raven chief justice of the united states richard russell senator of georgia john sherman cooper senator of kentucky hailbox representative of louisiana geraldford representative of michigan john jay mcloy presidential counsel ex-globation. are you sure you fired from the vault book. i think we'd better leave this topic. everything will be in the report in the evidence section to all the resources of the secret service and the cia the raven commission draws the following conclusions liharvi. oswald killed the president kennedy, he acted alone. he was not part of a conspiracy inside the country or outside. other details will be of interest to historians and those who care about details, but there was one piece of evidence that was not made public. the recording of her murder was made by abraham behind the pond. this murder is the most documented crime in american history and for those who want to understand everything is collected to the smallest detail. 55 years later crimes were given in the years that have passed since the report of the raven, the assassination of president kennedy has

. >> richard russell from medicine and active in three different government groups and the wisconsin coalition it's the free speech wisconsin looking to replace partisan primaries with final five voting, which is designed to eliminate the divisiveness and polarization that results from only the partisan activist being involved for the final two candidates for the final election. all three of these good government operations there's too many opt criminals. >> the beneficiaries saying vote against your own self-interest and this is a huge obstacle to overcomb and i was hoping you had helpful hints for us. >> thank you for that and i certainly appreciate the work that you're doing and i agree, this is kind of a central dielemma of try -- dilemma of trying to fix jerkins ray mannedderring and thehe people e people with the strongest incentives not to fix it are the people benefiting the most from the status quo and there's a reason why the states that have been successful at least so far have tended to be states where it's easier to amendment the state constitution using a ballot initiat

richard russell refused to participate in the work of the commission.er the very first meetings. he quickly became disillusioned with what was going on, including the role of edgar hoover and the acting attorney general nikolasabaha in his personal papers in the university library. dated december 5, 1963. it's the date of the first meeting of the commission that something strange happens, warren katzan. bach knows all about the fbi and it looks like they are going to make oswald the only suspect, such a position is unacceptable to me, judging by his archives, russell prepared a minority opinion to present him at the final meeting of the commission on september 18 that day, he shared his concerns with president johnson. who cares? there is practically no difference which bullet hit the connel, but the commission believes that the same bullet hit both the comedy and the connel. i do not believe in this. i don't believe either. it seems that the shooter was so accurate that the first shot hit, and the second shot was right in the head. i can't get in to si

i'm richard russell from madison. i'm active in three different good government groups, fair maps, wisconsin coalition, which addresses the very problem of been speaking about here. wisconsin united to amend which is looking for a constitutional amendment to overturn citizens united and get a constitutional amendment that says only actual human beings are people, corporations, churches etc. don't count and free spending is not the same as free speech and voters. first, wisconsin, which is looking to replace partizan primaries with final five voting, which is designed to eliminate divisive ness and the polarization that results from only the partizan activists being involved in determining who the final two candidates are for the final election. all three of these good government. operations face two major obstacles. first of all, is that all procedural changes that change the way we do business, they're not substantive things like abortion or immigration or inflation or guns crime or any of those things that that gut

[applause] >> hi there richard russell from madison i'm active in three different good government groups, which addresses that very problem you are speaking about here. wisconsin united to amend which is looking for constitutional amendment to overturn citizens a united. and get a constitutional amounts is only actual human beings are corporations corporations don't count freespending is not the same as free speech. voters first wisconsin is looking to replace the partisan primaries with final five voting. which is assigned to eliminate thee divisiveness and the polarization that results from only the partisan activist being involved in determining who the final two candidates are for the final election. all three of these good government operations face two major obstacles. first of all they are procedural changes they change the way we do business. they are not substantive things like abortion or immigration, or inflation, or guns or crimes or any of those things thatt are issues people can relate too. and they arese sort of abstractn that regard. but the second and major problem we ha

[applause] >> on richard russell from madison. active in three different good government groups, fair maps wisconsin coalition which addresses the very problem you've been speaking about here. wisconsin united to a man which is looking for a constitutional amendment to overturn citizens united and get a constitutional amendment that says only actual human beings. and freespending is not the same as free speech. and voters first wisconsin which is looking to replace partisan primaries with final five voting, which is designed to eliminate the divisiveness and the polarization that results from only a partisan activists being involved in determining who the final two candidates are for the final election. all three of these good government operations, face to face two major obstacles. first they change the way we do business. they are not substantive like things like abortion or immigration or inflation or guns were crying, or any of those things that are issues that people can viscerally relate to, and they are sort of abstract in

senator richard russell out of georgia had certainly had a different agenda.than the democratic mayor of chicago, or the republican mayor of new york. it is now so clearly drawn. it is now so clearly aligned with the party. it becomes easy. it seems a matter of common sense to misconstrue the justices's opinions with the ideology of the -- >> it's not a problem? >> i think it is an extraordinary problem. >> i think it is the primary problem for the chief justice. he is wrestling with it. he has wrestled with a quite publicly. i have been different opinions's. i don't think it is a matter of personal loyalty. i think that we are very far from that. the day that he gets confirmed, he or she is thinking, okay, thank you very much. i am here. the fact that so many decisions seem to conform so much with party audiology is a problem. i know we have to wrap up, but i want to say that the judicial branch actually has to produce. that is the difference here. whether it agrees or disagrees with what the supreme court decides, they have decisions for you. you can read th

richard russell from madison. you've probably heard phrase those who begin burning books. and by burning people. and i was a little concerned about your metaphor of uprooting and taking things out by the roots, because it sounds to me like you're advocating purging. how how do you i can understand purging ideas or trying to overcome ideas, but it sounds suspiciously like purging people. how how do you go about reconciling those concepts? i'm you brought this up, richard. thank you. i'm not for i'm not for silencing any idea. actually, i think ideas, as horrible as they might, as i think i said. right, i'm pretty close to an absolutist on free speech. but i do think richard that institu tions need to be remade, that our institutions carry certain history with them. and so i'm for uprooting institutions. i'm for us looking long and hard, the institutions we have and saying, do they serve the purposes we have agreed they should serve? let me give you one that i don't think is actually partizan increasing the size of the house representatives. as i said, we've done it every de

raven chief justice of the united states richard russell senator of georgia john sherman cooper senator

what bill gavin wo was a speechwriter for richard nixon and a very good writer called streetcorner conservativism. these were conservatives not familiar with russell kirk the great traditionalist author. rats. they're part of fdr coalition and yet the late 1960s and early 1970s that looked on the television screen about read the newspapers and sent what is happening to my country? rising crime, raising drug abuse, critic party but the new rights revolution taking place. they began moving into the republican column for the become too known as hats. they tend to be blue-collar. the b tend to not have attaineda college degree. the critical to richard nixon's landslide went in 1972. they become part of the right over the years there the reagan democrats. it swerved toward perrault in 1992 but newt gingrich brings them back in the 94. this another group as well's or liberal anti-communist. they are democrats who for the same reasons as the hardhats found themselves outll of sync n the 1970s when irving kristol endorses richard nixon in 1972. it is a scandal. they do not make the jump well into the 1980s. his neoconservative intellectuals who are oftene

richard all sent both himself and kevin madison, out of the race. on the very 1st later charlotte found himself knocked into the wall. ill, my clear sailing for an emotional, george russell. take his 1st step forward one. for now break. dancing is gearing up for the olympic spotlight when it debuted at the games in 2024. the sport held its world championships over the weekend in new york, where it all began some 50 years ago. 15 year olds, indiana sergio, one there. well title, even if her main rival didn't think much of her routine that makes instant favorite for a gold medal impact. so joe is the 1st competitor to win the was which it had the youngest f you watching d w. c. as a reminder of our top story, joe biden has told china there must not be another cold war for you as president met his chinese kind of how she did the ping and indonesia ahead of the g. 20 summit that the 2 nations off our path issues like taiwan and ukraine, guidance that tensions cannot be allowed to escalate into conflict and ukraine's president. for those events, he has visited the liberated city of camps on to congratulate the troops who have ended. 8 months of russian occupation from them, r

richard nixon called streetcorner conservatives. these were conservatives who were not familiar with hayek, not from a your with russell kirk, traditionalist author but they were often democrats. part of if they are's majority coalition and in the late 1960s and early 1970s they read their newspapers and said what is happening to my country? rising crime, rising drug abuse, dissolving families, democratic party wracked by an argument over vietnam and the revolution taking place so they begin moving into the republican column and they come to be known as hardhats because they tend to be blue-collar, they tend to not having attained a college degree so the hardhats entered the republican coalition and are critical to richard nixon's landslide when in the 1972 and become part of the right over the years, the reagan democrats. they swerve toward ross perot in 1992 but newt gingrich brings them back in 1994. they are defendants anyway, the trump silent majority, the forgotten man. another group as well comes into the right in the 1970s, the neoconservatives. these were liberal anti-communists, democrats who for the same reasons as the hardhats

richard nixon, very dgood writer. he called it streetcorner conservatism and these are conservatives who are not familiar with russell kirk come the great traditionalist author but they in fact, often with democrats and they were part of fdr's majorityet coalition it ad in the late 1960s, and early 1970s, they looked on televisionws screens over the newspapers and they said, what is happening to my country rising crime, rising drug abuse, and dissolving families. democratic artie an argument over to vietnam and the new rights resolutions taking place to begin moving into the republican column. they come to be known as the hardhats. because attentively blue-collar and tend to be not having obtain a college degree and they enter this republican coalition and they are critical to richard nixon's website went in 1972. they become part of the right over the years there were the reagan democrats. they swerved towards perrault in 1992, and new leaders bring them back in and 94. the defendants are descendents anyway of their the trump silent majority or the forgotten man. as of the roof as well that comes into the right in t

richard nixon and a very good writer called street corner conservatives. these were conservatives who were not familiar with hayek who are not familiar with russell kirk thereat traditionalist author. but they in fact often were democrats. right. they were part of fdr's majority coalition and yet in the late 1960s and early 1970s. they looked on their television screens and read their newspapers and said what is happening to my country? right rise and crime rising drug abuse. dissolution dissolving families a democratic party racked by an argument over vietnam and the new rights revolutions that are taking place. and so they begin moving into the republican column. and they come to be known as the hard hats. because they tend to be blue collar. they tend to be not having attained a college degree. so the hard hats enter this republican coalition and they're critical to richard nixon's landslide win in 1972, and they become part of the right. over the years they're the reagan democrats. they are they swerve toward perot in 1992, but newt gingrich brings them back in in 94. there there descendants. anyway are the the trump silent majority or forgotten man,