richard jeffrey joining us.ve you a quick heads up on how we think european equity markets are going to open. london looks like it will open around .5%. vodafone and national grid are two companies you want to watch out for today. later on this morning, i will be speaking with the ceo of vodafone. we will play that interview for you a little bit later on. lots to talk to him about. viewll get a brexit brexit from him as well. have a great day. trading is about to start in european equities. see you tomorrow. ♪ jonathan: good morning and a warm welcome to on the move. i am manus cranny come in for jonathan ferro. moments to go before the start of european trading. looks like we might get a reprieve in the markets. how long? headlines. the world's second-largest wireless carrier beats estimates . raises its outlook. china adds to the global deflation threat. fresh evidence of a slowdown emerges as inflation continues to decline. no mission is impossible. my minister david cameron prepares to unveil his four points

. >> i just want to say jeffrey rosen is correct that richard work. has done fantastic i wanted to ask about a justice by the name of william rehnquist who, at his confirmation in 1971, the issue came up that he in thetten a dissent brown case when it came before said,r and court and he he wanted -- he did not really feel that way. i just wondered if either of your guests have checked to see the professor be of justin rehnquist's comments. it very well at it was an important controversy. then memo was quite vivid. is that the fact southerners don't like black people and will never admit them and the truth is, i believe that pressey versus ferguson -- plessy versus ferguson was good lot. had asked him to express his own thoughts because jackson was undecided. 's secretaryson disputed rehnquist's accountant said that he had never asked for competing opinions to be written in his voice and according to her, rehnquist was expressing his own views. that is the most direct evidence. >> maurice is in memphis. >> good evening. the 14th amendment does not appl

. >> caller: i want to say jeffrey rosen is correct. richard kruger does fantastic work. this southern boy only heard one side of the argument for most of my childhood and even into college. i wanted to ask about a law clerk or justice jackson by the name of william rehnquist who hat his confirmation hearing in 1971, the issue came up that he had, in fact, written a dissent for justice jackson in the brown case when it came before the warren court and he said in '71 that they were just covering their bets, so to speak. he did not really feel that way. have you checked to see the veracity of justice rehnquist's comments at his confirmation some 20 years later. >> you summarize it very well. it was an important controversy. the memo was quite vivid where they said basically the fact is southerns don't like black people and are not going to admit them. i believe plessy versus ferguson was good law. chief justice rehnquist claimed he had been writing in jackson's voice. now all we know is that justice jackson's secretary disputed rehnquist's account and said jackson never ask

. >> i just want to say jeffrey rosen is correct that richard kroger isichard and is anwork epiphany for this southern boys would only heard one part of the argument. i wanted to ask about a justice -- a law clerk of justice jackson by the name of william rehnquist who, at his confirmation in 1971, the issue came up that he had written a dissent for justice jackson in the brown case when it came before the war and -- for the court, and he said that they were just covering their bets and he did not really feel that way. i just wondered if either of your guests have checked to see the veracity of justice rehnquist's comments. jeffrey: you summarize it very well. it was an important controversy. then memo was quite vivid. he said basically that the fact , is that southerners don't like black people and will never admit them and the truth is, i believe that plessy versus was good law. jackson had asked him to express his own thoughts because jackson was undecided. all we know is that justice jackson's secretary disputed rehnquist's account said that he had never asked for competing opini