the revocation on the other one probably... you're probably correct on that. >> vice president fung: in the -- his original application then for the one that was revoked, did it have the same requirements? >> same requirements, yes. >> vice president fung: as this ordinance? >> yes. >> vice president fung: it just did not have the fingerprinting requirement, therefore there was no history check? >> there always was a fingerprinting requirement. i can show you that. actually i did show it to you but i'll show you again. there always was one. i don't know why there wasn't one on that one. and that's what it is there, basically the applicant shall be accompanied by a fingerprint fee, which they're charged typically. maybe he wasn't charged that at that time. he didn't have a set -- a complete set of applicant's fingerprints to be taken by the police department at that time. and that's for all the applicants that are tow drivers or owners. >> vice president fung: right. but in his previous application, was there any fingerprints in

>> good question. >> i think the fine is also dropped along with the revocation. are you looking for -- >> i don't believe we have jurisdiction. >> we have no jurisdiction over the fine. >> if there's no basis for revocation, i don't think that's a -- >> that's going to be an issue for the mta and the permittee. >> i think the mta will have to make that determination if the permit is not revoked. >> okay. so, on the basis that we stated earlier, i would move to grant the appeal and reverse the revocation. >> okay. >> so, could i just suggest that on that basis, there was insufficient evidence to support a revocation? >> that's correct. >> we have a motion then from the president to grant this appeal, overrule the revocation and thus reinstate the medallion. i believe the finding was that there was insufficient evidence to support the revocation. on that motion to overrule with that finding, the vice-president is absent, commissioner hurtado? >> aye. >> commissioner lazarus? >> aye. >> thank you, the vote is 3-0, the revocation is overruled, the medallion is reinst

what are you looking at, the actual revocation? >> the revocation to be denied he held a permit for bay bridge which was to be revoked. that's the way it should be. nelson's towing, he applied to work for nelson's he held a bay bridge towing. >> no, i didn't. >> that's what it says on this list here. >> okay. >> either or, one is revoked, one is denied. >> continuance. >> vice president fung: that's what i was leading to in my comment. i think what we need to see is the original letters that were appealed, whichever one was appealed, but we need to see the original letter of action on a revocation, and on a denial, and what the heading was on those. and then put it together with whatever occurred at the appeal of one of those decisions. by reading this letter here, it appears that only one of those actions was appealed. but i not sure which one. >> yeah. well it was for the most recent, the most recent from what i understand was he wanted to work for bay bridge. i can take a look -- >> vice president fung: i think we need to see wh

jarvis murray, this matter relates to the revocation of mr. kipnis' medallion, he had two opportunities to address his concerns regarding his driving requirement and as ms. mason stated, because mr. kipnis is a medallion permit holder, he is required to drive 108 hours or [inaudible] shifts each year. each year, we do an audit and that audit is conducted by scott leon, of every medallion's weigh bill, as part of that audit, mr. kipnis came under our attention because his weigh bills for the prior years were short, upon subsequent visits to gather up his material, he remained short which is where we began our revocation proceedings. as part of our code, we can for good cause revoke a medallion permit holder for not driving because part of the requirement is being a full time driver. we had a hearing in june of 2010 and at that hearing, the sfmta presented the weigh bills that we had from mr. kipnis, we had 31 weigh bills in 2007, 41 for 2008 and 43 for 2009 and for general reference, each shift is generally 10 hours so we assume for sake of arg

we are attempting to give them revocable permits that would allow them to start the work as quickly as possible. it does mean that we will be bringing back to you and to the board of supervisors permanent easements, but to be clear, we are giving memory vocable -- refocus it -- revocable permits that would be easier to say no to later. one of them would be the crystal springs golf course. they're trying to replace, in one case, 39 mi. of pipe. this is a big job and they're trying to do it as fast as possible. our intent in mind to be your and our objection would be to give them reach vocable permits the -- revocable permits. >> will there be easements granted? >> there will be easements, but in this case, they just tend to be over a little bit from where the pipes were. >> there just over a little bit from -- ? >> that is the norm. >> and it is natural gas? rex it is. -- >> is. >> my only concern is that in the course of doing this, that somebody does not create problems that did not already exist in terms of if it is in the watershed, either drainage or more exposure to reservoirs. >>

bus companies will be subject to a $,000 fine, license suspension or revocation if they do not comply. >> this build holds limousines and party buses accountable for underaged drinking. >> reporter: in his absence brett's parents know their son is helping save lives. >> that's the bittersweet part. we feel his presence everyday right now and he's gonna make a difference. >> reporter: in addition to the legislation the studebakers set up a collarship fund in emeryville in their son's name. sort -- two told celebration they say although bittersweet. the law goes into effect january 1st of next year. kira klapper, abc7 news. >>> in contra costa county traffic still moving slowly on aeeway reports of a body on southbound 680 treat boulevard in walnut creek forced chp to close two lanes the incident reported after 9 a.m. brought traffic to a standstill ing a commute back-up. the sheriff's department is investigating. >>> water main break in san francisco expected to be fixed in the next couple of hours. that pipe burst this morning. this is cell phone video of the mess it created. crews ar

bus companies will be subject to a $,000 fine, license suspension or revocation if they do not comply. >> this build holds limousines and party buses accountable for underaged drinking. >> reporter: in his absence brett's parents know their son is helping save lives. >> that's the bittersweet part. we feel his presence everyday right now and he's gonna make a difference. >> reporter: in addition to the legislation the studebakers set up a collarship fund in emeryville in their son's name. sort -- two told celebration they say although bittersweet. the law goes into effect january 1st of next year. kira klapper, abc7 news. >>> in contra costa county traffic still moving slowly on a busy freeway reports of a body on southbound 680 treat boulevard in walnut creek forced chp to close two lanes the incident reported after 9 a.m. brought traffic to a standstill ing a commute back-up. the sheriff's department is investigating. >>> water main break in san francisco expected to be fixed in the next couple of hours. that pipe burst this morning. this is cell phone video of the mess it created.

>> david pelle pal, and i'm just touching back on the pg&e gas pipeline on the revocable permit issue. this is the first and hearing about it. i appreciate the watershed mitigation protection. it seems that there would be all kinds of impacts and things. i do not know who has to reply with what ceqa requirements. that is an interesting point. i would hope that within the staff that the groups are involved and what ever we need to do and what ever reports need to be generated or monitored that it can be done to the commission in the future. i'm also wondering if pg&e will vacate their existing building if their new pipelines are being taken out of the old? and i'm assuming that they will cover all of the puc costs related to this relocation. >> mr. harrington? >> all of the different parts of the puc are involved with city planning, because city planning has to be happy with the final review on that. in many cases, i believe they want to have the old pipeline left in place. what you do when a pipeline is still underground there, we're working on reimbursement of costs. >> and if they a

. >> that could mean a suspension or revocation of a liquor license. the latest incident was september 1 when police say a 25 year-old fatally stabbed one of the bouncers who is trying to break up a large bite. county officials say for the past several years, there have been a copious amount of unfortunate issues at tb's including after parties in the parking lot which they say attributes to to much noise and laughter. >> the eni to consider whether they need to -- too much noise and litter. >> they need to consider -- >> hiring more security. they said the government is overreacting. the owner does a lot for the community, including hosting barbeques in the parking lot. no comment tonight from either of the management or the attorney. >> in national report showed that 67% of baltimore county's african american males finished high school last year. it is a report on public agitation among school systems with more than 10,000 african- american male system -- students. baltimore county students ranked fourth in the nation with 67% of african males receiv

, the existing medallions in circulation would be under this regime there are other medallions, revocations or new medallions the board could make a future decision on. i would concur with some strong sentiment i have heard from others that we should provide that certainty to the people on the list. >> i would support that sooner rather than later. if we can. with all due deliberations and also the driver's fund. is time we come up with something helpful to the drivers. i think that is something i would like to see in the near future. >> anybody else? >> when is the time line that we would be able to take up the waiting list issue? how long do we have? >> i was -- [unintelligible] >> we areÑifá looking at januar. i was suggesting and i heard from the chairman we do not need to wait for that point to have that discussion and for the board to establish policy that would free that certainty sooner. it is somewhat at the board pose a pleasure to bring it back any time after this meeting for discussion. >>Ñi hopefully and others woulde involved in helping. anything else, members of the board? le

unless the circumstances that lead to revocation had somehow changed.vice president fung: understood. commissioner lazarus: i am now somewhat confused. is there a gate there that is permissible? vice president fung: i believe based on the presentation made by both the building department and dpw was the main gate for emergency vehicle stays in place. it is the person gate that moves back so as it swings out it does not swing over the sidewalk. am i correct? >> inspector duffy is correct, there might be a possibility that if the date is moved back, additional work would have to be made in the public right away to provide the level landing and other accessible features. the department would issue a supplemental permit for reconstruction of the sidewalk as appropriate to make it happen in this case. president hwang: and that is at the cost and responsibility of the applicant? >> absolutely. vice president fung: we don't want to make the situation worse in terms of accessibility. president hwang: and the supplemental permit would be appealable? >> that woul

one of the reasons to do that is that would be revocable if the demand profile changes or some other factors change or depending on what kinds out in the public needs and necessity study we can make adjustments in the future. in order for these to be kind of viable economically, that they would need to be three-year permits, but at the end of those three years, we would be able to not renew them or do something different at that point in time. we are proposing to make them available to the color schemes, based on dispatch performance. basically looking at the ratio of service calls, radio calls that they take as opposed to just street hails as being a measure of how effectively they are meeting that radio service demand, when people pick up the phone and call or go through an app, to hail a taxi, which is one of the biggest challenges that we have outside of the airport and the downtown. it's very difficult for people to get them. we want these permits to incentivize those companies affiliating with dispatch services that service that lesser met need the best. so we would be proposin

one of occasions is i'm going to have for the region now let's just think about this film and the revocations of that. yeah this is this is a very similar to the episode of the danish cartoons about prophet mohammed what strikes me in it death is that people like duels need evil saudi shakes that every week the issue of to us moral as. the citing people to peel alawite sincere and drawls and message are all alawite already show now five to us to ok for less organized protests so guess this is this a creation of islam why they don't see absolutely anything about the key crucial issue for. arabs and muslims all over the roll which is the upper tide states in dallas the condition of the policy and the limb or say in this ng about that if you have occurred to me over stupid american movie made in california by. an institution cocked by the way he. has been israeli with the israeli donors hateful crude production we have does remain kitchens all longer than i grabbed the middle east and beyond the reach of central asia and afghanistan wake up the problem that's not the problem the problem is some

all of this he is ahead of a full revocation hearing. a proivation revocation hearing. fraud and talked to by probation officers and clearly a feeling in the federal courts that he violated that probation order and now this is the first step towards that full revocation hearing. we believe, wolf, that hears not occurred yesterday. something extraordinary the court is going through judge schneider's courtroom has been locked down in downtown l.a. no reporters allowed in and all reporters are watching it in anotherria television screen. trailer that s posted on youtube. miguel, thanks very much. >>> also news we're following, the u.s. is removingore staff from its embassy in triptripo, libya. this is a temporary further draw down for security reasons. oue sst will be reviewed early next week with the goal of restoring staff as soon as conditions allow. this all coming as pentagon officials and many are discussing still talking about investigating that attack on the consulate in benghazi, libya, that killed ama basder chris stevens and three others. >>> a dramatic warning

and so i think -- i guess my question is and i think there revocation process has significantly increased since that time as well all for the good and i guess my question would be, if you could flush out about how something like that happened how it hopefully would not happen in the future as you would think about again sort of the need to know, the need to share information on how cooperation is happening in a better way of with the various agencies in the department of state and cbp and the consular applications etc.. i'm not sure who i'm addressing this to. >> the inter-agency conducted a complete review following the events of 12-25 in 2000 took several significant steps following that event. one of our largest was the robust inter-agency process to revise the criteria for nomination to the watchlist to close the gaps, and we also have a 100% setting of all commercial airline passengers today to secure flight. cbp vets on a current basis. cbp's predeparture programs pushback spitting passengers before they board the plane. is an internationally for working with their international par

was the reason for the supposed revocation.now if it was financial, if it was medical, criminal, if it was for security clearance purposes. so, yes, her fears are for real. she does not know what her ex-husband may or may not do and she has very little recourse right now. >> kelly, i know you know that a lot of people watching will be very sympathetic to you. but they may also think do i really know the whole story here? is there something more? could she have done something that led to her children being taken away? the judge took pains to say both of you that are excellent parents, both of you. >> which is why it's more confusing to me. if i'm an excellent parent and i'm the mother and i've been the primary care giver of these children, i've given birth, nursed, raised these children, financially supported these children, i've never gotten child support, i've followed every court order, everything this judge has asked me to do. >> what had you proposed? >> what happened? >> would these children have been able to see your ex-h

. >> now, as i understand it, this is the first step toward any sort of revocation or change to his probation status. if his probation officer deems it necessary, there may be a hearing coming up before a judge. probably the judge that convicted him and sentenced him to that probation. serve a year in jail time as well, and that probation. and then after that hearing, we would find out whether his probation is revoked or whether or not it's changed in any way, but at this point, we don't have any word on that hearing. >> in terms of why this happened in the middle of the night, is it simply just because he wants to try and stay out of the spotlight now? >> well, i think this -- as he said, i think this was koord natd between federal officials, local officials, and he and his probation officer. there was a ton of media outside of his house. they were concerned about his safety. they are concerned about retribution. they wanted to do it in the lowest key way possible. and what you're looking at now in los angeles at midnight on a friday night, that's about as low-key as it gets. >> that is for

was the reason for the supposed revocation.now if it was financial, if it was medical, criminal, if it was for security clearance purposes. so, yes, her fears are for real. she does not know what her ex-husband may or may not do and she has very little recourse right now. >> kelly, i know you know that a lot of people watching will be very sympathetic to you. but they may also think do i really know the whole story here? is there something more? could she have done something that led to her children being taken away? the judge took pains to say both of you that are excellent parents, both of you. >> which is why it's more confusing to me. if i'm an excellent parent and i'm the mother and i've been the primary care giver of these children, i've given birth, nursed, raised these children, financially supported these children, i've never gotten child support, i've followed every court order, everything this judge has asked me to do. >> what had you proposed? >> what happened? >> would these children have been able to see your ex-h

dhs is constantly monitoring changes that could lead to recommendations in sporting or revocation ofisa, refusal of admission or in regards to an individual. we litigate risks that establishes measures to promote the safe movement of people and commerce and protecting civil rights and civil liberties. with this in mind, we are also delivered an efforts to provide travelers an opportunity to be heard. the inquiry program is a single point of contact for individuals, who have increased the experiences during travel. today, in response to 9/11, we have significantly adapted and enhance our ability to detect travel threats at the earliest opportunity. we do not work alone in this mission. terror screening is a multiagency and collaborative effort. more work remains to be done. i can assure you that the men and women of the department of homeland security never forget. our goal is to keep the country safe. for us it is not a job. it is a mission. thank you for this opportunity to update the committee on the progress we have made in recent years and thank you for holding this hearing. i ha

his amendment stops a revocation of a permit that after it's been issued and what the gentleman just referred to is a permit during the application process, the law allows the e.p.a. to veto a permit during the process. but after it's been approved this amendment takes care of not being able to revoke it years later. and keep in mind the revoked revocation that occurred was not because they were in violation of the permit. it was nothing but political theater. there was no violation of the permit. the state of west virginia and the e.p.a. stated that and the army corps of engineers stated there was no violation of the permit. this sets a bad dangerous precedent. i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from west virginia reserves. the gentleman from new jersey is recognized. mr. pallone: mr. speaker, you know, i want to point out that in addition to this being a terrible amendment, it's also an amendment that's going nowhere and it really frustrates me that on the last day of the session before the election this

people via the dem legs of their -- demolition of their homes and prevent ever construction and revocationnd denial of services especially with regard to schools, closing of institutions and impoverishment of jerusalem's community via a siege behind walls and checkpoints choking the city and preventing millions of palestinians from freely accessing its schools, churches, schools,

people via the dem legs of their -- demolition of their homes and prevent ever construction and revocationnd denial of services especially with regard to schools, closing of institutions and impoverishment of jerusalem's community via a siege behind walls and checkpoints choking the city and preventing millions of palestinians from freely accessing its schools, churches, schools, hospitals, and markets. the occupying power has also continued its construction and expansion of settlements in distant areas throughout the west bank and continued its suffocating blockade as well as brazen attacks against our people in the gaza strip who to this day continue to suffer from the dises is trous impact of the destructive --. jon: if you would like to hear more of mahmoud abbas's speech, the palestinian authority president is now speaking in front of the united nations. we'll have it streaming for you live on foxnews.com. that does it for us today. jenna: america live starts right now. megyn: fox news alert on a historic moment. we're minutes away from remarks that could set the stage for a new battl

the revocation of general orders number 11 by no means ended the controversy surrounding this issue ismocrats in congress to censure grand newspapers debating the issue. and retrospect, we know the jews were by no means the only bit them as human rights violation during the civil war. there were many, but jews were the only religious minority expelled as a class from a large war zone. anti-jewish prejudices during the civil war by the prominence of several jews, notably jefferson davis' right-hand man and cabinet secretary, judah p. benjamin in the ranks of the confederacy, benjamin way called him an israelite with egyptian principles. but the jewish confederates were by no means the only cause of prejudice, smuggling, speculating, price gouging, swindling shoddy merchandise for the military, all similarly laid at the doorstep of the jews. indeed, jews at the civil war seemed to personify wartime capitalism's ills. they were disproportionate legs were badly produced uniforms, inedible foodstuffs and other substandard merchandise that corrupts supply to the war effort and some marketed

colleague from west virginia and what is happening in the environmental protection agency, the revocation of permits. and i have been here not quite two years and i witnessed one of the most egregious things i have ever seen and maybe i will talk and give a few examples, which blew me away when i learned what happened. we had an operation in the state that mr. rahall represents went through 10 years of impact studies and in 2007, they were granted their permits. and they started the operation up, the mining operation and in 2010, when this administration came into power, they revoked the permits and they were arguing they didn't have the authority to revoke the permit three years later even though there was no cause. we had hearings in this on my committee. and the state of west virginia did not support those actions and army corps of engineers stated that there was no problems at the operation -- no permit violations. this is the first time in american history that i believe that a permit to be in business was revoked when there was no permit violations. this sets a very dangerous preced

his revocation of governor -- reputation of governor of new york, he starts out by busting trusts or the insurance industry. >> host: how well did thomas do we know earl warren before the 1948 election, and why was earl warren concerned? >> guest: the question is how well did earl warren know tom dewey? and i -- i think he liked them a lot. they had these governor conferences. they met them up so that they actually knew each other. and one of the dewey was a darn fool. just shut up and, oh, i don't like him. do we, however, look to this fellow, this progressive fellow, he is not like a reactionary like john brickner, who he does take in 1944. he is from california. he can bring both in. it was actually dewey in 1944, and duly turned them down. do he says -- one thinks that if he has any future in the party, that are not turned on again. maybe he was thinking of the supreme court, i'm not sure what he was thinking. but he takes it. they don't like each other. the campaigns don't match, and they don't meshed so much that either one or one swipe end up in a voting booth in november nove