but he does not have a privilege of self-defense as to richard mcginnis. the law of self-defense allows the defendant to threaten or intentionally use force against another only if the defendant believed that there was an actual or imminent interference with the defendant's person, that he believed that the amount of force he used or threatened to use was necessary to prevent or term nate the interference, and that his beliefs were reasonable. the defendant may intentionally use force, which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm only if the defendant reasonably believed that the force used was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself. the belief may be reasonable even though mistaken in determining whether the defendant's beliefs were reas reasonable, the standard is what a person of ordinary intelligence and prudence would have believed in the defendant's position under the circumstances existing at the time of the alleged offense. the reasonableness of the defendant's beliefs must be determined from the stan

you must consider the law of self-defense in deciding whether the defendant's conduct as to richard mcginnis was reckless conduct which showed utter disregard for human life, but the defendant does not have a privilege of self-defense with respect to mr. mcginnis. so the defendant would enjoy a privilege of self-defense with respect to mr. rosenbaum if you find of the factual ingredients of that. but that doesn't mean that if he endangered the safety of mr. mcginnis was privileged under the law of self-defense because mr. mcginnis was not attacking him. however, you must consider the law of self-defense in deciding whether the defendant's conduct as to richard mcginnis was criminally reckless conduct with utter disregard for human life but he does not have a privilege of self-defense as to richard mcginnis. the law of self-defense allows a defendant to threaten or intentionally use force against another only if the defendant believed that the dash imminent with another person and he believes the amount of force he used or threatened to use was necessary to prevent or terminate the interferen

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant not guilty. as to the third count of the information, unknown male, we the jury find the defendant not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, we would the jury find the defendant not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, we the jury find the defendant not guilty. >> members of the jury, these are your unanimous verdicts? is there anyone who does not agree with the verdicts as read? ok. ok, folks, your job is done. we started about three weeks ago and i told you it could last two weeks, two days. this is three weeks. you were a wonderful jury to work with. her punctual, attentive -- you were punctual, attentive, six over here had the very difficult job of keeping from discussing the case during the time they were sequestered as well. all of you, i could not have asked for a better jury to work with. it has truly been my pleasure. i think without commenting on your verdict, the verdicts themselves, just in terms of your attentiveness and cooperation you gave to us, it justi

as i said, it he put richard mcginnis in danger.en in videos, goes to try and help joseph rosenbaum. he has his own video and as he shows when he first gets there, he finds mr. rosenbaum's body facedown on the ground. i'm going to play this exhibit 15 for you. [inaudible] >> if you want to talk about medics and talk about people who care coming want to talk about people who were there trying to help. you just heard them and you just saw them. people who did not know joseph rosenbaum and they just knew that somebody needed help. while that is going on, the defendant flees. callously disregarding the body of the man that he shot and killed. as he is running off, he is lying to the crowd about what just happened. this is exhibit number 12. [yelling] >> the defendant says he pulled a gun. that statement, he pulled a gun, was a lie. it is not true. the defendant knew it was not true. he is lying to the crowd as he is running away. joseph rosenbaum did not have a gun and the defendant knew he did not have a gun. the defendant is lying to

next, richie richard mcginnis. reckless. and here mr. i'd like to talk about because the self-defense does not go to mr. mcginnis. if kyle was privileged in exercising self-defense against mr. rosenbaum, it carries over to the endangering count of mr. mcginnis. and mr. mcginnis specifically, if the -- i'm reading from an instruction, page number, second full paragraph, which you will be given. if the defendant was acting lawfully in self-defense, his conduct did not create an unreasonable risk to another. that is mr. mcginnis. ladies and gentlemen, when my client shot joseph rosenbaum, he feared for his life, he feared because of the prior threats, the prior statements and the violent acts that had been witnessed by my client. mr. mcginnis, as a witness, i think he helped us more than he hurt us. he talked about -- this was on cross for mr. binger. how do you know what mr. rosenbaum was thinking? because i don't. i know he yelled "fuck you" and lunged at kyle rittenhouse. why is he yelling the f.u.? one of two things. one to intimidate o

one of the lines that is "but the defendant does not have a privilege of self-defense has to richard mcginnis." after that, there's discussion about self-defense and what that means. on page 9 there's a sentence that says, "if the defendant was acting lawfully in self-defense, his conduct did not create an unreasonable risk to another." i had told you in an email that all the parties -- there was an incongruence in terms of how that reads. just for the record i wanted to make sure that was on there because i do think it's confusing. however, i know it's the patterned instruction. i know you took it from the pattern. >> i agree with you, it is the pattern. i'm not going to argue with you that it is confusing, but it's an accurate statement of the law. mr. mcginnis does not have a self-defense status because the defendant has no right of self-defense has to any harm he caused to mr. mcginnis. that's what the instruction is telling the jury. but if he was acting lawfully in self-defense with respect to mr. rosenbaum, then it kills one of the elements. i think i'm reading that right. it gives him

as to the second count, richard mcginnis, we the jury filed kyle rittenhouse not guilty. the third count, unknown male, we find the defendant not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, we the jury filed the defendant not guilty. as to the fist count of the information -- the fifth count, we find the defendant not guilty. >> members of the jury, these are unanimous verdicts? does anyone not agree with the verdicts just read? ok, folks, your job is done. >> kyle rittenhouse's defense attorney spoke to the media after the verdict. have a listen. >> to say that we were relieved would be a grossness understatement. kyle is not here. he is on his way home. he wants to get on with his life. he has a huge sense of relief for what the jury did to him today. he wishes none of this wld have ever happened. but as he said when he testified, he did not start this . and we are thankful in more ways than one that the jury finally got to hear the true story. and when i say the media, i a talking about social media and things like that, the story that came out from the beginnin

as to the 2nd count of the information, richard mcginnis. we the jury by the defendant, kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the 3rd kind of the information unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the foreign count of the information, anthony hubert: we the jury find the defendant kyle gate: written house not guilty. as to the account of the information gauge or as really a jury find the defendant, kyle, a written child age. right. health not guilty. members, the jury are these you are unanimous verdict. is there anyone who does not agree with the verdict says read or you wish the jury polled go. okay. okay folks, your job is done and we started extraordinary things from the courthouse and can archer, wisconsin. i thought i'd call written house collab. stayed on that verdict not guilty. oh count. unanimously. taking a sip of water now and i think it's fair to say that that is probably quite a very unexpected job of not guilty on all charges coll, rick, now it's the 18 year olds. ah, well then, 17 y

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> reporter: those jurors, seven women, five men, finding rittenhouse not guilty on all the charges. >> as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, gaige grosskreutz, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> reporter: immediately after, kyle rittenhouse bursts into tears, collapsing into his chair, embracing his attorney, overwhelmed by the moment. the jurors took their time sifting the evidence and law, deliberating for about 26 hours over the course of four days. lead prosecutor thomas binger briefly reacting to their verdict in court. >> the jury has represented our community in this trial and has spoken. >> reporter: rittenhouse claimed self-defense after he shot and killed joseph rosenbaum and anthony huber and wounded gaige grosskreutz during a protest last year over the police shooting of a black man in kenosha.

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse to the third count of the information, unknown male, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse, not guilty. one civil rights activist gave his response to the verdict from outside the courthouse. ok, 0k, folks, at yourjob is done. one civil rights activist gave his response to the verdict from outside the courthouse. there is no way that you can justify in the streets of america that an individual can carry an automatic weapon, and ar 15, and shoot —— an individual can carry an automatic weapon, an ar 15, and shoot and kill anybody for any reason. there is no way you canjustify it, not having a licence to drive, let alone a licence to carry this weapon. so thatjudicial bias that was in this case, this is the same office that found beyond their means to

the second count of the information richard mcginnis, we find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty to the third count of the information unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. the fourth count of information anthony huber we find kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information gaige grosskreutz we find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. >> sean: kyle rittenhouse based on the law and the evidence and video evidence and testimony is innocent. he acted in self-defense. this is backed by eyewitness accounts and even the prosecution's star witness backed this up in court. a jury confirmed what has been obvious for months. obvious to everyone acting in good faith. joe biden the democratic party and the mob and the media are not acting in good faith. they have not been the whole time. why? they rushed to judgment. they never bothered to review the evidence. they never reached out to witnesses as perusual. instead they do what they always do. rush to judgment -- then the smears and slander. a 17-year-old kyle rittenhouse in o

this is richard mcginnis. mcginnis was reporting from kenosha that night.e was just inches away when rittenhouse shot vic did child molester. why was he there, that's a whol other story. but the prosecutor hoped the shooting of this child molester as an act of senseless violence committed by a psychopath kyle rittenhouse. here is what rich mcginnis said he saw. >> you have no idea what he was ever thinking at any point in his life. even never been. >> i've never exchanged words with him, if that's what your question is. >> so your interpretation of what he was trying to do or wha he was intending to do or anything along those lines is complete guesswork, isn't it? >> well he said [bleep] you and then he reached for his weapon. >> while there's that. so i convicted child molester with a long and violent crimina history runs up to kyle rittenhouse in the middle of a right and tries to take his gun away, so kyle shot him. that's what happens according t the prosecution's own witness. and not just one witness, today the medical expert testified that joseph rose

was one of the lines says but the defendant does not have a privilege of self-defense as to richard mcginnisat means. on page 9 there is a sentence that says if the defendant was acting lawfully in self-defense, his conduct did not create an unreasonable risk to another. i had told you in an email that all the parties were involved and that i felt there was some incon grew -- just for the record i wanted to make sure it was on there. because i do think it's confusing. however, i know it's the pattern instruction and you took it from the pattern. >> it is the pattern and i won't argue with you that it is confusing but it is a statement of the law. mr. mcginnis does not have a self-defense status because he is -- the defendant has no right of self-defense -- [inaudible] and that's what the instruction is telling the jury. but if he was acting lawfully in self-defense with respect to mr. rosenbaum, then it kills one of the elements. i think i'm reading that right. it gives him absolution with respect to the element of-what is the precise element? it is -- it is part of element unreasonable and

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury, find the defendant kyle h. we, the jury, find the jury kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the

richard mcginnis is a journalist. he is a few feet behind rittenhouse. it is recklessly endangers.e was not hit. a minute and a half later, kyle rittenhouse has fallen down, on the ground in the street. count three is recklessly endangering this unknown male, the jump kick man. they don't know who he is. again, reckless endangering charge because kyle fired at him, did not hit him. count four is first-degree inte intentional homicide of anthony huber. one important note, we will hear the judge decide this morning whether he will let the jury include lesser-included offenses. if the jury does not find him guilty on the most serious charge, they can consider the next down. count five. we have the attempted first-degree intentional homicide at gaige grosskreutz. he gets hit in the arm, wounded, not killed. the least serious by far charge, count six, possession of a deadly weapon by a person under 18. he was 17 at the time. obviously, he possessed a weapon. that he wants a misdemeanor. the maximum is nine months. people usually don't go to prison for misdemeanors alone. >> how about th

he committed a first-degree reckless homicide against joseph rosenbaum, he put richard mcginnis' s lifen jeopardy. he intended to kill anthony huber and he attempted to kill gauge course for -- all of the settlements are true. amy: during his closing argument, defense attorney mark richards maintained kyle rittenhouse had acted in self-defense. >> kyle shot joseph rosenbaum to stop a threat to his person. i am glad he shot him because joseph rosenbaum had got that gun, i don't for a minute believe he wouldn't have used it against somebody else. he was irrational and crazy. amy: as the jury begins deliberations, wisconsin governor tony evers has put 500 national guard troops are on standby ahead of a verdict. meanwhile, in georgia, the trial is continuing for the three white men who hunted down and shot dead ahmaud arbery, a black jogger. on monday, judge timothy walmsley rejected a request from defense attorneys to declare a mistrial. the judge also said it was "reprehensible" for the defense to object to allowing black pastors sit with arbery family's -- family in the courtroom. last w

i mean you think after richard mcginnis' testimony last week you didn't think it could get any worset actually did with gauge's gage testimony as you played he agreed that kyle rittenhouse did not shoot him until after he put his hands down, advanced toward rittenhouse and pointed his handgun at his head. the videos have shown that eyewitness testimony has shown that. i was there for that portion of the shooting last year this was a tough case to begin with. as the media examples that you played just now, you would think this would be a slam dunk. you know, a lot of people have had a throat say about this case. but, they clearly didn't even bother to look at the evidence even before the trial started. and they, you know, even people today, they clearly haven't paid attention to the trial. >> lawrence: you know, julio, something interesting and i would argue dangerous happened in this case. this was a case strictly on emotion. and, you know, a lot of people made the argument that he should not have been there. you can feel that way. you can say i think is he a terrible guy, all that t

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h. rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the third count of information, unknown male, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h. rittenhouse, not guilty. has to fourth count of information anthony hub e we the jury find the defendant not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, gaige grosskreutz, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h. rittenhouse, not guilty. >> members of the jury, are these your unanimous verdicts? is there anyone that does not agree with the verdicts as read? you wish the jury polled? >> no. >> okay. folks, your job is done. >> i really think it's a time for people to do a check of head and heart. two things can be true at once. again, the law, as drafted in wisconsin, is a huge factor in this ruling. that law gave the shooter a right to do what he did. but it can also be true that kyle rittenhouse didn't do the right thing. legally justified but still wrong. might this encourage vigilantes, this verdict? sure. but know this, if you're one of them, you're making a mi

and the count two is first-degree recklessly endangering the safety of richard mcginnis. count three, we will move out of the parking lot and onto the street scene where kyle rittenhouse is on the scene. this is anthony huber, the person who hit him with a skateboard. and rittenhouse shot him once in the heart. that is a maximum sentence of life in prison. count four, still on the street, attempted first-degree intentional homicide of gaige grosskreutz. he approaches him on the street, hits him in the arm, wounds him. does not kill him. that is why it is an attempted charge. a max there of 60 years. and count five is recklessly endangering the safety of this unknown man. he comes in and gives rittenhouse a flying kick. they don't know who this person is. the allegation is he shot at or in the direction of this person, endangering him. and count six is different from all the others. it is a misdemeanor, possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. obviously, he possessed a weapon. he was se17 at the time. the max is nine months. each of these six counts stands al

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. as to the third count of the information, unknown male, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber will be jury find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information. we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. >> members of the jury, are these your unanimous verdict? is there anyone who does not agree with the vertex as read? is there alone does not agree with the verdicts as read? your job is done. we started just about three weeks ago. i told you it could last two weeks into days. this is three weeks. you are a wonderful jury to work with. you are punctual. you are attentive. the forgotten six over here who had a very difficult job of keeping from discussing the case during the time that they were sequestered as well. all of you, i couldn't have asked for a better jury to work with. it has truly been my pleasure. i think with

richard mcginnis telling jurors joseph rosenbaum, the first man killed, was unarmed. >> did you everpon on mr. rosenbaum? >> i did not. . >> never saw a gun on mr. rosenbaum. >> i did not. >> never saw him have a knife? >> no. >> never saw a club or bat or chain, anything like that? >> i just saw the bag. that was thrown that was it. >> reporter: the daily caller taking this video interviewing rittenhouse prior to the shooting. >> that's why i have my weapons, to protect myself. >> reporter: explaining what happened right before the gunfire started. >> my eyes were fixated on the barrel of the weapon because i didn't want to end up on the receiving end of that. >> reporter: and testifying rosenbaum appeared to lunge toward rittenhouse at the same time rittenhouse shot him. . >> the shots were fired when his momentum was going forward and that continued until rosenbaum was on the ground. >> reporter: he was emotional and sometimes looking away as they showed the first shooting and him helping rosenbaum afterward. . >> is it hard for you to see that? . >> i certainly don't like to watc

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. guilty. as to the third count of the information, unknown male, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, gaige grosskreutz, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> members of the jury, are these your unanimous verdicts? is there anyone who does not agree with the verdicts as read? >> lucky, young man. can you imagine that moment? first thing i'd be saying -- thank you, jesus. thank you, god. fall on your knees. lucky. kyle rittenhouse who shot and killed two people, wounded another during protests in august of 2020 over the police shooting of jacob blake, found not guilty on all counts. you heard 'em read right there. the bar was really high for a conviction, though. prosecutors had to prove it wasn't self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. now, you can question what a th

as to the second count of the information richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouseuilty. as to the third count of the information unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information gaige grosskreutz, we find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. >> members of the jury, these are your unanimous verdicts? is there anyone who does not agree with the verdicts as read? amy: in a statement, the parents of anthony huber, one of the protesters killed by rittenhouse, said they were heartbroken and angry and that the verdict "sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street." the jury's decision in the kyle rittenhouse case was widely decried by racial justice activists and many politicians. naacp president derrick johnson tweeted -- "the verdict in the #kylerittenhou

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the third count of information unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, gauge grosskreutz, we the jury find kyle rittenhouse not guilty. >> neil: not guilty on all counts. we're told kyle rittenhouse is on his way home and trying to get his leaf back together. you're looking on the right-hand side of the scene, kenosha wisconsin where the governor was concerned for the possibility of violence that he mobilize or was preparing to mobilize up to 500 national guard troops. we do see a stepped up legal presence there and police presence there. but so far there's been no problems there. welcome, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. this is "your world" on the impact of the case that is perhaps the most scrutinized and publicized since going back to o.j. simpson nearly two decades ago. what is at stake

as to second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. as to third count of the information, unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. as to fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to fifth count of the information, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> members of the jury, are these your unanimous verdicts? is there anyone that does not agree with verdicts as read? do you wish the jury polled? >> the 18-year-old, rittenhouse, seen collapsing in apparent emotion, amidst the verdict. man who killed two blm protesters in wisconsin, injured a third, a man who brought an illegally obtained rifle to the protest. the news today is he walks. no one knows what the jury discussed in private deliberations. we know the evidence they saw. we know they saw emotional testimony by rittenhouse taking the stand, a legal rarity, didn't hurt him, may have helped him because he got off. we know they saw video evi

there is richard mcginnis, the journalist out that night, etna huber, jeffrey rosenbaum, gaige grosskreutzied to get protect the lives of others in the community. i think that's important to note. we're focused on the two deceased members and the sole survivor of it -- and gaige grosskreutz but there are other victims in this situation. >> that's a helpful clarification. can you speak how the testimony of kyle rittenhouse, how did it strike you? >> well, frankly, i thought his testimony came frankly slightly inauthentic. i think there was definitely things that he said that were inconsistent with the evidence. for instance, he stated that he would not be -- and there is physical -- there is video evidence and audio evidence you can hear him reracking his gun. and why is that significant? that shows, that demonstrates to me that mr. rittenhouse actually pulled the trigger against my client twice. the first -- the only way you know that -- you have to rerack your gun, if there is a jam or something happening or malfunction with your first pulling of the trigger. he turned his weapon on my cl

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury, find the defendant kyle h.tenhouse not guilty. as to the third count of the information, unknown male, we, the jury, find the jury kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information gauge crews crucify we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> shannon: breaking tonight an emotional reaction in the verdict of the trial of the illinois teenager charged with murdering two protesters and injuring a third during a protest in wisconsin during the summer of 2020. kyle rittenhouse goes free. we will have analysis of the decision shortly. welcome to washington. i'm shannon bream in for bret baier. the teenager's lawyer says rittenhouse is undergoing counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder and probably move away from the area because it's too dangerous for him to stay. the prosecution says it respects the jury's decision. we will hear what president

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> reporter: the 18-year-old trembling with emotion as all five counts were read out. >> as to the fifth count of the information, gaige grosskreutz, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> reporter: the verdict from the jury unanimous. not guilty on all charges. moments after the verdict, rittenhouse shared his relief as seen in this tucker carlson originals trailer. >> how do you feel, man? >> the jury reached the correct verdict. self-defense is not illegal and i believe they came to the correct verdict. >> reporter: the jurors, seven women and five men, sifted the evidence and law deliberating for roughly 26 hours. rittenhouse claimed self-defense after he shot and killed joseph rosenbaum and anthony huber and wounded gaige grosskreutz during a protest last year over the police shooting of jacob blake. after the verdict rosenbaum's fiancee spoke out. >> in this case it feels like the victims' lives don't matter and i don't think th

richard mcginnis testified, i rode with rosenbaum in the back of that suv. i told him, we will have a beer together when this is all done. mr. rosenbaum was unable to respond. the defendant decided to pull the trigger on his ar-15 four times. that was his decision. he is responsible for every bullet that comes out of that gun. he doesn't get a pass by pulling the trigger fast. he could have chosen to stop after the first shot, after the second shot, after the third shot. and assess whether or not there was still a need to keep firing. but he went four times in .76 seconds on the defense has made a big point of this, how fast he fired. does this somehow excuse you? exactly the opposite ladies and gentlemen, he controls how quickly he pulls the trigger. he's in control of that decision-making process. no one else made him do that. this is indicative of someone who doesn't care about the consequences, doesn't care to stop and figure out, and my good, do i need to stop or am i just going to keep on going? he tracks the body all the way to the ground which is the

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the third count of information unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle hch. rittenhouse not guilt. we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rigttenhouse not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, gaige grosskreutz, we, the jury, find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> rittenhouse, overcome with emotion. breaking down in tears collapsing. a reporter inside the courtroom describing members of the jury as looking fatigued. some appearing ill at ease while their decision was read. again, these juries spent more than 25 hours together reaching their decision. it was a decision they didn't take lightly. during their tldeliberations, ty asked to get copies of the jury instructions, right? those 36 pages. they asked to re-watch much of the video evidence in the case, including fbi surveillance video and drone video of one of the shootings and the crucial moment of -- of what happened. and even yesterday, one juror did ask

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis we, the jury by the defendant, kyle age rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the third kind of the information unknown male we, the jury find the defendant, kyle rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information. anthony huber. we, the jury find the defendant, kyle rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information gauge grosskreutz w, the jury find the defendant, kyle kyle rittenhouse, not guilty. the jury cleared rittenhouse of all charges in the fatal shooting of two men and the wounding of a third during a civil rights protest last year in kenosha. the jury came back with a decision after about 3.5 days of deliberation. written the house has been charged with homicide had been charged with homicide, attempted homicide and reckless endangering. prosecutors say he was a vigilante, but his defense lawyers say he acted in self defense. a small group has started to gather outside the courthouse here at home. we're also following breaking news in san francisco. this is where authorities are investigating an inci

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse. as to the third count of the information, unknown male, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse, not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, we the jury find the defendant, kyle h rittenhouse, not guilty. that was the product as it was delivered in the last two hours in kenosha wisconsin. mr kyle rittenhouse�*s attorney said he was thankful to the jury for coming to what he described as the correct verdict. to what he described as the correct verdict. ., _ ., ., verdict. to say that we were are relieved would _ verdict. to say that we were are relieved would be _ verdict. to say that we were are relieved would be a _ verdict. to say that we were are relieved would be a christmas l relieved would be a christmas understatement. kyle is not here, he is on his way home, he wants to get on with his life, he has a huge sense of relief for what the j

as to the second count of the information, richard mcginnis, we the jury kind the defendant not guilty. as to the third count of the information unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. as to the fourth count of the information, anthony huber, we the jury find the defendant not guilty. as to the fifth count of the information, gaige grosskreutz, we the jury find the defendant kyle h. rittenhouse not guilty. >> members of the jury, these are unanimous verdicts. is there anyone who does not agree with the verdicts as read? >> okay. okay, folks, your job is done, and we started just about three weeks ago. and i told you it could last two weeks and two days. this is three weeks. you were a wonderful jury to work with. you were punctual, attentive. and the forgotten six over here who have very difficult job of keeping from discussing the case during the time they were sequestered as well, all of you, you just -- i couldn't have asked for a better jury to work with. and it has truly been my pleasure. i think without commenting on your verdict, the verdicts

. >> the count of the information richard mcginnis we the jury find the defendant kyle h rittenhouseto the third count of the information of an unknown male, we the jury find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. as for the fourth count anthony uber, we find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. and for the fifth count of information, we find the defendant kyle h rittenhouse not guilty. >> members of the jury the unanimous verdicts. is there anyone that does not agree with the vertex as read? >> your job is done and we started about three weeks ago. i told you it could last two weeks and two days. this is three weeks. you were a wonderful jury to work with, you are punctual, intensive in the forgotten six over here who had to have a very difficult job of keeping from discussing the case. i couldn't have asked for a better jury to work with and it has truly been my pleasure. without commenting on your verdict, the vertex themselves just in terms of attentiveness and cooperation that you gave to us, justifies the confidence that the founders of our country placed in you.