richard. >> my name is fong. i wanted to tell you that i attended the water project, recycling water project. mr. buell you asked about information that would be handed out. i have copies of the n.o.p., out. i have copies of the n.o.p., notice of the project. i wanted to address the commission on what is mitigateable at the project. i think i'm going to stand up and say i'm in frafere of the project. there were a few things that i looked at that were -- are very important, the park that -- if we're going to take 2.8 -- if the project is going to develop 2.8 million gallons of water on a daily basis -- why isn't it you can't get more out of there? that's what i'm thinking because wee in san francisco county, we're in the business of running water and we have other water, this particular water is more costly than the hechey water. when we produce more water, such as through other methods, that are priorityized through the pilot study they have with the saline project, will we be able to -- to get some money back wi

ernestine weis and richard fong and muir row. milo. after that. if you could please come up, anyone's name that i called, please come forward. >> good afternoon commissioners. my name is jill fox with the indiana basin association. 17 years advocating for our neighborhood. i'm an original neighborhood parks councilmember. the district 10 rep to prozac for six years in the beginning and served on the blue greenway task force. i understand from the prozac agenda that rec and park is ready to use the open space fund to acquire property. this is wonderful news. since it has been a number of yous -- years since we required anything, there's an acquisition policy that was designed by prozac and our p.d. staff and approved by the commission. i want to tell you about the historic boatyard which our organization has been advocating for since 1999. it was on the acquisition list in the past but was not presented to prosack in the round. this property fits the criteriaperson perfectly and has strong self-sustaining reuse potential. it is generally nope as 90