people like richard dawkins would say that's not a paradox she have no choice. we are simply the result of a lot of molecules bouncing around. she couldn't defy side not to fire. this two events are linked. that is the other point of view. i call a different conclusion. if they find it. and if it was possible to do this that they don't had free will the idea that free will is testable experimentally is not testable but provable. it's never been said in print. it shows there is a relationship when we are thinking about time and you think about free well. i go to the end of the book. you don't have to read the end if you don't like that kind of stuff. it is in there. is there anything physical or chemical. or something extra. i talk a lot about that. there's many things that are a physical and a chemical i will give you an example the fact that it is irrational. it could never had been discovered from physics and chemistry from any of the experimental sciences. it exists independent of the physical world. there's lots of other examples as well. i talk about how i

and most physicists, people like richard dawkins would say that's not a paradox.fires she had no choice. we are simply the result of lots of little molecules bouncing around. we may have the illusion of free will but she couldn't decide not to fire. those two events are linked. which happened first hardly matters. i go to a different conclusion. if someone finds a tachyon then i will admit that my understanding of free will is wrong, that mary doesn't have free will and we are Ãthe idea that free will is testable experimentally, not testable but disapproval. let's that is fascinating to me. i have said that my class many times. i've never said imprints. it shows there is a relationship when you're thinking about time and your thing about free will the two are linked to each other. so i delved in the end of the book after establish all the physics, you don't have to be the end if you like that kind of stuff. but it is in the air. >> the part of you that has free will something a physical or a chemical and something extra? >> that's what i think. yes. i talked a lot

this physicist, people like richard dawkins, would say that's not a paradox. john dies, she fires, she had no choice. we are simply the result of lots of little molecules bouncing around. we may have the illusion of free will but she couldn't decide not to fire. those two events are linked. which happened first hardly matters. that's dawkins pointed, about atheists. okay? i draw a different conclusion. if someone finds a tachyon and approves possible to do this then i will admit that my understanding of free will is wrong, that mary doesn't have free will, and we have thrown free will -- i think free will is testable, it's falsifiable. that's fastened to me. that's never been said anywhere in print. i have said that in my class many times. it's never been set in print. it shows there is a relationship when we're thinking about time and thinking about free will, that you are late to each other. i delve into the book after you establish all of physics. you have to read it and if you don't like that kind of stuff but it is in their. spirit is there a part of you

imagine a spectrum, richard dawkins over here, over here somebody in the new testament, the old testament the manifestations they developed historically. einstein was against atheism. he thought it was unscientific to have that view. how can you be so sure? over here he didn't follow the details. he thought moses was a very wise man but didn't the ten commandments were given by god. there is a big ground in between and einstein's views were like his favorite philosopher, spinoza. you can think of it as pantheism. patterns in the universe are significant. we don't understand what they are. we are like a little child looking at a complex thing but the complex thing is there and it is waiting. einstein felt he was in tradition, plato, spinoza, he had been able to apply his decent mind in mathematics. he was not an a plus student. i might not be smarter than the that i have the persistence of a mule. he would work on his stuff and he felt that is what he had done and it turns out scientists had taken a wrong turn. they were going off about probability and quantum mechanics and eventually woul

the is a an interesting okay in oklahoma where richard dawkin spoke. the tried to pass a measure saying that evolution is unpop already theory. the university of tennessee tried to get rid of funding after a university of tess tennessee had section -- sex people on campus. >> let's keep in indo-i deep lited that gill is here because i've read your work. the -- something i actually take a little bit of -- not pride but happiness in is the fact that when david horowitz went to the state lug legislature tuesday trying to pass laws saying we have to have ideology balance. we dent walt the state legislatures man man dating that. the didn't get anywhere which is a good thing. >> we have a bunch of questions i knock get to all the ones online, but several are fallingg into two categories. the first is a number of conservative either faculty members, young faculty member odd students worry beside coming out on the campus. they're looking for at individual, what to do, what not too toe do the other -- several questions are flasher gifted they're allowing someti

there was an interesting case in oklahoma where richard dawkins spoke at the university of oklahoma, they tried to pass a measure that evolution is an untested and unpopular theory -- [laughter] >> unpopular. >> yeah. >> they're right about that. >> university of tennessee tried to get rid of funding after university of tennessee had sex week on campus. so they're generally sort of social conservative sort of culture war issues, but they're nowhere near, in my experience, the amount of influence as the federal government wields. >> and let's keep in mind. first of all, i'm delighted that you're here, because i've read your work many times over. something that i actually take a little bit of not pride, but just happiness in is the fact that, you know, when david horowitz went to state legislatures and tried to get them to pass laws saying we have to have ideological ballots -- which would have been a disaster, and i say that as somebody who wants more ideological ballots, we don't want the state legislatures mandating that -- he didn't get anywhere. which is a good thing. >> another q