my name is richard morales, debt manager of the puc. i'm here to present a water revenue bond, specifically 2017 series abc water revenue bonds, present this item for your consideration today. the last time we presented a bond sale to you was in september, 2016. so just over a year ago. at that time, you authorized two series of water revenue bonds. the 2016 a and b water funding bonds, that resulted in rate-payer savings and also a series of 2016 taxable bonds that sold in december. i won't go through it for the sake of time, but a few items that we need to cover. in september, you were presented with a capital financing plan for fiscal year 2018 that listed the transactions that you see on this slide. this transaction was the first of the transactions. so we are keeping to what we planned in the capital financing plan, moving forward with this item. brief description of the transaction, the bonds consist of three sub series. last time bonds were funded for wsup, 2016. b, regional and local water projects. and sub series c, hechi. it w

this is what richard blumenthal said about the moral responsibility the republicans will bear. take a listen. >> the republican party will bear a moral responsibility and political accountability for their failure to stand up and speak out against this kind of absolutely abhorrent use of the public media, and it is a disgrace. >> but by and large, jonathan, there's no daylight here. you have jeff flake saying he's going to give some speeches but aside from that there really has not been a ton of movement on that front. >> unless as time goes on, not more, republicans were much more nervous about trump, much more distance between him and them during the campaign and even at the beginning of the presidency and they just seem to have gotten tighter and tighter and they're more and more intimidated and i think what steve bannon is doing with his outside group targeting members of the senate is he's trying to identify anyone who's not going to stand behind trump, anyone who might raise a 25th amendment challenge and try to knock them out and make the party complete ly fall in line w

morales. and i'm craig melvin. and this is dateline on mynetworktv. where richard was killed. ce at night. one way or another, that's an execution. absolutely. natalie morales (voiceover): they were a busy married couple, meeting up for a romantic valentine's night rendezvous. but that night, someone had other plans. natalie morales (voiceover): before she even arrived, her husband was dead. i could see him laying on the ground. i couldn't think of a soul that would want to hurt the man. natalie morales (voiceover): then someone let a secret slip. soon, police were questioning a suspect with a motive who had suddenly changed his looks. and in fact, when he showed up at work that morning, he was beardless.

moment you know ok that's just that's just i'm sorry michael richards said but it's been the same enormous pressure and that's and that's a moral hazard is well that's moral hazard it is aids it puts you to position where you don't have to take care yourself that it's irresponsible go ahead gilbert and brussels go it or like to deal with one other issue around china because china has been again in newspapers coverage in financial times and elsewhere in the last couple of days with remarks that she is seeking a. moment of equality with the united states as a world power now this takes us back a bit i can see this coming from within the state department promoting that notion because in the ocean which promoted under obama people spoke about a g. two well never was a g two there isn't one today so i think it will be with us if this issue of she pushing back i think that's a figment of imagination of the american foreign policy community and not a reality that in china at the time china is buying time china is waiting for the time when it will perceive the states as the world's largest economy and possibly also was the world's larg

morale of the north vietnamese because they thought they were beating us. concept was fatally point, and to prove that was when the tall in paris had broken down, finally richard nixon said go in and wipe them out. we went in with b-52s and other aircraft than just took out all resistance. guess what? they agreed to negotiate. the problem i think had a lot to with the belief that somehow you can convince the injury to doesomise, when the enemy not think that they are being beaten. and the tet offensive, there's so much we can talk about, was so much of morale boost and the chinese and russians for giving them everything they wanted. still the most heavily defended place in the history of the with the russian surface to air missiles. most people are not going to believe this, but a russian ship ,howed up in haiphong harbor offloaded to a vehicle, put in place, and while we watched it, we watched it, and then those missiles were fired at american aircraft. it's worse than ridiculous. the first target i had when i was in combat had already been bombed 12 times. it was a rebel. so i went in and bond the rubble. that's not the way to fight a war. tape, he said the

if anybody in the republican party had a spine or a brain or a moral compass. >> can i ask richard, beforet to back into the news because we have a lot of news on north korea. >> that's what i wanted to ask richard. how dangerous are things right now regarding north korea? let's set this up first and then we'll get into it. how dangerous are things? am i overstating the possibility of war with north korea? >> the short answer is no. i think the possibility of an incident between american and north korean aircraft or ships is significant. what worries me, if there were to be some kind of incident, north korea puts a radar on an american b 1 bomber, ships collide or get close to one another at sea, does anyone think these two governments given the level of vet y'all able to manage a cries snis not necessarily the bolt from the blue that either side introduces a long range missile. what worries me is something that would escalate out of an incident that we don't have the diplomatic capacity and the relationship to control. it's one of the monday reasons -- >> our south korean -- our ambassado

member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what's political and start doing what's right. our country depends on it. >>> welcome back. i'm richardui in new york city. here's what we are watching for. u.s. military confirming u.s. member was killed in eastern afghanistan in result of wounds operation in the province. u.s. forces commander sent his condolences to the fallen member's family. >>> and dnc donna brazile saying she considered ousting from the campaign. this happened after clinton looked unsteady after she left a september 11th memorial and brought up questions about her well-being. >>> and carter pager former adviser to trump campaign telling nbc he had encounter with russian deputy prime minister in 2016 while on a trip to moscow. page emphasized his claim to nbc that it was not a meeting but just a quote brief hello and greeting. >>> all right next for you crimp cal case against harvey weinstein, nypd says they are building a case that could lead to arrest. and top of the history my colleague jacob soboroff will be live in washington on the president's 12-day tour of asia. i love kiwis. i've always had that issue wit

fact my friend richard dawkins foundation did a study of people who declared themselves as christian and in england after a census and most of them said exactly that religion is user morality and my big problem with religion if i have one is that and i get letters every day from people who say i feel like a bad person because i question the existence of god and the people around me make me feel like a bad person because religion is used more ality and if you just say look i don't accept it you're viewed as a bad person and i think both reson i would agree that's not true certainly not true in fact poll after poll shows that the most moral community in the united states is atheists but i do think that both lawrence and i being professors and academics need to do something first and foremost before we can continue this conversation and that is define our terms because first first of all we're not talking about religion we're talking about faith and those are two separate things we could have a conversation about whether it's right for people to replace scientific fact with mythologies and legends of course it's not but i do think that it's important to understand that that's

moral election. it's -- gubernatorial election. it's five days away. we told you about the voter anny but it does not stop big money flowing in the campaign. richard reeve takes us to the podium and is following the money. >> thank you for being here. richard democrat northam north, republican ed gillespie. >> their vision for the future of virginia is. richard: both campaigning and raising big bucks. >> it's expensive to run for governor. richard: $11 million by northam and $10 million by gillespie. >> no average joe could just get the money. richard: a necessary evil in a battleground state in a close race. >> money matters in a state large number of big cities and you have to reach a lot of voters. richard: this is the stuff that fuels most political campaigns. for months, all last summer, northam had a huge financial advantage over gillespie, 2-to-1 at some point. but now pretty much it's even money. northam with $1.7 million left in the campaign coffers. gillespie, $1.4 million. >> with numbers like that, that is coming from big, big donors. not individual donors. richard: he's right. the virginia public access process, campaign watchdog grou

morale at langley in the cia. they wonder if he's a politician first or dci first. but richard mentioned history. and history's judgment on all of this. and sadly -- i truly regret to say this, but i -- all weekend lo long, watching and following this trip, we can't wait for history. the judgment is being made now. world leaders are laughing at our president of the united states who stands on foreign soil, attacks two career intelligence officials, bren sben clapper, calls them hacks. attacks a former director of the fbi, calls him a liar. all of this happening after rejects tpp that you alluded to and while he rejects it and while they roll out a red carpet and they give him a big crowd and he's thrilled, saying things like nobody has ever seen this before for any foreign leader in china, they are picking our pockets. we are the united states of america and, regretfully -- i regret to say this. the president of the united states is without a clue as to who we are and what this country represents. >> members of the -- >> well, moving on from that. >> really. >> uplifting way to start the morning.

moral conflict. >> i wouldn't vote for the baby killer for hell nor high water. um, i don't believe in murdering children. >> reporter: show host richard dixon thinks trump's words will help moore, some. >> roy moore supporters who weren't all excited about voting for roy moore once this came out, even a weak endorsement from trump might get those people excited. alabama is very much trump country. >> reporter: no one here seems to think that trump's backing is any game changer, not in a state where voters take pride in putting a thumb in the eye of the establishment, even the republican establishment. >> even if all of these allegations were proven definitively to be positive, i would still vote for him over doug jones. >> what we're getting nationally is, oh, alabamans would vote for a pedophile over a liberal democrat. >> in this circumstance, yes. >> reporter: now let's get to the bad news coming out of the roy moore campaign and that is the communications director, that's john rodgers, suddenly called it quits. the campaign is trying to downplay this, saying this was a decision they reached last friday. however, they also say it's

being a moral compass, somebody who as president we like to think, watching robin hood movies, the king or the president, richard the lion heart shows up, he will do the right thing and he will be the right person, and the leadership. and pro-war widow. and if he gets 45 he is happy. and is accountable, both play the division game, gets more money into the coffers. a moral compass, remember, when it comes to this, tell us the right decision, how do we deal with north korea or these questions? how do we deal with iran, do we have a moral judgment, these issues i too quit tricky without moral violence and human beings to divide sometimes. bobby kennedy and your spirit running against donald trump this year you have a good candidate, very good candidate. bobby is more interesting than jack because he is accessible. and that overlooked -- a friend of mine, his love life with women was pretty amazing that way, he said people don't mind being used, they mind being discarded. isn't that everything? discarded. this archie bunker thing in the early 70s making fun of white working people, kissed them goodbye. deplorable,

with richard jewel and duke lacrosse and ferguson and trump having the possibility of winning or baltimore where the media has gotten it wrong so many times. my question is here you see selective moral outrage and the question of defending the clintons for 30 years comes into play. i want to get your reaction to all of that and what you think of this double standard. >> look, when i look back some day and realize we were the generation that had to put up with the clintons for our entire life. that may be ending. this may all be coming to a head. it's conceivable that a year or two from now they will have disappeared and finally we'll be free at last. >> sean: yeah. all right, mr. speaker. i like ricola. if you need my doctor who helps in these moments i will give you offline. i don't want to be encouraging the use of medicines because i'm not a doctor and i don't play one on tv. i hope you feel better. >> okay. >> sean: i would have talked less. you seem to feel better. you will monica crowley and tammy bruce are here to react to the democratic party's sexual harassment problems that are getting worse tonight. later, we will talk to a former federal prosecutor whose warning robert m

moral compass. somebody who actually -- we like to thing, the time we're kids watching robin hood movies, when the king or the president, richard the lyon heart shows up, he will do the right thing, be the right person, if it comes down to a judgment, we don't have any of those thing notices our leadership. we don't have empathy, true empathy. even for a war widow. we do not have unity because the person at the top wants to vision because if he can get his 40% he is happy. if he can get 35, he's happy. as long as he gets that. so division is working. people against him play the same game but i don't hold them as accountable because they're rocketing but both sides love to play the division game. more moneys into the coffers. and third we lack a moral compass. someone who can remember -- when it really comed to crunch and isn't political anymore, the right decision, how to deal with north korea. somebody that is iran, a moral judgment that helps us? i think we need a moral judgment. these issues are too tricky without a moral guidance. impossible for human beings to decide sometimes. you need something moral to guide you. and i