. >> how about about that organic vegan gluten free rest rft. >> can't we go to the food truck. >> doou want to walk or take a taxi. >> there is an alert right here telling us there is heavy traffic in soma. >> let's walk there and then take a taxi or muni back. >> that new website gives us a lot of options. >> it sure does and we can use it again next weekend when we go to see the giants. there is a new destination section on the website that shows us how to get to at&t park. >> there is a section, and account alerts and information on parking and all kinds of stuff, it is so easy to use that even you can use it. >> that is smart. >> are you giving me a compliment. >> i think that i am. >> wow, thanks. >> now you can buy dinner. sfmta.com. access useful information, any . >> welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors for wednesday, april 23, 2014. my name is mark farrell, i will be chairing this committee. i am joined by supervisor avalos. i want to thank the clerk of the committee miss linda wong as well as members of sfgtv covering this meeting. >> please silence all cell ph

and secondly, it was reforms rft program. it was the president himself that acknowledged publicly that the unemployment insurance program needed reforms. there were abuses of the program, it wasn't reaching the people -- all the people it was intended to reach, it had some flaws, it needed to be fixed. yet once again all those attempts not only by me but by a number of my colleagues in order to provide what have been deemed i think even on a bipartisan basis as reasonable reforms, they've been rejected, rejected not because we had a vote, debate, and it didn't achieve the requisite number of votes for passage, but rejected because the majority leader simply used procedures once again to deny the minority any opportunity -- of course, that includes the majority also -- any opportunity to stand on this floor, offer up an amendment and debate that amendment, have it voted on, accept the result and then move forward. so the two that i had mentioned, the two reforms which i thought made eminent sense, i didn't find much opposition

and secondly, it was reforms rft program. it was the president himself that acknowledged publicly that the unemployment insurance program needed reforms. there were abuses of the program, it wasn't reaching the people -- all the people it was intended to reach, it had some flaws, it needed to be fixed. yet once again all those attempts not only by me but by a number of my colleagues in order to provide what have been deemed i think even on a bipartisan basis as reasonable reforms, they've been rejected, rejected not because we had a vote, debate, and it didn't achieve the requisite number of votes for passage, but rejected because the majority leader simply used procedures once again to deny the minority any opportunity -- of course, that includes the majority also -- any opportunity to stand on this floor, offer up an amendment and debate that amendment, have it voted on, accept the result and then move forward. so the two that i had mentioned, the two reforms which i thought made eminent sense, i didn't find much opposition