decision is final if you deny the permit that's the final action on the permit it would be that revocationtfully no speedy process to make sure the decision is effected. >> thank you. >> make a motion. >> is there a motion? >> motion is not going to float their position is the same at commission make a motion? >> move to deny the rehearing request. >> on the basis that no new information has before appropriated thank you mr. pacheco. >> on that motion from commissioner fong to deny this rehearing request commissioner president lazarus commissioner vice president honda no arrest commissioner wilson thank you. the vote is 3 to one this rehearing is denied and the notice of decision shall be released. >> we're going to return to item 4 i know the requester is in the room to hear 926 garfield street this has been called ms. mar come up you have 3 minutes. >> hello the reason i asked for the rehearing because lilly was not here last time and we

suspension of revocation the building can revoke a permit under the provisions when the permit is issued in error or based on erroneous information supplied i believe there was maybe unknowingly misrepresentation on some of the permits from 2002, 2003 for the water damage repair because this is honestly whoever the permit applicant thought at that time in our packet there's a court document where the previous owner who had the property from 19 to 84 the state that he converted what was the rear yard storage or garnered shed to the residential used by putting in the toilet or kitchen whatever neatest to make that a residential use so again, i'm more than happy to facilitate any solution in the case thank you for your any questions >> i believe implicit commissioner walker has a comment but commissioner walker has a question for you. >> so the current owner purchased the property with that situation and the 3 r report in our records just the building permit indicated that was a residential unit. >> yes. >> the damage application to fix the damage so in our application for a permit is there

l, approve a 5 year revocable license to st. francis center of red wood city for an annual use fee of $125. >> thank you. i see that staff has requested that item 7f be removed. any other items on consent calendar to be removed? may i have a motion? >> so moved. >> excluding 7f all those in favor? opposed? the motion carries. next item, please. >> item 8, discussion and possible action to authorize the issuance of refunding water revenue bonds of up to $450 million to refinance all of the outstanding water enterprise revenue bonds series 2006a and portions of the series 2009 a and 2009b bonds and approve the form and authorizing the execution and delivery of related document bes, authorize the general manager to sell in one or more series of bonds on either a competitive or negotiated basis and delegate to the gm authorization to award each series of bonds to the highest bidder. >> good afternoon, commissioner charles perl, this item before you today is to request authorization to remupbd existing water revenue bonds to a lower

this permit we did not deny the permit that was essentially issued last night so today, i issued a revocation notice for the permit clearly it was issued in error and sanchez is before you as a discretionary review so there's a minor rear yard addition but the appeal of the decision the board had some serious concerns about the variance matter and there was some i think alignment about denying the variance application and continue to come to a resolution that will be on calendaring for march 18 the depended is offering did ability to meet with the parties we'll offer that the next hearing is march 18 a they'll not obeying be meeting until then that's all thank you. >> commissioners that places us in general public comment not to exceed exceed all matters listed under the consent agenda are considered by the board to be routine and will be enacted by one resolution in the form or forms listed below. if discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the consent agenda spaild i have no speaker cards. >> commissioners that places you under regular calendar the octavia project this is an in

. >> this revocation came only after a hard fought six-year court battle. >> health department. >> andour documentary investigation that revealed sunflower to be little more than a brothel, hiding behind the facade of a massage parlor. >> this is a house of prostitution. if you're just there for a massage, they don't want you there for a massage. they want the money for the extra service. >> year after year authorities, including the fbi, received reports of young foreign women being coerced into selling sex for cash at sunflower. >> there were so many signs of trafficking. living quarters found in the space. hole in the walls where women who were working as, so to speak, massage practitioners were hiding because they didn't have licenses. >> as we witnessed, sunflower's biggest achievement over the years was building secret hiding places to house women. >> we found a room that was downstairs. they had a lot of mattresses there where the women sleep. and it is a fire hazard. and there is very poor ventilation. i don't think any human being should be subject to that kind of treatment. >

first, we realized there are so many other benefits out weighing the one parking lot in the pro revocation i know way, do to the spice of a car how much you can achieve with that so there is that but also - we definitely look at the balance and but usually get this parking lot stalled bus the bedrooms are requesting them and paying for them it is a demand like a you know offer in the situation i also think that for parklets we do so a lot of benefits we're trying to start measuring for economic impact we have to eliminate data we have data showing there is an economic benefit to the business not the block or the area when a park let is installed. >> their investigated and the nature of spaces like i'm thinking of the inner richard and the sunlight they have severe parking problems so a lot of times i wanted to stop in to buy right but interests never a place to park so i'm not going to spend an hour looking for a parking space. >> we did a study we can give if you're interested looking at the geography distribution of the parklets we want to make parklets for neighborhood for more walkable

stations all the people need to look like the people they work with doesn't have to be absolute but revocations i'm sure you'll get our responses we'll continue to work with the community. >> will it be in writing. >> it will be in writing and you'll have it in writing we're on television. >> thank you, chief. >> thank you, chief >> on the note on the hiring please give you can't hire officers nails they apply so, please recommend people we've got to put them in the pipeline and get them to the academy the greater chance we have young men and particularly young african-americans on the force we're going to have to work to change attitudes about the police and recommend the staff you've got to get people into the pipeline or they've not be in the force. >> i called you investigator marshall commissioner marshall. >> i'll say that to respond to reverend brown i appreciate the time we got 11 folks and people asked a clear request for improvement not african-american community different training around racial profiling specifically highlighting what that department was unaware of and within 5 days

could case 679 six the appellant and owner of record the revocable trust the attorney for the appellant reuben, junius & rose action by appellant reverse the moratorium of the orders under the section of the san francisco building code. >> good morning john engine for the department the address for 411 marina building is a single-family dwelling and the slooegs solution for a kitchen on the ground floor director is here to meet 2013 which an order of abatement was issued no permits filed to deal with the abatement so the staff asks for the abatement order that concludes my report and is the appellant here? good morning, commissioners john with reuben, junius & rose here on behalf of the project sponsor since we were last here we asked joe duffey to come out and talk about life safety issue there were no one we're moving forward decided to maintain our request from the board for a 10 year moratorium on enforcement of the order of abatement due to financial hardship that is the property owners mother that lives in the basement she's 0 no longer able to live diligently and can't afford to

and refined and processes for the permit extensionss another in 2010 to expand the grounds for revocation and lastly in 2011 to create this new thing called the live performance permit the code the police code the sections 1060 and 70 are our bicycle those rules promulgate more in a specific way how the commission precedes in terms of hearings when someone comes in front of you to you know be suspended or revoked and so those steps you take are outlined in those rules and in 2007 maintains in 2015 they didn't so the clean version in front of you simply makes the changes so they reflect what the sections in the code say and i'm asking kindly that we approve those. >> thanks for putting that out and cleaning up up house. >> so commissioners are are there are clarifying questions it is pretty straightforward any comments on this. >> comments thanks for the work reading it was kind of i imagine you trying to write it. >> you can they can our st. >> i want to make a motion to approve those changes. >> moved and seconded is there public comment i was sometimes i forget that no public comment pu

event and recognize agriculture part of the giant parking lot called lot 337 timed i approved the revocable licenses we're here to talk about the project how it's been revised and rebrand, if you will since you last heard about it and specifically respond to questions you had at our last meeting about the financial books and the financing of the project itself i want to get both that with me well, the way it's going to work i'll give you a presentation and answer as many questions as i can and introduce bryan from the giant to also provide additional material will project how it's changed and the financing has evolved again to remind you last may we were able to work with you and in approval for this existing project that's the site for the 138 event you'll see pictures of shortly in freelancing oppression you approved the adjacent roadway 40 on the boulevard and park let it expand on game days and isolate that street for public access the goal has been to use the term place make no mistake about it this quiet corner of the waterfront for parking for the majority of the year an active spate

. >> if it's our position that the cf c was issued inappropriately then it maidens to do a revocation and ask the process start again. >> if the city is interested in working with the owner then it will work with the owner and suspended the circuit courts for example c and invite a process naive commissioner walker i think that has the same impact we don't have a cf c for reasons unclear we have a suspended permit that is quite unusual with a appeal by the same department it seems in the interest of consistency the department will want to take a consistent action with the cf c that's our view we think the cf c to be reinstated we urge you to do that we think my client was relying on the 3 r report we've made those arguments in our brouf brief. >> what about the argument we relied on information that was given to us under penalty of perjury on the application. >> that's not in front of you there's no evidence of that that was speculation by the inspector that's all you have. >> well, if it's a stated use not authorized on the application of the existing use then it's not - >> well. >>

the code gives us the jury instruction from our appeals of the revocation and allows to you affirm or modify or reverse it decision and if you precede adopt that avenue make the finding for the basis of your conclusion. >> okay. i've been keeping quiet i've been shift in the debate first of all i want to be clear the chief raernd came out this morning and said he whishes he didn't have this case sfarnd but i want to be clear i don't i don't think the department skews the roughness i think i want to commend the chief for doing what he to lay out the history to get to the conversation all the departments and commissioners have done a go back as a victim of badge 3 r reports i've done this over the years it happens i wish i had representatives to correct because my team told me i self-have a leg to stand on with that said, i know that commissioner walker said that particularly i have one 3 r report i had to concede it that i want to kind of come to a point of view obviously i was hoping we won't have jurisdiction and this would go to the board of appeals some of the commissioners believe

in san francisco why is there not equal dollars 345u78 to deal with the issue so we can have a revocation rather than sometimes arguments say there recent a relationship you keep us sick to ask for another grant but not solve the problem in this bucket i don't see the breakdown by neighborhood on the particular topics only a subject if i have a disapportionment of tusks of toxics in hunters point i don't see the same volume of toefkz as in bayview saying sadly i hope as a advocate we convince the mayor jointly we're funding the air in terms of the unfunded mandate it a ridiculous only a politicians verbiage not when the where the rubber meets the road with we need the dollars for the implementation and changes right now from the air district agrees it is the greatest hazard to human health the heartache rate is the highest of all neighborhood directly co-related with pollutant same as asthma we did our studies in 48 one score i won't mention 55 percent of the babies in first grade were asthmatic i am talking about engaging the students in other research 80 percent of the babies are asthma

first, we realized there are so many other benefits out weighing the one parking lot in the pro revocation i know way, do to the spice of a car how much you can achieve with that so there is that but also - we definitely look at the balance and but usually get this parking lot stalled bus

stations all the people need to look like the people they work with doesn't have to be absolute but revocations i'm sure you'll get our responses we'll continue to work with the community. >> will it be in writing. >> it will be in writing and you'll have it in writing we're on television. >> thank you, chief. >> thank you, chie

could case 679 six the appellant and owner of record the revocable trust the attorney

because what society tells the kid is that you are dead because you arer revocably ruined. --er revocably ruined, that you have been spoiled that you have been destroyed, that your manhood has been taken. and that is, that is not real, and it is not true. it has a lot of very negative connotations in it. what is true is that there has been a betrayal of trust there has been an exploitation of a power differential there has been an invasion of your zone of intimacy and sovereignty of your most intimate self. those things you can recover from. the suffocation of society that tells you that you are forever broken and beyond repair is much hard orer to recover from -- harder to recover from. and i know we're running out of time, so i'm just going to read this one last piece which is about learning to love yourself and having the courage to confess to yourself and to the world that you are strong and resilient and deserving of the life. concealment makes the soul a swamp. confession is how you drain it. daring to step into one's self is the bravest, strangest most natural, most

all of a sudden the euro becomes revocable. market participants will look to other countries saying where else could this happen. that moves that bank run to probably italy, possibly to spain. i don't know if that's going to happen, but you need to watch this. if everything goes to the middle, everything goes to germany and the euro zone fractures. look for a significantly lower euro. if you see the euro diving, that's going to be your first sign there's a real problem out there. number two, look at german yields, if they start to go recorder low because they're all right at record lows,s th s tht problem. if you can't get your money out of the lit italy, spain, greeceu buy gold. i bought some gld today. i'll short more of the euro. >> with more on what the future could hold for greece, let's bring in the dennis garvin. you think that greece should leave? do you think that greece will leave, though? >> first of all, if i were cyprus, i would leave, i would absolutely throw down the gauntlet. i would walk away and say you're tro

for me, i was aware of a very young age of vietnam i had an appreciation of that war the revocation ofrelevance of that war. what was really exciting about telling that story was when i started to uncover these personal stories. >> the part that strikes me is the american officials who refused to get it. who didn't understand that there were so many south vietnamese who were vulnerable and needed to get out. >> i think that's right. i think it's telling this larger story because as a nation when we think about vietnam we think about promises made, promises broken. i think it's you know we abandoned our allies. it is not a bright, shining moment in our nation's history. yet despite this wave of history going in the wrong direction these men stood up and did the right thing. >> for some of those people are the feelings still raw? >> extraordinarily so, absolutely. for most of the people i interviewed i would talk to them you know days later and they would say they were still recovering from talking about it. >> talk about this comparison you make between what's going on today and what went on in

in a lot of difficulty down the road, as soon as you prove that membership of the euro is not a revocablethat to you 25 minutes ago. >> and? >> mark agrees. >> hans -- mark makes an important point, the adoption of the common currency is informed in large part by europe's experience in the 20th century. something that was lost on many people who have not studied or did not pay attention during that part of history class. you are an american living in europe. explain to a predominately american audience what we are talking about. >> for the older generation of germans, the germans had fought in the war, they are perhaps the most committed to the euro project. you her angela merkel talking about pan-european, pro-european views as much as the greeks and french. how can you make the core of europe's stronger, and how can you really make the eu a binding and workable project? there is a view inside of merkel's party that europe as a whole would be strengthened if you excise greece. that was not the predominant view 2 or 3 years ago. there's a few that to make europe stronger you can lose grac

noncitizens -- to provide temporary reprieve from removal and temporary permission to work, both of them revocable large, specifically defined -- defined categories of undocumented immigrants, and that is not unprecedented at all. >> the chair will recognize the gentleman from arizona, mr. franks. >> it's often said that when human rights and human laws are in human hands, that men lose their freedom. professor foley, i sometimes am entertained by reading from the federalist papers two law professors like yourself. i'm not an attorney, so it just gives me a little thrill, you understand. in madison bust a minute federalist number seven, he stated that the accumulation of all powers, legislative executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether one, few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elected, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. framers of the constitution understood the accumulations of powers and tierney were inseparable. they rejected giving the newly created chief executive the legal authority to dispense with the enforcement of the laws. that of cou

in some ways render themselves irrelevant for various reasons using languages fall of jargon or revocation or not asking questions that were relevant to the public, and in some ways fostered a disconnect with the public that is unnecessary and is also unfortunate. he did not say this was true of all intellectuals, but he did argue that public intellectuals are in some ways a dying breed. others responded critically. there are many interesting voices out there and gave many examples in the rebuttal, including members of this panel, just to say that that tradition is alive and well. the point of today's panel is not so much to have a debate about whether he was right a wrong, nor is it to have a debate which is familiar at almost every aha or oah conference for sure about the role of the public intellectual or should historians even be trying to do this. i think most of us and the panel start the assumption. it is a good thing for a lot of us who want to do it, and it has a lot of value. rather than what i wanted to do when i put this together is bring people together who are doing interesti

notifying applicants of the revocation of their admissions office. carnegie mellon apologized for the error. unbelievable. you can't do that. maybe they ought to use snail mail. >>> hbo tonight john oliver has been renewed for two more seasons, 35 episodes apiece. they put to ends rumors that he might replace jon stewart on the ""daly" show." jessica williams removed herself as a possible candidate via twitter saying i'm not hosting, thank you, but i am extremely under-qualified for the job. speaking of extremely under-qualified for like asking for forgiveness, we have one. >> we do. the new york post now, alex rodriguez issues a five paragraph handwritten letter to fans yesterday apologizing for his mistakes over the last couple of years. he wrote, quote, i take full responsibility for the mistakes that led to my suspension for the 2014 season. i regret that my actions made the situation worse than it needed to be. he added, quote, it was gracious of the yankees to offer me the use of yankee stadium for this apology but i decided the next time i am