the sbroadway. we'll tell you where berks co in the spotlight. >>> the debate over leggings. we'll break down the uproar after an airline banned two teenagers from a flight over their choice of pants. this is the silverado sp

time to revisit that.hile, the maryland women are moving on to the sweet 16 and everybody is still talking about that. destiny's incredible shot at the end of the half. nothing but net. maryland awaits w oregon-duke game. and the head coach loves the business like approach from the team. >> all year it's putting your head down and control what you can control. you hear players talk about it. so they live it. it's just not some kind of thing we do. it's just controlling what is in front of you. a group that is driven. erin: i love it. the wizards are in boston tonight and tip-off is 7:30. you can't see the shot enough. >> how do you cover that? erin: how do you practice that? michelle: steve, final check? steve: warm day tomorrow. temperatures make it to the middle 50's. 45 on wednesday. thursday morning for cherry blossoms could be a problem. temperatures only in the 20's. look at the lower 70's. michelle: thank you. "world news tonight" with david muir coming up next. jonathan: we will s bp engineered a f

we don't have a choice to revisit or not revisit it. we have to revisit it. >> back home over the weekend democrats were met with cheers from california to vermont, but republican senator lindsey graham was met with the opposite in south carolina. >> here's what i think about health care. obamacare is a disaster and it's going to collapse. >> and republicans have another big worry on the to pass a major spending bill or face the possibility of a government shutdown and they're going to have to find some unity to to it. charlie? >> thanks, chip. susan page is "usa today's" washington bureau chief. welcome. >> thank you. >> looking at obama ar, what is specifically next? >> it's damaging for one part because he's weakening by demonstrating he couldn't deliver on this fundamental promise. it also raises questions about white house operation on their ability to build a coalition with congress. on an issue like tax reform, we heard the treasury secretary steve mnuchin. tax reform may be the toughest of all. >> they have to scale down ambitio

are you ready to revisit the way in which uk sport considers the importance of funding?ward success, we invest in potential. so the results... you punish lack of success. no, we don't, we enquire as to whether that success has not been achieved, and we invest in future potential. so the real results, we make the investment decisions after london. we'd already invested in real, and you can see is the example with badminton, who achieved medal success in rio, we are investing in the future potential. so this is about how the investment and the relationship is being interpreted, and clearly it's not been interrupted by everybody in the right way. so we've got to communicate better, the sports have got absolutely communicate better with the athletes and support their athletes in a more rounded sense, but i do see this as, yes, it's uncomfortable, but it's right that athletes are speaking out, and it is right but we all acknowledge that something's going to change, and it will do over this next cycle. you were reported last week as saying two other governing bodies that what

that i am concerned here more than normally of this president is if you saw that and if it is like revisitismnd he's going back to the normal trump and he's discuss covering all kinds of weird stuff o f the american not being a native national and he said all of these as of factual information and not speculations and this time he said that i got information handed that i am going to present it. this is strange. i am afraid of the word "liar," i hate that word. he's saying stuff that it seems to be completely making up again. now, go back to your point, congresswoman, what is the work, what is this political leaders like theresa may and merkel, what are they dealing with this kind of guy who's capable of making stuff that does not exist. >> right, i do think that at some point, we need to call what it is. it is lying. he doubles down and he puts his facts in terrible positions. i feel sorry for sean spicer today. he had to double down and defend this. it makes no sense. how can you continually say this when all the leaders o f the intelligence committee in the house and senate are saying it i

we might as well continue that theme and revisit the high def doppler where we've got a few light showers. light rain at santa rosa. elsewhere mostly to partly cloudy skies. in san francisco and south san francisco a few light showers making their way ashore. more in the next few hours. on futurecast we've got this such as it is. main band of a weak cold front tonight. not much rain with this. couple of tenths of an inch perhaps. a few hours overnight with the low pressure in the pacific northwest. a winter weather advisory posted at 8:00 tonight through 8:00 tomorrow morning. possible snow with levels down to 4,000 feet by 7:00 tomorrow morning. three to six inches of snow. a little bit more snow will mean slick roads and it will affect visibility as well. tomorrow things clear out. monday morning off to a partly sunny start. temperatures in the low 50s as we head back to work. overcast on the golden gate bridge. dark, menacing clouds. not all that threatening. but that's where some of the rain is coming down. 62 at concord. san francisco 60 degrees. and santa rosa 54. winds out of the s

and in the next hour we revisit the kelly family.been pretty unreal, we didn't expect any kind of attention like this at all. certainly never had anything like this in our life before. got to the point where we had to turn off the phones and facebook and twitter. we find out how the family is doing after their interview went viral. good evening and welcome to bbc news. theresa may has called the passing of the so—called brexit bill — the legislation that allows her to start the process of exiting the european union — a defining moment for the united kingdom. yesterday nicola sturgeon announced her intention to hold a second independence referendum because of the uk government's approach to the brexit talks. mrs may told mps that any deal she reaches with the eu will work for the whole of the uk. this will be a defining moment for our whole country, as we begin to forge a new relationship with europe and a new role for ourselves in the world. we will be a strong, self—governing, global britain. with control once again over our borders

you might want to revisit it. two things -- the trojan horse and the white elephant c. we put a hundred billion dollars fromsocial security and medicaid and we give tax breaks to the rich to pass this through. now they want to take the tax breaks from the rich back and pull the trigger on the hand grenade and pass it to the states to bankrupt the state's. i see it as emergency managers being placed. now the white elephant has to do vetting.gration and the have handed over contracting rights to run the database for all these people who are coming to israel. all these muslim and it seems like it is oil in the water and no one is talking about it. host: features and left them, -- beatrice in texas. what is on your mind? caller: i'm wondering if louie gohmert can go on one news. host: on what? caller: one news. host: what are you referring to? caller: louie gohmert, i would like to have an go on one. he needs to talk to black people. host: are you need his district? are you in his district? we have lost her. we showed you earlier, the prime minister of britain, theresa may,

adults revisiting the book, one writing the story makes me emotional. >> he just takes and takes and then eventually every that he was trying to take and wanted was all gone. >> as soon as you become a parent that is inherent. we give and give and give. but i don't think that we practice that with each other. >> lesson on giving and kindinize no matter what stage of life. we talked to the homeowner and they said they had to cut down the tree because it was lifting the sidewalk. now a stump for the neighborhood. your family did this and wrote this. this is your favorite book. why? >> i just love how generous the tree is . to the boy. and how even the -- you could, like, feel the -- the tree shows how -- she feels about the boy and really teaches people how to give and to be generous to other people, even -- yeah. >> reporter: no matter what. >> no matter what. >> reporter: this is a popular book among children here and now a lesson for adults as they are walking by. back to you. >> good. thank you. >>> getting a look at what will be waiting for warrior fans at the team's new mission b

chief of staff reince priebus left the door open for revisiting healthcare legislation. chuck schumer said democrats and republicans have idea on how to improve the affordable care act, but is not an's. >>> option. >> a funnel cloud was spotted near the town of ada70 miles southeast of oklahoma city. in denton, texas, softball hail fell in the area shattering windshields. >> we're dealing with issues this morning. >> reporter: the first one showing up on radar. storm tracker 6 live double scan showing there is rain out there, most of it supplanted in the northern suburbs. in allentown and reading you can see a little bit of the steadier stuff. i'll go in tighter in a second. outside we go on sky6 live hd we can see the fog, it's hard to see a thick. be careful through the i-95 corridor and south jersey in particular, there's dense fog, you can't see the bridge, i know it's a little bit of a distance, it's not that far away. as we take a closer look at radar, the rain we have up and down the i-95 corridor and willow grove and norristown, light nuisance stuff for the most

how will you decide when you revisit existing precedent? >> mr. chairman, i don't think the considerations change. it's the same analysis that i would have as a supreme court justice if i'm fortunate enough to be confirmed than i have when i'm considering circuit press didn'ts a ses -- precedence as a circuit judge. it's the exact same process. >> this is the 14th supreme court hearing that i participated in so i have a pretty good idea of some of the questions that you're going to get today. you're going to be asked to make promises and commitments about how you'll rule on particular issues. now, they won't necessarily ask you that directly, for instance, how will you rule on this issue or that issue. instead they'll probably ask you about old cases, whether they were correctly decided. of course that's another way of aski the very same question. they know that you can't answer but they're going to ask you anyway. i've heard justices nominated by president of both parties decline to answer questions like these. that's because as the nominee put i

manytive order draft had interesting aspects to it, but i think it will be revisited. i will wait until we see the final version. also, in congress, there is talk on a different subject. using the congressional review act to potentially go back some of the fcc broadband privacy rules that is something that the app association has spoken out before. what would you like to have happen to those rules moving forward? morgan: it is very clear from what the chairman is said, we have heard from congressional republicans in this administration that the review sec's position is important. as that review happens, whether it be on the privacy concerns, it had questions that will be filed, one of our concerns was in a rush to sell the certain problem, they were potentially creating lots of problems for -- create lots of problems for certain issues. with theon is written big guys in the room in the big guys have the lawyers, so compliance is something that can be solved by a compliance department. my member companies have a staff of one and that person is also having to wash dishes

argument that with interest rates as low as they've been, perhaps that owed formula needs to be revisited. so if you're getting closer to retirement, in this market environment, what would you recommend people do? >> so we think it is an antiquated solution to depend on fixed income for your lifestyle. peep are living longer today. although innation is low, it is a real thing. theon thing that would help you keep space to have exposure to stocks. so again, a balance type portfolio with high quality bonds, as the stocks go up over time. what we recommend people to do. find out the income you need. segregate the amount of money for two years worth of income. keep it in a reserve. keep your portfolio. it dpoenlds a liquid cash account to pay your income. we call it income distribution planning. using the reserve account. the balanced portfolio is never taken more than two years to recover. >> quickly, this has been a brutal time for savers. do you expect savings rates to go up in any meaningful way? on cds and bank accounts? >> they will eventually. they lag. the federal overnight rate will

how will you decide when you revisit existing precedent? >> i don't think the considerations change. it's the same analysis that i would have as a supreme court justice, if i'm fortunate enough to be confirmed, that i have what i'm considering circuit precedent as a circuit judge. it's the exact same process. the exact same rules apply. >> this is the 14th supreme court hearing that i've participated in so i have a pretty good idea of some of the questions you're going to get today. you're going to be asked to make promises and commitmented about how you'll rule on particular issues. now they won't necessarily ask you that directly, for instance, how will you rule on this issue or that issue. instead they'll probably ask you about old cases, whether they were correctly decided. of course, that's another way of asking the very same question. they know that you can't answer, but they are going to ask you anyway. i've heard justices nominated by presidents of both parties decline to answer questions like these. that's because, as the nominee p

trump said it's time to move forward, they will revisit healthcare but did not indicate when. >>> charlieoke to "eyewitness news" after they pulled the bill. he was among several planning to vote against the legislation. >> i don't know when that will be but if we do. we need to do it differently, and so i suspect the next order of business will be tack reform and infrastructure and there will be plenty to do. today was difficult for a lot of people. but the sun will come up tomorrow. >> president trump is willing to work with democrats on a bipartisan healthcare bill in the future. >>> detectives are investigating a murder mystery, a mother and her young son killed in south jersey. the story is unfolding on fox meadow drive in maple shade burlington county, david spunt has the latest that's generating national attention. >> reporter: a gruesome scene on this maple shade street as a father arrived home to find his 38-year-old wife and 6-year-old son dead. someone stabbed them. >> they were close. him and his son. >> reporter: that's the voice of a neighbor who didn't want to show her face

has spent his career revisiting bible stories.st love story, adam, eve and us." >> adam and eve. eve especially victims of the greatest character assassination ever. >> filer's book inspired an adam and eve approach to couples therapy with, marriage counselors. ellen bader and peter pearson. >> you never hear anybody talk about just adam or just eve. it is always adam and eve. >> reporter: the idea being to help people get past the blame game and face life's challenges together. after adam and eve were banished from eden, they stuck together. >> the two walk out of paradise, hand in hand, toward a far happier place. >> hand in hand with wandering steps and slow took their solitary way. >> exactly. again there you see what love really is, mix of independence. >> walk off into the sunset. >> together. but also alone. right. independent but interdependent. >> a marriage that had ups and downs and lasted 1,000 years. >> exactly. and it is, it is still there. 3,000 years later as an example of what a healthy, resilient, real relationsh