that the revocation of protection for dreamers brought here as children will not be carried out. there was no paraphernalia at the call addition, if we do x, y, z. a, b, c, d, w. there was no paraphernalia at the call phrase. we will not put you at risk, young woman. nd those similarly situated. and we have a bipartisan coalition on this floor but the leader speaks about going into a room. if you want to have a pejorative, a book room. privately. and try to resolve issues unrelated -- excuse me. not directly related to the daca protect is. they're here, the president said they ought to stay here and the president made a representation, mr. speaker, that if we passed a bill he would sign it. but as the senate considered a compromise piece of legislation agreed to by republican senators and democratic senators, just a few hours before it was brought to the floor, the president said he would veto it. that was not what he said on television in the white house. that he would take the heat. if he -- if heat there is. and sign the bill. that we sent them. now we have a speaker of the ho

independent focusing on some of the remark, one thatjumped out for me was this unprecedentedly crude revocationy is responding as well. the rhetoric is ramping up on this story, david. i believe there were about 60 russian diplomats in london,

independent focusing on some of the remark, one thatjumped out for me was this unprecedentedly crude revocation that is being described at, in terms of the way theresa may is responding as well. theresa may is responding as well. the rhetoric is ramping up on this story, david. i believe there were about 60 russian diplomats in london, about 60 fish diplomats in moscow. 23 diplomats are going to be expeuedin moscow. 23 diplomats are going to be expelled in the coming week from the uk, i think we can expect to see 2a oi’ uk, i think we can expect to see 2a or 25 maybe... there is a b drawn up. all the covering, it coverage this morning reflecting on the fact that these are undeclared intelligence. if the office knew they were undeclared why were they not thrown out? but i think that shows what we are built up to understand, that there is spying that takes place in the uk, there is spying that takes place in russia. and governments have tolerated it until this moment. and governments have tolerated it untilthis moment. it and governments have tolerated it until this moment. it begs the question,

at this time i filed a complaint, and the permit was revoced due to nonlicensed engineer approved plans and unlicensed excavation. revised detail report was submitted, again, no mention of windows. the bedroom and bathroom windows in the original plan were removed and three new windows were planned to be installed for the compensation of lack of the light well. window 9-m is a bathroom window. 44 by 36, directly across and approximately 7 feet from the large eat in kitchen window of 1421 ulloa. the owners at this time said they're willing to reduce the size from 44 inches by 36 inches to 44 to 24. the difference in elevation, it would be level with my kitchen table. he also stated the window will be frosted, but there will not stob the light -- [ inaudible [ inaudible ] these houses, 1427, 1421, 1427, 1k3 1435 ulloa were constructed in 1927 with a similar design. the light well on the east side ensure privacy, and the quality of life without noise, order, and the bathroom light going on and off. i have some pictures of -- this is 1421, the bay windows. this is 1427, and they're removing

it was brought to their attention and then they discovered the mistake and they asked us for the revocation of the issued permit. >> was the place in production at this stage? >> yes. >> how many months was it in production? >> probably not very long because i think that there was a food facility right adjacent to where they were doing this work and they weren't too happy about the dust and the stuff that was being spewed in the air there and the impact on their operation, obviously. >> when the original application for the -- was that just done through a letter of intent or a letter of determination? or was there notification to the community or the neighborhood on the original approval? >> on the permit application? >> on the original application to allow -- to -- was there -- >> i don't think that there was any original -- based on what they were doing. >> was it written -- was it written in a letter of determination to the -- to the applicant -- >> i believe that this was done all over-the-counter. >> wow. >> when you say "done over-the-counter" they just went in and said, here is my zo

of dea registration by just obtaining the certificate of the medical license revocation? >> we can do an order to show cause. >> no investigation is needed? >> that is correct because they've lost state authority. >> after a state revocation of a doctor's medical license, how quickly is dea notified about the revocation and how long does it take for the dea to revoke the doctor's -- >> we need to work with the state medical boards to learn of that information, our field officers are responsible for that. >> are the vast majority of enforcement actions comprised of these no state authority cases that do not involve dea investigation? >> in terms of the orders to show cause? >> that is correct. >> that is correct. >> yes? >> yes. >> is it estimated to be about 80% of their actions? >> i would believe that's probably a fair number. >> mr. chair, i'd like to yield the balance of my time to you, mr. griffith. >> thank you very much. when i was asking you questions earlier, we talked about the isos and the apparent requirement. i know you didn't do it, but the apparent requirem

have to stop me there will running out of time certainly a very complex case very wide diplomatic revocations as well a lot of questions that are answered to evidence to be considered both sides here john pilger australian journalist documentary filmmaker thanks so much for coming to give your take today on what's quickly deepening diplomatic scandal. well we're going to a short break now our special coverage of russia's presidential election will be coming up in just a few moments you stay with us for. the good and the bad you need capitalism to work both winners and losers you can't bail out every single bank that gets into trouble you can't bail out every. nice free money you got to let the system weed out the losers otherwise you end up with you know a state controlled state maintained price fixing regime by the state that resembles all failed such experiments in the past why not just let the free market be the free market. for. human rights abuses notion. of yemen. genocide who are gone just who is some poor doing who american them british and a number of european countries are very gene

that the revocation of protection for dreamers brought here as children will not be carried out. there was no paraphernalia at the call addition, if we do x, y, z. a, b, c, d, w. there was no paraphernalia at the call phrase. we will not put you at risk, young woman. nd those similarly situated. and we have a bipartisan coalition on this floor but the leader speaks about going into a room. if you want to have a pejorative, a book room. privately. and try to resolve issues unrelated -- excuse me. not directly related to the daca protect is. they're here, the president said they ought to stay here and the president made a representation, mr. speaker, that if we passed a bill he would sign it. but as the senate considered a compromise piece of legislation agreed to by republican senators and democratic senators, just a few hours before it was brought to the floor, the president said he would veto it. that was not what he said on television in the white house. that he would take the heat. if he -- if heat there is. and sign the bill. that we sent them. now we have a speaker of the ho

very insightful and helped in our minds in the realm of and are the ramifications what are the revocation set are unknown. the daughter of a small business owner, my dad went to school in michigan. this really hits home for me. it hits home for my family and all the businesses that my dad works with. i think that putting that in the perspective of small to medium-sized businesses, the largest employers are the movers and shakers when it comes to growing the economy and creating jobs. but as i think i could listen to you speak all day long. if you want to come teach a class at gm you -- >> i've always wanted to come teach a class so maybe. >> you should. i'm going to start things off with one technical question. you mention exclusion process and some of the exemption america when it comes to not available and reasonable quantity, not made here. one thing i noticed was missing is price. there is no indication of if this is going to increase the price of your goodbyes 50 or 60%. yesterday percent if it is going to increase the price of your goods -- if this is going to increase the price of

if there are complaints, they can come back and ask to have the conditional use permit revoced, but i don't think that's going to happen. >> and i don't think that's going to happen. >> okay. >> clerk: commissioners, there is a motion to approve the permit with amended conditions. on that motion -- [ roll call. ] >> clerk: so moved, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 5-0. item 20 has been continued, so that places us under your discretionary review calendar commissioners for case number 21. [agenda item read]. >> commissioner moore: there's nobody here. >> good evening, commissioners. david lindsey, department staff. on february 8, 2018, the commission considered the request for discretionary review submitted by jack long for the project at 2514 balboa street. the project proposed a horizontal addition at the rear and a two story vertical addition positive the existing two story single-family house with the addition of a second dwelling unit. [ inaudible ] >> -- the potential disruption of sewage lines and ventilation of adjacent properties. following the hearing, the commi

where license revocation is not necessary we have aggressively pursued civil actions and ensuring compliance. over the last decade dea's levied fines totaling nearly three and a $90 million against opioid distributors nationwide and entered into mou's with each. dea has reprioritized a portion of the criminal investigators and diverse investigators and enforcement groups referred to as tactical diversion squads. .. he just completed training 13000 pharmacist, pharmacy technicians and they only fill valid prescriptions. in may, dea will initiate similar nationwide effort to provide training on the vital role that prescribers play in curbing this epidemic. this effort will start with specific focus on the stage where we've seen little decrease or, in some instances, an increase in opioid prescribing rates. administrative action, so bicycle cases are all important steps where we have fallen short in the past it is by not proactively leveraging the data that has been available to us. i'm happy to discuss what happened in the past i focus my time on moving our agency forward and appreciate the op

seeing recurrent issues of noncompliant, which we don't expect, but if we were to see that, it's a revocable permit. if they're not addressing the citations, not just not paying them, but addressing them with the drivers, we have the ability to revoke the permit and stop them from operating in the city. we haven't had that. we don't expect that to happen. i think we've had good dialogue and i think it's in their business, and anyone else seeking a permit, it's in their business interest to cooperate so they can continue to operate. but this permit program creates the leverage we have to ensure the accountability you're talking about. >> yes? >> director borden: can i ask a question related to that. are pcos able to enforce or cite these kinds of -- whether it's the ptv or the commuter shuttles, are they able to do that or is ate separate group? >> i want to let's be careful here and ask the city attorney, i don't want to segue into talking about the commuter shuttle program, since this is the ptv program and if we talk about the shuttle program without giving the public an opportunity to wei

supported leave because they believe in the application of british law and british sovereignty, entity revocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation. you cannot call yourself someone who believes in british law and win by breaking british law in order to achieve that goal. >> and you believe the law was broken? mr. wylie: absolutely. i am so angry that two people that i introduced in good faith -- it is hard for a lot of young people to get involved in politics. i introduced these two young people on the campaign to stephen parkinson in good faith that they wouldn't be manipulated, and they wouldn't be used to break the law. what is so egregious about this is darren was made to be personally liable for a criminal conspiracy, in my view. it is absolutely outrageous the amount of emotional trauma darren has been put through, watching his mental health deteriorate. don convinced him to leave university. >> he said, what might going to do? everyone hates me. he said, i feel trapped. irrespective of what you think about darren, he was a young person manipulate