. >>> commissioners, i'm richard harris, the san francisco public park alliance. we have 6,000 members. i'm also a san francisco resident and have been a golfer in sharp park for most of my life. we support funding for the completion of the e-i-r which is what is good for you on agenda number 9 of the sun ramp. this is 18-year process. you hear the controversy here. there were two or three hearings here by the planning commission on the e-i-r. there was the extra hearing. i don't know how many thousands of comments there were, but there are a lot of comments which has engendered the meeting. to spend more money to finish the e-i-r. some of the comments you've had today go to the ultimate merits. there will be time for discussing that. right now the issue is to finish the funding of the e-i-r. we support that. we are opposed to dropping sharp park out of that. sharp park has been part of it for 18 years. there is a reference by a young woman earlier in the comment period, she thought there had been a promise that sharp park would be separated from the e-i-r. that's

go ahead i agree with everything yeah good everything richard said until he got to the final analysis and you know i should state today that harry reid in the senate is talking about even ending the filibuster just as republicans are refusing to allow dodd frank to be implemented part of the problem with these reforms is they're not allowed to be implemented you've got a supreme court that allows corporations to buy our political system so we've definitely had regression in the last few years i don't deny that at all but there are certain things we still have in the thirty's we still are still security we still have medicare from the sixty's yes the republicans are trying to abolish it but they haven't succeeded as of yet so we do have some remnants and i do think reform can work i guess my question back to richard is are you saying that we should have referenda on whether exxon should purchase an oil plant we should have referenda on whether apple should build a new i phone surely you're not saying that people go to vote on every corporation's business are you richard go ahead. no i'm not saying that i'm saying that we can be j

reply go ahead i agree with every yeah good everything richard said until he got to the final analysis and you know i should state today that harry reid in the senate is talking about even ending the filibuster just as republicans are refusing to allow dodd frank to be implemented part of the problem with these reforms is they're not allowed to be implemented you've got a supreme court that allows corporations to buy our political system so we've definitely had regression in the last few years i don't deny that at all but there are certain things we still have in the thirty's we still are still security we still have medicare from the sixty's yes the republicans are trying to abolish it but they haven't succeeded as of yet so we do have some remnants and i do think reform can work i guess my question back to richard is are you saying that we should have referenda on whether exxon should purchase an oil plant we should have referenda on whether apple should build a new i phone surely you're not saying that people go to vote on every corporation's business are you richard go ahead. no i'm not saying that i'm saying that we can be j

the commercial success of these works led by richard dawkins, christopher hitchens, god is not great, alex rosenberg, the atheist guide to reality, sam harris, the moral landscape and, of course, bill morris lethal dose, the movie, is a phenomenon as the book world likes to say but in any case it is clear that the stores these writers have to tell is one that are very powerful part of our culture once told and emphatically so. more recently a separate series of extraordinarily successful books, lectures and articles have appeared concerning the events that of scientific knowledge about the human brain, that works and how possesses the mystifying capacities that until now we have called consciousness and creativity. i will be focusing on three science writers, besides journalists jonah lehrer and the neuroscientists antonio. these writers are i think the typical representative of the fields but their work is just a sliver of the total outlay. each winner of scientists and their allies among the advocates of artificial intelligence, the literature explaining the brain's wiring is vast and technically intimidating. unlike those scientists and

when after 20 years after fdr and harry truman, they ran the general who received the nazi surrender and they won. in 1956, they stuck to the middle then with richardthe right said it was their turn and blew the roof off the cow palace, mocking republican moderates. then getting killed with barry goldwater running against lyndon johnson. the democrats ran moderates in 60, 64, 68, then went wild in 72 the democrats got killed. the party bases get pushed aside for several elections and finally build up steam. the opponents in the iraq war, i believe the republican base will do the same in 2016, they put up with george bush, put up with bob dole, were deeply disappointed by george w. and last year mitt romney. they're going to come loaded for bear for the race for 2016. i predict the hard right is going to take over the republican party in 2016. and the nomination is going to rand paul. you watch. that's hardball for now. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. >>> good evening from washington, d.c., i'm ezra klein in for the terrific chris hayes, tonight on all in, the cold war may be over, but it doesn't feel like it's all that over. it's gettin

harry truman, they wanted back in the white house. they ran the general who received a nazi surrendo and won. then with richard nixon.ight said it was its turn and blew the roof off in san francisco mocking republican moderates and liberals like rockefeller. then getting killed with barry goldwater running against lyndon johnson. then went wild in '72 and ran george mcgovern. that's the year the democrats got killed. so then the pendulum goes. the party base gets pushed aside and then build up like steam and come roaring to the surface. obama won in 2008 over hillary clinton because the opponents of the iraq war had had it with the party leaders who played it safe and backed the war. i believe the republican base will do the same in 2016. they put up with george bush the first. and now are going to come loaded for bear with the rate for 2016. so i predict the hard right is going to take over the republican party in 2016 and the nomination is going to rand paul. you watch. this is what i do for a living. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for

when after 20 years after fdr and harry truman, they ran the general who received the nazi surrender and they won. in 1956, they stuck to the middle then with richardt said it was their turn and blew the roof off the cow palace, mocking republican moderates. then getting killed with barry goldwater running against linynn johns johnson. the democrats ran moderates in 60, 64, 68, then went wild in 72 the democrats got killed. the party bases get pushed aside for several elections and finally build up steam. the opponents in the iraq war, i believe the republican base will do the same in 2016, they put up with george bush, put up with bob dole, were deeply disappointed by george w. and last year mitt romney. they're going to come loaded for

richard perry. who is amazing -- >> music producer. >> jimmy: he produced one of my favorite albums of all-time. >> i know what it's going to be. "nilsson schmilsson." >> jimmy: "nilsson schmillson." harryput the water in the coconut. >> jimmy: and drink it all up. ♪ put the lime in the coconut you drink 'em all up ♪ ♪ you put the lime in the coconut >> jimmy: yeah. i love, "early in the morning." "the moon beam song" is my wedding song. >> really? >> jimmy: that's how much i love this record. it's the best album ever. >> great. they're writing a book about him now. about harry. yeah. >> jimmy: did you ever meet harry? >> no, i never did. he passed before -- he was a hard liver. and they did a good documentary. "who was harry nilsson and why is everybody talking about him?" >> jimmy: yeah! >> you ever seen it? it's really good. >> jimmy: it is, it's fantastic. great interviews from that. i'm just obsessed with the guy. >> but another person who is significant, given where we are, is tiny tim. richard perry discovered tiny tim. >> jimmy: really? >> oh, yeah. tiny tim was really a big talent. i know he got married here, right? >> jimmy: i don't know if you guys know this, studio 6b. so th