richard curtis spoke to my colleague annita mcveigh earlier.. one of the things is that actually, it was in the original rules of this amazing building never to have a tree planted at a time there's so much symbolism i can't tell you. amazing building never to have a tree planted at a time when man thought we can conquer nature and exploited and in fact, this is a sort of explosion of disobedience that we are planting an entire forest that if we don't take care of nature, nature won't take care of us. and also, it's kind of a forest of doubt because all of us are wondering what we can do and allows to make things better and you move through the forest and come to these amazing pillars which represent each of the sustainable development goals because they are a to—do list for the planet. it's a complicated but beautiful symbol of how all of us can actually get stuff done to fight climate change and all the other problems that we have in the world. is that the idea, to get everyone who comes and say this to say that they should take ownership of

partnership with project everyone, a not—for—profit agency co—founded by the writer and director richard curtise with the trees behind you. it does look really lovely, so, explain a bit more, yf forrest, what is the symbolism here?— is the symbolism here? there's so much symbolism, _ is the symbolism here? there's so much symbolism, i _ is the symbolism here? there's so much symbolism, i can't _ is the symbolism here? there's so much symbolism, i can't tell- is the symbolism here? there's so much symbolism, i can't tell you. | much symbolism, i can�*t tell you. one of the things is that actually it was in the original rules of this amazing building never to have a tree planted, at a time when man thought we could conquer nature and exploit it. and in fact, so, this is an explosion of disobedience, that we have planted an entire forest here, to show that if we don�*t take care of nature, nature won�*t take care of nature, nature won�*t take care of nature, nature won�*t take care of us. then, also, it is kind of a forest of doubt, like all of us i wondering what we can do in our life to make thi

about it is the co—founder of comic relief, writer and director and co—founder of this project, richard curtis. what was your inspiration behind this? — stuff. what was your inspiration behind this? is _ stuff. what was your inspiration behind this? is quite _ stuff. what was your inspiration behind this? is quite unusual. i stuff. what was your inspiration i behind this? is quite unusual. the insiration behind this? is quite unusual. tie: inspiration was wickedness in that when this building was built they said no trees because man was trying to conquer nature but now we have realised, don't actually listen to nature, that we all depend on, as it were, the trees, the sun and wanted to make a difference to the world, so we thought we would build a forest to let nature, as it were, take its proper place. it forest to let nature, as it were, take its proper place.— forest to let nature, as it were, take its proper place. it all looks spectacular _ take its proper place. it all looks spectacular but _ take its proper place. it all looks spectacular but at _ take its proper place. it all looks spe

that a gentleman named curtis wright, who is the chief examiner at fda, about a year after he left the fda, went to work for purdue pharma at three times his government salary. richard sackler was personally involved in conversations about when and how curtis wright should come and work at the company, having approved the drug. when curtis wright was at the agency, perdue sent some of its executives to camp out in a motel in maryland and work closely with him, helping him write his reviews of their studies of the drug. so it's essentially like you go and you help the teacher grade your paper. they were working that closely, really hand in glove. there was a line in the original package insert for the drug that said, oxycontin has this particular continuous release system which is believed to reduce the abuse liability of the drug. a great marketing line because it says it's potentially safer than other drugs that might be out there on the market. to this day, nobody can say who wrote that line. the company has said, oh, it was curtis wright and the fda. the fda says, oh, it was the company. that to me is the level of closeness, hand in glove cooperation between the

richard sackler was involved in conversations about when and how curtis wright should come and work athe company having approved the drug. when curtis wright was at the agency, produce sent some of its executives to camp out in a motel in maryland and work closely with him, helping him write his reviews of their studies of the drug. so it's like you go and help the teacher grade your paper. they were working that closely, hand in glove. there was a line in the original hand insert for the packaging that set oxycontin has this particular continuous release system, which is believed to release the abuse viability of the drug. a great marketing line. it says it's safer than other drugs that might be on the market. to this day, nobody can say who wrote the line. the fda says it was the company, that is a level of closeness of handing glove cooperation between the regulatory agency and the company that is dismaying and dangerous for u.s. consumers. >> my time has expired, i recognize a general lady from north carolina. you are now recognized. >> thank you, madame chairwoman. my questions ar