to sit down. >> is a book about that. >> it wasn't three days in reykjavik.an matter, mike pompeo laid out a dozen things they want the iranians to do. it is a big, tall order. can this administration squeeze the europeans to come around other side? >> there's two answers to that question. the european governments are not going to just fall in line and say we are with you on this, but on the ground this is already happening. we had a story a few days ago saying european companies are already pulling back. they are starting to fall back on investments already made and they are not making new investments because they know that they can be sanctioned by the u.s. and they don't want to get caught between doing business with the u.s. and doing business with iran. i don't think it's likely the european governments say we agree with you let's ditch this deal, that's not going to happen. but on the ground there is already kind of a freeze in european, iranian business happening. >> bill: we will wait 90 or 180 days depending on the schedule. let's get a break here. w

i know in the case of reykjavik, post-reykjavik, it was understanding where this whole spacing wouldon the table. it would be out there. what do you think this president's are? >> i think the beauty of the letter the president wrote is, he gives kim the opportunity to respond and come back to the table. kim also was not the individual making the bellicose statements. there were people working for him. neil: that's right. >> so he was probably calculating on his side as well, so, hopefully kim will, will seize the opportunity to move forward. they have been all like, maybe more like poker games than house closings where -- neil: far bet analogy. it is interesting i noticed that too, the president's letter was carefully crafted he didn't like the language out of the north korean regime, he went on to be complimentary as you can get about the north korean leader. ronald reagan even after walking away from reykjavik after that consistently praised gorbachev as a man of peace and one who clearly wanted a better than soviet union than his predecessors. >> right. neil: so he left that open

>> in reykjavik, they got up and left. geneva, reykjavik, and washington, d.c., in moscow.son this one is important in moscow is it's the final one, and he speaks to moscow state university students about freedom and democracy, not hitting them over the head that we are better than you but but t of like a pied piper. come and see what the west is like. >> juan: i was covering the reagan white house. he makes tremendous inroads with gorbachev but now we are dealing with putin. putin has rejected the west and all of our offers and help in terms of coming of the western world in capitalism. >> totally different. he is trying to recreate the soviet union expansionism. mikael gorbachev was a different leader, and reagan saw that and that's why he negotiated with him. reagan and gorbachev in red square when they are walking around. marlin fitzwater whispers in his ear and says all these people around you, they are not civilians. they are kgb officers. one of them was believed to be vladimir putin. >> jesse: i am not reading this. [laughter] >> juan: it is better than "the new yor

on it going to start his bungalow in a suburb of the icelandic capital reykjavik is a modern concrete looking villa with a previous life. like almost all the houses here it was built in the one nine hundred sixty s. . anna and her husband have modernized the bungalow and renovated it in keeping with its surroundings. a enjoyed to stay here and all the lights and the nature to be in contact with the natives here it's very much a balance between inside and outside summery you feel very. good connection and relaxed. the idea for the conversion came about in twenty fifteen at first are not only wanted to redesign the kitchen and dining room. but that led to a total conversion. now the response of room for ana and her husband and their daughter who often visits. the first one we started really to break things down it's like a journey you don't know where to where you're going because you never thought it there was so much. that turned out to be have to say that because it was always more and more and more. but it was also fun to do it. hardly anything remains of the old house this special

occupation that are not that is the that is their denied basic rights i mean the god that's left reykjavik they asked for it she was against the occupation we're here because we oppose transcendence in this we think it's playing with the lives of israelis and palestinians alike in our lives and if it is not a game. the. was. was. meant to be anybody parliamentarian what do you what do you thing. about the whole incident we are. in a demonstration which has been licensed by there's been a police but immediately after we arrived they attacked us attacked a member of the knesset just because we had it been through the past and then forgot and then they attacked us and pushed us to the back we are here to see that jerusalem east is ok if i did it today it could be the capital of the state of palestine the tensions are definitely running high here as you can see these scuffles and clashes and we're being pushed forward and. a lot of anger. on what happened let up in fact right out the heart of the firefight up to me don't doubt it but they're sure it is pretty well i don't know what it. was all

people expect a reykjavÍk moment, the president could go and they could extend talking into the secondtalk about big things and they could walk out of the deal and get nothing, but that is okay because with maximum pressure, we dealt with the security threat and if kim is willing to come to the table now he will come back. if they wake away with something credible and if they walk away with nothing it proves what we said, we are not on a path to war, there will be another day, don't sell your stocks. todd: can't blame me for trying to get a prediction. we have two less wildcards at the end of the day. we will see what happens. hopefully the good guys make it out on top. thanks for getting up with us friday morning. it is 17 minutes after the hour. isis winning the social media war but democrats are worried about russia related ads on facebook as congress has its priorities out of whack. kurt the cyber guy with how the site could and should be racing extremists. >> too plotting dangerous for us. >> based on the premise from 2015. >> there are no reports that iran has violated the agreem

. >> you have geneva in 1985, r e reykjavik in '86 and washington and moscow in '88.when he was the president of the screen actors guild in hollywood fighting communism there always talked aggressively about communism and how it would not work, and he believed eventually in speeches as president they would be on the ash heap of history and the soviet union was the evil empire. >> evil empire. >> it would be aggressive the things he said. nancy reagan even said hey listen, dial it back a little bit. but that enabled him, when mikhail gorbachev came to the front, to say, this is a guy i can work with. >> you go back to those radio speeches he used to give, this is the thing he thought about. his entire adult life, even before he thought about running for president, the relationship between capitalism and communism, freedom and oppression. this was in his bones so he could make those decisions, briefing books are important but comake those decisions on the fly with gorbachev. >> that's what secretary of state george schultz said was so amazing about reagan, his inherent

. >> reykjavik was gorbachev and ronald reagan.eports you know, suggesting that you know he understands that rest of the world has gone past north korea. he does have a opportunity to bring his nation forward. what that requires from us continues to be the big question. what do they accept for denikoladenews-- denuclearize. >> i think that letter we were talking about that president trump sent to the leader of north korea showed that meeting is not the goal. the goal is to have complete verified, and irreversible denuclearization of the north korea peninsula unless administration thinks that those goals are achieve able it does not make sense to is a meeting. even in this situation they have gone back, they retraded on joint military exercises with south korea. which were routine. they went back on, they did not show up on meeting to prepare logistics for the summit. of and they destroyed nuclear site, they did not invite nuclear experts. it remains to be seen. >> president trump keeps articulating that over and over for these peop

decision-making .eetings one of the best things that you wrote was about reagan coming back on the plane from reykjavik , having left gorbachev and sort of getting inside what was going on on air force one, what people were talking about. with president trump there is no mystery about what he is thinking or saying, he says it all the time. does anyone here think they don't know what he's thinking at any given moment? just log onto your computer. turn on the cable news. that has presented a lot of challenges. with the white house getting out of its own way to get something done. what isnk that striking, again, this is probably my more traditional view with three national security adviser's and two chiefs of staff, it's probably with abandon, the top strategist getting fired and leaving, it is sort of unusual, but sometimes the white house can have a real shakedown in the first year or two, but i'm not a fan of trump and maybe you can make the case , empirically, the chaos it doesn't matter that much. then he makes the right decisions to mobilize the public through twitter after fox news and through diff

they weren't even born when we saw what ronald reagan did at reykjavik. yet, we conservatives believe reagan's tough negotiations against mikhail gorbach gorbachev, and yet you negotiated. you negotiate and take a tough line for a long time and then you get concessions. here's donald trump bumbling in, he wasn't even a good dealmaker in new york city. that's why he was $9 billion in debt, right? he bumbles in, like we've always accused liberals of bumbling in in negotiations with communists and tiyrannical regimes. and this sort of bumbling is what we're fearful of, we're always skeptical, especially of communist regimes. and yet donald trump bumbles in. this is not a surprise to us real conservatives. i know nikki haley is going to have to say what she has to say at the united nations. but this is not surprising to nikki haley. she comes out of the tradition of ronald reagan as do i and so many other people that are not surprised by this at all. >> right. and i think what trump thinks, just to try to filter through his mind to the extent that's ever poss

that was in reykjavik, iceland. that was a famous time when he was negotiating a missile agreement with mikhail gorbachev. they discovered something in the paperwork at the last second that he didn't like. that is a suspend so-called "star wars" defense initiative plan. reagan said it, saw it, to hell with it, i'm out of here. they regrouped months later and did strike a deal. a former reagan economic advisor. more the look back at that history, david, more it start tells me how startling that was, because it caught every one, including many in the american delegation by surprise. what lessons can we learn from that? >> well, the lessons is, this is a long-term process. i remember the view coming from the foreign policy establishment and the left was that reagan's administration was over. that american children were facing a future, nightmarish future of nuclear holocaust. there was even suspicion that the, assassination attempt against the president, his injuries had caught up with him. that he had completely lost

. >> he's playing this like ronald reagan played reykjavik and i think his achievement will be as great or greater. when it's all finished, let's hope. ♪ from geico to esurance saved an average of $412. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance, an allstate company. click or call. paying too much for insurance that isn't the right fit? well, esurance makes finding the right coverage easy. in fact, drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved an average of $412. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance, an allstate company. click or call. if yor crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough, it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious.

. >> sean:ay just like reykjavik. >> just like a wreck a bike. the really stark.know my personalities are different. i don't know if reagan would like twitter. he did say those bold things that changed the paradigm. maybe the paradigm -- >> sean: they said that reagan was a california cowboy, that he would start world war iii, reaganomics would result in the collapse of the economy. 21 million new jobs were created. we doubled revenues to the federal government at head of the longest. mack of p's economic growth and history. do you see the similarities? i'm no i'm dragging into opinion but do you see similarities? >> i do. the last word of this book -- >> sean: i didn't get to that page yet. >> if you look at the words of big speeches of president trump, the speech in warsaw, poland, the speech in riyadh, the united nationsti speech, the ste of the union speech, they have phrases and terminology that you could actually hear reagan deliver. now i'm not saying that president trump is president reagan. >> sean: very different personalities. >> but they have similar m

>> there is a page out of the reagan playbook, he didn't reykjavÍk in 1986, they got to a point whereand when gorbachev said we will make it happen but only if you illuminate your sdi program, reagan said that is it, i have had enough, he saw the trap being late for the united states and stepped away from the table and walked out of rhetoric -- reykjavÍk, a very determined guy. stuart: this time around the leading characters are different. kim jung un is radically different from gorbachev and donald trump is radically different from ronald reagan. a very different situation. it is hard to say the playbook must be the same. >> different situation, something donald trump is going to have to take into account, the new secretary of state, mike pompeo reported kim jung un might be a dictator we laugh at, he apparently is a crafty, smart guy, i think he will be prepared to get his own way and donald trump has to be on his best game. stuart: thanks for joining us, appreciate it. back to the school shooting in texas, kr iv, fox affiliate in houston, reporting eight dead. police say one shoote

." >> well reagan had principles and i was at reykjavik.und him who could advise him. there's no process here. >> and reagan and the people around reagan understood that he could walk away from reykjavik and chances were good that gorbachev would go back to his generals and say "maybe sdi works, maybe it doesn't, but we don't have the money to make that chance." >> if you're looking at the walking away from rag eykjavik the walking away from the north korean deal, the difference is just like you are saying, there's a point you're trying to follow. it's not clear to me and i don't think it's clear from susan's reporting that the president has a plan for north korea so when confronted with these other variables that come into play, his reaction is i don't want to fail, i don't want to get blamed for anything, i don't want to be held accountable so i am stepping back. i want to be the guy that breaks the deal first. >> you know what donald trump's plan is? >> what's that? >> that's it. >> headline. that's what donald trump thinks about everyda

it's not easy but they have to -- this is like reagan going to reykjavik and meeting gorbachev.ig deal >> ambassador, one thing investors we talked to are trying to figure out is, where does china fit into all of this? does it have leverage as a power broker with north korea when it comes to the brewing trade fight between the u.s. and china, or does it take a back seat >> china is key to the north korea issue. there's no question about that and china and i think they just made a statement yesterday is supportive of comprehensive denuclearization of the korean peninsula. so china is on board with certainly the united states and our allies in japan and south korea. and it's in chinese interest to see a negotiated peaceful settlement to the korean issue i think the issue of trade with the united states is a separate issue. i don't think china would be using that as leverage with the united states. i think the memoriance of resolving issues on the korean peninsula is immense with china. instability in north korea is not in china's interest and certainly conflict on the korean penin

. >> you mention the reykjavÍk example. say what you will attend.difference between he and kim jong un. the administration has been talking to kim jong un and now his number two, kim yong chol. they're both murderers, both liars. they had both been caught lying and murdering. that's a very different guys with him to exact concessions. >> two points or three here. at a certain point, you have to negotiate with bad guys if you're going to get a good outcome. >> we can't pick and choose our leaders. >> we can't. >> imagine what's happening right now. pompeii was with the former head of our intelligence community and kim yong chol is that of the north korean intelligence community. imagine if you and i know which other secrets and were sitting out trying to get the brass tacks and troops. we would get there a lot faster than if we were doing it at a lower level. at the end of the day china has to play to this and i have to say we think some evolution in the right direction is the right way to go. my estimation and what might come out of this has gone fr

. >> is whose overriding philosophy was it's better to talk to people and you mentioned reykjavÍk. walk away. it was a bad deal. donald at the time, white house chief, white house chief of staff asked will there be another summit and he said another summit, never. look what happened. neil: i believe what prompted the walkout was they showed the papers that the agreement in ronald reagan's face. i saw the papers and everything else where he had to agree the defense initiatives instead will. >> his phrases i want it restricted. he said he wanted it restricted to billboard tory. i just can't do that. reagan even offered in that meeting to share it with the soviets. we were on our way back to washington. neil: but they ultimately did get a deal. i wonder if they are taking a moment to lower expectations. that was startling back then. to set the stage for what could be disappointment. not even going to the summit. >> maybe. clearly there's some things going on behind the scene. if they are talking to each other, they're not shooting at each other and maybe they could begin to establish

neil: he walked away from reykjavik.n there. >> the bottom line, they pretty much come to the conclusion on both sides dearming but at the end of the day the russians threw this out, he said no, i'm not going to do that. i feel too strongly about it. neil: this guy literally -- something this president would do in north korea. i didn't realize the degree. that's it. >> thank you very much. two or three years we got a better deal. it took three years. he knew what he wanted. was core belief. it was not question of making a deal but making the right deal for us. neil: ed rollins, thank you for taking the time my friend, former reagan campaign manager. both sides like him. makes me very suspicious. >> makes me very suspicious. neil: right. if these markets are worried about the iran deal that was torn up they have a funny way of showing it. oil is a big reason for that. energy is big reason for that. confidence, that you know this will not lead to hyperinflation, very big reason for that. i will explain it all, with 29 of t

at the reykjavik summit, soviet leader mikael gorbachev was in fact serious about eliminating nuclear weapons. and that conversation helped end what long had been an intractable arms race between two nuclear powers. it seems reasonable to us now, but at the time, most were incredulous. so while the challenge to a lasting agreement with north korea are great, we should not abandon optimism. nevertheless, a fundamental question is whether this time will be different from our previous efforts with the kim regime. is kim jong-un different from his father, different from his grandfather, or is he using the same playbook? have our sanctions compelled a weakened north korea to the table, or, with a completed icbm, is kim jong-un negotiating from a position of strength? the more fundamental question is more within our control to address -- what have we learned from the past, and what must we do differently this time to ensure success? so, if you will permit me, i would like to share my thoughts about the roadmap that lies ahead. it is essential that we view this as the beginning of what will

who do so again when he walked away from a pretty big nuclear deal at reykjavik. the soviets essentially offered to give up much of their strategic arsenal but they wanted strategic defense initiative, missile defense for us to forgo you're ability to defend our own people from ballistic missiles. willing to walk away, toughness. people at the kennedy school or center for council on foreign relations their view of negotiation is sort of to make preemptive capitulations go, nice, nice. this tougher posture that is what kim jong-un will understand and helps with north korea. neil: you know there is a very dramatic display at the reagan library what you spoke of, chris, that was a quick add-on president was unaware, soviets saying you, the united states will stop this whole space initiative thing. reagan had no idea, that was the understanding, had no idea. well, that's it. good-bye. he really was walking away until they said, no, no. so we'll see what happens here. thank you very, very much. >> thanks. great to be here. neil: christian whiteon. we have a lot more co

one of many new eco—hotels drawing people away from the hugely popular sites around the capital, reykjavikforfuture generations. lucy hockings, bbc news, iceland. there are a number of events happening today to mark the first anniversary since the manchester arena bombing. a service starts at 2.00, with a national minute of silence at 2.30. at 10.31 tonight, bells will ring out across the city marking the moment the bomb went off a year ago today. we will have full coverage of those events on bbc news. the headlines are coming up on the bbc news channel. in a moment, we say goodbye to viewers on bbc two. first, we leave you with for a look at the weather. sun is shining across manchester at the moment, as it is across many parts of england and wales. this is the scene at devon at the moment, a bit of cloud in the sky, but further north and east, we have got some more cloud. some rather misty and murky conditions across some of these north sea coast areas. in scotland, quite a bit of cloud this afternoon, some cloud for northern ireland, but drier and brighter than yesterday. temperatures w

i remember reagan after reykjavik and people saying this old wimpering fool had given away our last bestce for peace. many still will not admit that that's exactly when gorbachev knew they had lost the cold war. time and time again reagan was a warmonger, time and time again reagan was going to get us into world war iii and then, of course, at the end ronald reagan helped bring down the wall, something he's still for some reason people still give far more credit to gorbachev than he deserves and reagan was the peace maker in the end. is there a slight possibility that we are all misjudging donald trump and actually it's his use of force, his threats, his thuggish behavior that may bring these tyrannical regimes to the table? >> no. >> okay, thank you, peggy noonan. >> i don't think we're misjudging this. look, i understand what you're saying, joe, i think both presidents, mr. reagan and mr. trump, had different things they were demonstrating. in mr. reagan's case, he had a serious, declared political philosophy which he had been talking about for 20 years. the thing he did when he became

category as all the naysayers when reagan was trying to work out deals, and when he walked away from reykjavikle like, that think like schumer were just, oh, it is the end of the world. its the worst thing. not realizing that what reagan did in turning around, walking away saying no, we're not going to give up on something that important ended upbringing down the soviet union, making america stronger tan it ever had been. that is until bill clinton and obama got through with us. stuart: okay, look, the summit is off. >> yeah. stuart: we don't know any response yet from north korea. >> oh, listen, let me tell you, it won't be off permanently because north korea's going to find out now what i didn't realize trump was serious b there will be a price that north korea will pay and donald trump will lead us in getting that price for them and then it will be the north korean leader that will come back begging to have some kind of talk. stuart: what do you think the next step is? >> i think it is immediately taking steps to -- well, just like trump is talking about with iran, putting the toughest sanc