proposed ordinance would significantly amend article 10 and 11 and remove the language and for rezic dagss, re-- designations and appeals and economic hardship and fee waivers, community input for historic district preservations

proposed ordinance would significantly amend article 10 and 11 and remove the language and for rezic dagss, re-- designations and appeals and economic hardship and fee waivers, community input for historic district preservations and the secretary of the interior standards. i can address each of the topics positive and provide a summary of the changes proposed by the h.p.c. and/or by supervisor weiner and highlighted the differences on the slides in yellow and where the the department has made a recommendation in green but to date the planning commission has not diskuzed in details the proposed changes to article 10. and there is a difference in the way the h.p.c. and the planning commission typically reviews legislation. and i just want toing a knowledge that the h.p.c. has gone through line by line each ordinance, article 10 and 11. today my presentation is summary but it is a fairly detailed summary and you may wish to discuss each topic individually or you may want to cut me short. i want you to encourage me if this gets too detailed at any point. the first topic is designation and this