give you an example in two thousand there was a collider starting up in the united states called rick c. and similar concerns two hundred were raised about the rate being able to produce something called a strange little particle that will eventually devour the earth and nothing like that has happened at all there is agree with jordan completely this is a lot of scaremongering and you know it's interesting that it's just the same people talking about this there are you can you you can go to the cern website and for instance look up all the papers that have been written on this and have been peer reviewed by scientists so you know one thing i would like to point out that these are you know thousands of scientists working on this project and we know the thousands of scientists are working on this project a lot of you know their careers are taken they don't want to be devoured by a black hole i mean that would be silly so you know there might be noble prices in there waiting for some people and to think that all of that will go to waste because you know if a black hole they're not foolish

had a contingency -- if any progress that the rick, did you ever not use them if they were already at the rig with the equipment? >> we normally did not run c bl's in exploration. on this well we had them out at the location. i had lined up to come out to the location, and the only reason we are going to use them is if we lost returns. if they lost returns, did not see what we call lived pressure, if you did not see that left pressure and you lost returns, we are going to run them. >> as well sought later, are you ever involved in the scheduling of manifest for people on the rig? >> 3 clark did that. >> do you sign off on that? >> no, i did not. what is went and told them who we had coming, and they took care of the rest of it. >> hypothetically, if a person was scheduled to be on a flight on april 20 at 10:00 in the morning, would that have to be preapproved on the day before the 19th? >> yes, it would. >> so if schlumberger on the reed to run a cement bond law of the 20th because the job was being performed at midnight of the 19th for the 20th, how exactly would that be a contingent on blog, and i know you were not on the rate so i am not

had a contingency -- if any progress that the rick, did you ever not use them if they were already at the rig with the equipment? >> we normally did not run c bl's in exploration. on this well we had them out at the location. i had lined up to come out to the location, and the only reason we are going to use them is if we lost returns. if they lost returns, did not see what we call lived pressure, if you did not see that left pressure and you lost returns, we are going to run them. >> as well sought later, are you ever involved in the scheduling of manifest for people on the rig? >> 3 clark did that. >> do you sign off on that? >> no, i did not. what is went and told them who we had coming, and they took care of the rest of it. >> hypothetically, if a person was scheduled to be on a flight on april 20 at 10:00 in the morning, would that have to be preapproved on the day before the 19th? >> yes, it would. >> so if schlumberger on the reed to run a cement bond law of the 20th because the job was being performed at midnight of the 19th for the 20th, how exactly would that be a contingent on blog, and i know you were not on the rate so i am not