and he said, number 39, richard m. nixont of the united states. >> what if this trail leads into the oval office at the white house? >> well, as i replied then, the trail should be followed wherever it leads. you take a lot of trips to the islands, phil? pretty great, right? oh phil's legally dead. fell off a boat. going by denis now. celery. long story. what do we got here. oh. not going to want to see this. i don't think this is going to work. just ok is not ok. at&t has america's best network, now with our best plans, at our best prices, starting at $35 a line for 4 lines. new from at&t. so bob, what do you take for back pain? before i take anything, i apply topical pain relievers first. salonpas lidocaine patch blocks pain receptors for effective, non-addictive relief. salonpas lidocaine. patch, roll-on or cream. hisamitsu. ♪ i see your face looking into mine ♪ ♪ and when you make me smile meet acqua panna with it's unique journey through the nature of tuscany. ♪ i feel much better acqua panna. meet the smoothest taste o

in refusing to produce these papers richard m nixon substituting his judgment as to what material was necessary for the inquiry interpose the powers of the presidency against the lawful subpoena of the house of representatives thereby assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to be exercise of the sole power of impeachment invested by the constitution and house of representatives. with all of this richard m nixon acted in a manner contrary to president and constitutional government with great prejudice. with the cause of law and justice and injury to the people of the united states. president nixon's case helped support the conclusion that presidential defiance the house impeachment inquiry constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors. i was thinking about the founders rereading the constitution and the notes in the constitutional convention. it was just a little over 230 years ago they met in philadelphia not too far from here and have been at it for a long time. they did not know if the constitution they were trying to write would sustain freedom but they tried to create a d

in refusing to produce these papers richard m nixon substituting his judgment as to what material was necessary for the inquiry interpose the powers of the presidency against the lawful subpoena of the house of representatives thereby assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to be exercise of the sole power of impeachment invested by the constitution and house of representatives. with all of this richard m nixon acted in a manner contrary to president and constitutional government with great prejudice. with the cause of law and justice and injury to the people of the united states. president nixon's case helped support the conclusion that presidential defiance the house impeachment inquiry constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors. i was thinking about the founders rereading the constitution and the notes in the constitutional convention. it was just a little over 230 years ago they met in philadelphia not too far from here and have been at it for a long time. they did not know if the constitution they were trying to write would sustain freedom but they tried to create a d

in all of this, richard m. nixonn a manner contrary, to his trust as president, sub virsive constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the united states. president nixon's case powerfully supports the conclusion that presidential defiance of the house impeachment inquiry constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors. you know, i've been thinking a lot about the founders. i've been rereading the constitution and the notes from the constitutional convention. it was just a little over 230 years ago that they met in philadelphia not too far from here. they had been at it for a long time. they didn't know whether the constitution they were trying to write would sustain freedom, but they were trying to create a completely different type of government. on july 20th, governor morris said this. the manlis trait is not the king. the people are the king. george mason of virginia on that same day said, shall any man be above justice? above all, that ma

in all of this, richard m. nixoncted in a matter contrary to his trust as president, subversive constitutional government to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest injury of the people of the united states. president nixon's case powerfully supports the conclusion that presidential defiance of a house impeachment inquiry constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors. i've been thinking about the constitution and the notes from the constitutional convention. it was just a little over 230 years ago that they met in philadelphia, not too far from here. they've been at it for a long time. they didn't know whether or not the constitution they were trying to write would sustain freedom, but they were trying to create a completely different type of government. on july 20th, governor moore said this. the magistrate is not the king. the people are the king. george mason of virginia, on that same day, said -- shall any man be above justice? above all, that man may by above it who can commit the mos

closest came is richard m. nixon and fortunately the republican party flipped on him, rightly so. is there's plenty of circumstantial evidence to already implicate all these people. right? barr, william barr himself was somehow directly involved in the decision around the whistleblower complaint blocked from congress. we know he flew around the world to dig up dirt. in his own investigation. he denigrated the government accounting offices that found that donald trump violated the law, said he disagreed with it which was incredible. had a whole other investigation going. there's no question that -- i'm not going through the others because that evidence is talked about over and over again in the impeachment trial itself. >> i'm just told mcconnell is hold up in the office. hit pause and take us -- again, parnas' credibility will be evaluated by everyone in charge of adjudicating justice but talking about not getting that step. >> this is the key is that he said he had corroborating evidence. i would not take lev parnas at his word and ill want that evidence. a quick thing before we

. >> thanks for having m >> reporter: so before we get to the administration's proposed changes,an you just remind us this law was signed 50-something years ago by richard nixonat's the intent, the original intent of the law? >> well, this was signed in ation ofong with the cre the environmental protection agency itself by president nixon, and the purpose of it is to make sure that everything that the governmena hand in is good to the en so whether it's a road or ar bridge oil pipeline, tre needs to be an environmental review on that, ad that's why both backerand detractors in this law say it ois onef the most let gated laws in america. >> reporter: foar 50 yers, this law has been in place, and if you want to build a bridge, dig a mine, you have to somehow prove on paper h te's whe impact of my project would be? >> right. they're cantled environ impact statements, and if you are following the keystone xl fight closely, as i was for the last decade, you would know that that fight was aout the e.i.s. and supplemental e.i.s.s and supplemental e.i.s.s, the were multiple of those written, and that's the argument trump and others cited for why this law needs to be