the basis that the revocation was proper based on the evidence presented at the revocation hearing before the san francisco police department. so on that motion -- [roll call] >> okay. so that appeal is denied, and the revocation is upheld. thank you. okay. we are now moving onto item number 8, this is appeal number 18-058, connie mar versus san francisco public works bureau of urban forestry. the -- [inaudible] >> -- which was denying the request to remove two significant trees with replacement on private property, order number 187562, and we will hear from the appellant first. you have seven minutes. >> thank you. thank you. i was told that i could do a powerpoint presentation. i'm sorry. i'm new to this. i'm not sure how i can do that, but i do have -- >> you can use the powerpoint. we have -- >> okay. >> i don't have a stick with me. i have it on mine, so i apologize. >> unless you want to show it under the overhead. >> i can do that, as well, and i can also give you hard copies, as well, since i produced those. >> go ahead. pass it down. >> so -- >> we'll share. >> is there enough co

is it only enterprise, those two cases that occurred before you issued the revocation? >> i'd have to look at some of the dates, but i have other victims. i just -- the ones that i -- you've got to realize that a lot of victims that i have on paper are not going to show up here, and i could read them off verbatim to you, but that's just going to be my words coming from them. so these are actually -- yes, these are all post after our last -- and i wanted to bring these people here because these are all post after our last hearing here. this is how many complaints i get weekly these people come through. i can bring you the old ones, and i can show them to you all day long, but i don't think it does the justice to the victims to let them speak for ems thises. >> you have something -- themselves. >> you have something to say regarding that question, officer. >> i have officer roqua from c.h.p. to provide testimony with respect to the papers submitted that occurred before the initial evidentiary hearing. >> this was the one adjacent to the freeway at the shell station? >> th

this is jose badillo doing business as jose's towing, appealing the revocation on february 14, 2018 of a tow car firm permit -- >> madam clerk, i need to take a break. >> okay. yeah. sure, >> okay. welcome back to the june state it's one where should the fifth vote be important to the final decision, we will automatically continue it ourselves. >> okay. thank you. >> okay. so -- >> does the department have -- you want to talk to the continuance? >> we would object to that, commissioners, because i am here representing the police department, and we do have multiple victims and witnesses prepared to give testimonial evidence as set forth in the exhibits to the department's papers. >> let's proceed. >> okay. so we will start with the police department presenting their case. you have seven minutes. >> good evening, commissioners, i'm ronnie wagner for the san francisco police department, and i would like to call rob pornaris from the san francisco police department. and i would like to ask that the multiple witnesses and victims that we do have just get ready over against the wall so that

when you get a revocation notice, it says you have 60 days to clear it up.xperience, day to day, you can go to a court, cite hardship, make arguments, et cetera. >> shannon: you're talking 100 days total from the time of the judgment, or the license is gone for good if you haven't made any reparations. when i put this case out to social media, and our viewers who are the jury in these cases, there was a lot of tough love out there. people saying, if you can't handle this, don't drive a car, don't break the law, don't break the fines, or use public transportation. eric, how do you respond? >> shannon, this is not necessarily someone who is a drunk driving, these are speeding violations. a lot of people simply can't afford it. yeah, doug makes interesting points. but when you have so many people, for example on social security, who make only $1,200 or $1,400 a month, they can't pay it. what the courts are not doing is offering some other type of like community service or some other type of means for those who can't afford it. >> shannon: doug, i know that the

shannon: the aclu said the revocations team punishes impoverished residents in violation of federal areing away crucial means of self-sufficiency and pushing them into poverty. 436,000, i can't imagine those are all cases of the poverty issue. >> a little context. and the drivers license, failure to pay the fine. i understand what eric is saying. somebody who cannot pay the fine, that is when issue but mixing apples and oranges a lot of people have money to pay the fines and don't pay it. the first is the statistical -- how many people fall into category a, they have the money or in the lawsuit the notice gives them 60 days, when you get a revocation notice you have 60 days to clear it up. and site hardship. heather: 100 days total, the license is improper. and when i put the case to social media and viewers who are the jury, there was a lot of tough love out there, if you can't handle this don't drive a car, and how do you respond? >> this is not someone who is drunk driving but speeding violations and when you have so many people on social security who only make $1400 a month and $400

now is being done on the same day that manafort has to file his papers in opposition to the bail revocation request that's due tonight. there will be a hearing next friday and the indictment's already in place. if you thought the government wasn't taking this seriously, they are. i do think the lead story is that they need to convict him in order to cooperate him. he's clearly not interested in doing it now. and then signed up his son-in-law, signed up his business partner and it's not working. so they need to convict him. >> it seems clear he's not going to cooperate. what about kk who has very interesting circumstances fled from ukraine to russia. there's an allegation the ukrainians let him go as a kind of tacit quid pro quo because they were trying to land an arms deal with the u.s. government. >> that's right. the ukrainian government was really in the crosshairs of the trump administration partly because of manafort. manafort was telling trump even during the campaign before he was sort of forced off in august of 2016, hey, the ukrainians are it out to get you and using me in this eff

republic of north macedonia once that's been given away it's been recognized by the greek state it's a revocable article two also also promises that greece will invite the former yugoslav macedonia to join nato next month for the nato summit even though that invitation is conditional the on the former yugoslav macedonia ratifying everything in parliament or a referendum and passing constitutional amendments when the time comes for final ratification and full access into nato if every other member of nato has abandoned the greeks on this and has gone ahead and done so without the lesser of this agreement being on in the north then the greeks will be isolated within nato and it'll be politically very expensive for them to hold that position for very long they will effectively be surrounded they will be the ones in the minority within nato not the northern macedonians that is the concern that scenario is the concern of the conservative opposition who said that once you've issued this letter of invitation conditional or not you've effectively allowed them in and this is it going to be extremely diff

of north macedonia once that's been given the way it's been recognized by the greek state it's a revocable article two also also promises that greece will invite the former yugoslav macedonia to join nato next month for the nato summit even though that invitation is conditional. on the former yugoslav macedonia ratifying everything in parliament or a referendum and passing constitutional amendments when the time comes for final ratification and full accession into nato if every other member of nato has abandoned the greeks on this and has gone ahead and done so without the lesser of this agreement being on in the north then the greeks will be isolated within nato and it will be politically very expensive for them to hold that position for very long they will effectively be surrounded they will be the ones in the minority within nato not the northern macedonians that is the concern that's another area is the concern of the conservative opposition who said that once you've issued this letter of invitation conditional or not you've effectively allowed them in and it isn't going to be extremel

think about the future, i would say in the near future we can probably affect -- expect a violent revocation, another long-range missile test, and a nuclear test. might talk about what definition of the provocation is. it is an attack meant to inflict casualties. north korea is likely to inflict a violent attack meant to inflict casualties sometime within the next year or two. a cold, my wife says it is because i smoke cigars too much but what do she know? stabilitys talk about and north korea. i think that is very important. let me talk about stabilityn the military first. does anybody know what kim jong-un did, what his first act was? his first act in 2011, the day his father died, was military order number one. no kidding. that was to bring all of the north korean troops training in the field back on. they came back home for that mourning period they had for his father. there were signsf dissent even then. some think the gestapo, that's what they are, russians and discipline -- rationing and problem.e was a during the winter training exercise that north korea has every year that runs from

do we know about any deals with that company and the revocation it would have -- ramifications it wouldenny: we reported there was a deal in the works and supposedly nearing that deal. nothing has been signed, that's what we know from the commerce department. they caution the final details have not been figured out. it could still fall apart. we saw how the rate from both sides of the island capitol hill. members here think that cte is a national sick -- zte is a national security threat. they see no reason to let the sales ban. president trump says is doing this as a personal favor to and we know the chinese have made a precondition -- the sales ban lifted on them to engage in other talks. this on a day when the trade deficit narrows to t lowest since september, exports rising to a record. thanks to jenny leonard, bloombs trade reporter. facebook is our stock of the hour, down 1.5 plus percent. the social network had news they had more data sharing partnerships not shared with users. emma is here. this involved the chinese again. user data withed chinese makers. has a mainly security t

let's get some more right now on manafort's bail revocation and a possible pardon for it. the president used a phrase that he often does on people he does wind up pardoning, very unfair. we tweeted this statement. and all of the others. very unfair. let's get some perspective from jeffrey toobin and allen dershowitz. thanks for joining us. jeff you were inside that federal court today, president trump tweeted that it was very unfair. what's unfair about jailing someone who allegedly committed a crime who was out on bail. >> paul manafort walked in that courtroom not knowing if he will be walking out. and what the prosecution said was he was instructed as a, in his original bail application, you cannot commit more crimes while you are out on bail. he has now been indicted for witness tampering, while he was out on bail, contacting these witnesses and trying to get them to tell a false story and he has been locked up. it changes the complexion of the trial coming up. hugely different to be waiting in prison to go to trial and to be waiting in the luxury apartment in alexandr

concerns whether from large companies like amazon or facebook or from small companies, and freely set revocable permissions such we can create new kinds of value by creating that data, in an economy that has that kind of free flow information, security and control that's based on the individual will be a society that's far greater in nieinnovan than we have currently today. >> can a facebook user right now view how they are targeted with the ad targeting, with predictive analysis? can they see that? can i see how i'm viewed? what cohort i'm put in? can i change that? can i determine what cohort i want to be in? >> not exactly, no. you can with a new tool that's been announced but has not yet been rolled out called ad transparency. i'm looking to the expert to the left. that will be the case partially. however that conol piece is very limited at this point. i don't think it should be, but it is. >> do you have anything to add to that. are you the expert that we were looking at? >> there are a set of tools, one is your interest manager that many advertisers provide and those are essentially the c

going to continue it monitor this because this is one of the permits that the commission vote today revoc. as a part of that, they're not allowed to have live entertainment ever again, so the city has been in contact with us regarding these complaints, so we're working with the police department as well to see if they're having entertainment or not. >> there's a group of ongoing complaints. if you have any questions about those, please let me know. i did want to point out that we visited hue friday night to inspect the most recent changes to their security plan. unfortunately they were closed by the time we got there for the 2:00 out. i think we arrived at about 1:45, and security gates and doors were shut, so we weren't able to verify the new security conditions. let me see if there's any other inspections that i wanted to point out. lusk is a new rooftop that we will be bringing into compliance after a complaint. flywheel roastery is a little coffee shop in the haight that we'll be bringing into compliance. that was also a neighbor complaint. bistro sf, noise complaint. we're going to t

three years if the project is not moving forward, we would schedule a hearing for you to consider revocation. it wouldn't automatically mean that it went away -- >> president hillis: i'm not a big fan of use-it-or-lose-it because if the economy dips -- everybody thinks things are not getting built because of construction costs. we'll just be back here with projects again and making people go through the process. it sounds good, but i've yet to meet the developer that's not building their project becauser that just waiting around for something even better to happen. i think it's construction costs or the economy dips. i think it's the rare case that -- it's just not great. prices are crazy. we can sell for a lot of money, but we're not building it because we think it will get better. i don't know. there's a lot of building happening. the use-it-or-lose-it makes the project worse. >> commissioner richards: i don't think it's that we'll take it away. you have to come back and tell us why. we'll check the records and see if the project was on the market the day after we approved it. >> president

it is not a permit or license revocation hearing. there's separateps to do that, and we don't have that in front of us. so just know and for the members of the public who think that we're voting on revoking this permit, that's not the case. what we're trying to determine if we want to add conditions or modify existing conditions or take some away. i think what they have asked is to have basically entertainment until 2:00 a.m. every day of the week. what it is now is to end at midnight on sundays through thursdays, at 1:00 a.m. on fridays and 2:00 a.m. on saturdays. so that's only one night that we allow it until 2:00. as i said, i wish we had different evidence in front of us because i want to allow you all to have seven days a week of entertainment. i think we generally want to not he 5 different conditions on any of our permits because if you're running it properly and -- and running it well and safe -- safely w're not going to see you here all the time. so that said, you know, i know that there's concerns about your treatment by s

this and prosecutors move on witness tamp eveering very quic and judges almost always grant it, revocation of bail under these kind of circumstances. i think this is absolutely the right move that mueller and hiss team did. i think the judge basically vindicated that by her ruling and her words. you can't do this. we expect -- the whole criminal justice system depends on witnesses when they get on the stand taking oath and telling the truth. manafort was clearly trying to mess with that system and the judge is having none of it. >> let me ask you a follow up question in terms of what his options are. what about a pardon even before trial or is this case where he would have to go through the whole process and a trial and if convicted then face a pardon? the president is obviously been sending a lot of signals that he's very easy with these pardons. >> reporter: i think that technically the president can pardon him at any time. although, he wouldn't know all the crimes that he needed to pardon him for really until he was convicted and he was sure there were no more superceding indictments co

what's really shocking about this turn of events this week -- and given the bail revocation earlier this week, this is not really a sprurprise to charge them. they laid out the case in detail. if you go back to the indictment, there is -- i was looking over it. there's a sentence in there that says a principle for what's called company "a" got talking points fromle paul manafort about what they should say about their inquiries into lobbying in the united states. the guy writes, the principle for that company "a" writes. we'll do that, but heaven knows what the employees might say. immediately after that indictment is filed, paul manafort reaches out to those employees and tries to convince them to lie, to stick with his talking points, which is an outright lie. the hutzpa that paul manafort has shown in the face of these charges is shocking. he's using his alley who has been reference in the some of mueller's papers as person "a," he used him as an intermediary to do this obstruction. right now, he's in russia and i don't think there's any expectation to bring hime here. >> do you think

the fact that manafort would go to this length, that he would potentially be risking a revocation ofis bail, additional charges, this evidence can also be used during the trial against him if he is trying to get witnesses to make false statements tells you how desperate paul manafort is. i have to think he is merely digging the hole deeper. quite naive to think bob mueller is not going to be on top of this. >> you speak also as a former federal prosecutor. could this pressure by mueller lead manafort to flip, plead guilty, cooperate and hope for a reduced sentence? >> it could. it's additional pressure. if manafort is remanded into custody, he may have more time to think about whether he wants to cooperate. if manafort faces potential new charges. it's potentially a signal to manafort that the witnesses are referred to in thert pleadings are cooperating with mueller. he may not have been aware of that until there was this effort to revoke his conditions of bail. >> mueller sends a very powerful message in that document. rudy giuliani, the president's lawyer, told our chris cuomo that

republic of north macedonia once that's been given away it's been recognized by the greek state it's a revocable. well there are geographical political and historical elements to this long running feud and they date back to the ancient king alexander the great journalist. says these issues are now being inflamed and even exploited by nationalists both in greece and in macedonia mainly they fear that the not in macedonia is going to steal the great history and they also fear of further thunder territorial claims because nationalists in macedonia have as an idea that this island again will be the capital of mr dyer so these are the two main reasons and also this appears in my personal opinion beginning from the nationalist parties and the opposition in graves which see that the agreement was probably the worst thing that has happened in greece for the past twenty five years the nationalist basically what they are saying is that alexander the great is greek was quick macedonia is great and no one else has the right to claim this name because it belongs to grace and everybody else because there will

investigate that a little bit more, and when they felt comfortable going before the judge to ask for bail revocation, that's when they would file this motion. but it will likely end up in court. the risk they run is that those witnesses may be asked to teifif the judge doesn't just accept the government's representation, and then the defense lawyers get t crack at cross-examination before the trial. >> isn't this also a version of tightening the screws using a power drill now? it just got even tougher for manafort. >> yes, and it continues to get tougher for paul manafort. a lot of people wonder why he is not cooperating, and i think one thing to consider is that somebody who is willing to tamper with witnesses is not rationally thinking enough to understand that cooperating is perhaps his best end game here. >> wow, well put. robert costa, we're coming to you next, and that is this was almost two days in the life of the trump administration. number one, the first half of the day was taken up with this legal question. can the president self-pardon, and wouldn't that, by extension, truly put him abov

what's really shocking about this turn of events this week and given the bail revocation moon earlier this week, this is not really a surprise to charge them. they really laid out their case in quite detail, but if you go back to the indictment, there is -- i was looking over it and there is a sentence in there which says that a principal for what's called company "a" got talking points from paul manafort about what they should say in response to any inquiries about their lobbying in the united states. they sent back a list of talking points. then the guy writes, the principal for this company "a" writes, heaven -- we'll do that, but heaven knows what the employees might say. immediately after that indictment is filed in february 23rd, paul manafort reaches out to these employees and tries to convince them to lie to stick with his talking points, which is an outright lie. the chutzpah that paul manafort has shown in the face of these charges is truly shocking. he's using his ally, kilimnik, who has been referenced in some of mueller's papers as person "a" who has some connection to ru

looks new the eye and says if you commit another crime while on release your bail is subject to revocation and you will winds up in custody. i have seen it.that. i can think of one case where someone was arrested driving 180 miles an hour on the george wash bridge. he went right into jail. you are not allowed to do this. you said people are telling him to stop. one of then is probable we list lawyer. >> two things mueller has done, filed the complaint and the superseding indictment. two ways to interpret that. they are ratcheting up the pressure and the other is they are exas per rated with this guy who won't stop breaking the law. which do you think it is. both, actually. they clearly want him in. this is done on the same day that manafort has to file his papers and opposition to the bail request. if you thought the government wasn't taking this seriously. they are. i think the lead story is that they need to convict him in order to cooperate. he's clearly not interested in doing it now. they have signed up his son-in-law. they signed up his business partner and it's not working: they nee

client —— security services as well if we were given a revoca ble services as well if we were given a revocablenation was being planned. so there was some aid the nation in certain quarters that we were all deceived and they expressed as to whether or not we can trust security services if another journalist whether or not we can trust security services if anotherjournalist is murdered and it's still a controversial issue than the attem pts controversial issue than the attempts that we witnessed last week. argentina has cancelled a world cup warm—up match with israel, after international pressure over israel's treatment of palestinians in gaza. here's the head of argentina's football association. it has led us to decide not to travel, my responsible is to look after the health and safety of the entire delegation and we made this decision. they want to apologise to the israeli community, if not against the jewish community. the israeli community, if not against thejewish community. on the contrary, i simply think that from now on i would like everyone to see this decision as a contribution to wor

we've sued him over the transgender military ban sd him over separating immigrant families and revocationf d daca, denying women in rights to have an abortion. sued him over sanctuary cities, over detaining a u.s. citizen as an enemy combatant without charges and time and time again we have prevailed in the court at least at the lower levels. [applause] now i have in my twitter feed, i think i'm up to episode 121 in our efforts to fight back against the trump administration over the courts. that is that with he can fight back againstomeone who is in some sense revolutionary by reinforcing the values and laws that this country stands for at its best, not by, you know, some sort of revolutionary means and i'll say one i think thut the see you in court. you know, there's been -- the sort of the change in the a.c.l.u. since trump hasee elected has been remarkable. as we know we went to 8 million members, we have all kind of celebrity, quest love and to do the deejaying for us, and all kinds of celebrities who want to support us, but i thought for me the moment i realized the a.c.l.u. had arri

we sued over revocation of daca.e suited over the nine young women in immigration custody their right to choose to have an abortion. we sued him over sanctuary cities. we had certain over detainee a u.s. citizen as an enemy combatant without charges. and time and time again we had prevailed in the court, at least at the lower levels. [applause] >> so i have on my twitter feed a kind of regular feature, we will see in court episode number, and think i'm up to episode number 121 of our efforts to fight back against the top administration using the courts. and i think that's a critical part of this notion of the rule of law. that is the we can fight back against someone who is in some sense revolutionary by reinforcing the values and laws that this country stands for at its best, not by some sort of revolutionary means. and i would just have one thing about the we will see you in court. there's been, the sort of change in the aclu since trump has been elected is remarkable as people know. we went from 400,000 members to

. >> former trump campaign manager paul manafort in custody as a judge revocation his $10 million bail orders him to jail. >> the fact that he went to jail when hillary clinton walks free. >> this is one the toughest courses in the world. ♪ raise your hand ♪ raise your hand ♪ pete: it's not just the small graphic that brings the song. i don't know if you missed that. ainsley: i know i watch next hour. pete: watch more closely, you are on the show. griff griff just six weeks ago we had a now we are raising our hands. abby: we are so proud of you. i was looking at the sun set because that's one of the great things about getting up the middle of the night we get to watch the sunrise and on beautiful days here in new york city there is no better sunrise than here. have you got to take it in. pete: what about the beach like on the beach some of those sunrises? no better. abby: look at that over the skyscrapers. griff: over the beach. happy international surfing day. surfers watching the sunrise. pete: real thing or did you make that up? griff: today. abby: and you are here on the couch. gri

are from a large company like amazon or facebook, or they are from small companies, and freely set revocable permissions, such that we can create new kinds of value by combining that data. i believe that an economy that has that kind of a free flow of information and security and control, that is based on the individual, would be a society that is far greater in innovation than the one we have currently today. >> can a facebook user right now view how they are targeted, with predictive analysis, can they see that? can i see how i am viewed, what cohort i am put in, can i change that? can i determine what cohort i want to be in? >> not exactly, no. you can, with a new tool that is now being announced, as i understand, but has not been rolled out, called the transparency and i'm looking at the expert to the left. that will be the case, partially, however, that control peace is very limited at this point. i do not think it should be, but it is. >> do you have anything to add to that mr. sultani? are you the expert that we are looking at? >> there are a set of rules, one is your interest manager

in his revocation -- remember the players were actually asking for a meeting with him.el bennett from the seahawks who is moving to the eagles who is a friend, i just want to read what he said because he said he would have gone to the white house. and the reason he would have gone is because he want ad dialogue with the president. he is willing to dialogue with the president. and the thing that he said that was so beautiful and i want to read it because the president also stereotypes folks like these players and dehumanizes them and what michael bennett says, we have to shed our fears on race, religion, sexuality and immigration. and that's what he wants to talk to the president about. this is a president who stokes those fears, stokes the stereotypes, reinforces them rather than draws us into a discussion. even when we have disagreement because that's fundamentally what democracy is about. >> jill, that aspect of it, which has so many people destabilized and afraid is here in one bucket, in the other is donald trump's essential assertion of absolute power. he is essent

there is no more revocable way of incapacitating a dangerous individual than through imposition of theenalty. ainsley: becoming a parent changes how you feels changes if this happened to my child. >> of course the horrific child we read about. ainsley: kish sharks for, against or why. >> against it for spiritual and constitutional reasons. i don't feel the human being has the right to take the right of another human being. a lot of people against abortion but for the death penalty. it's another thing taking af a lot. also find it's being applied unfairly and unjustly amongst different races, different classes. not everyone can afford a good attorney. and also from statis particulars that i have seen, it does not necessarily deter criminals from committing these heinous crimes. ainsley: why do you think that the statistics have changed? why do you think more americans now are in support of this, elliott? >> it tends to track with the crime rates. ticked um in recent years. when people read about 10,000 ms-13 gang members and connect it to ms-13. ainsley: mutilating teenagers. >> pretty