anything but that for rick sander, at least on the intro that i read. stuart taylor on the other hand would pass as a card-carrying moderate. never found any issue on which he couldn't say on the one hand and then on the other hand. in any event we are now going to hear from two critics from either side on both the book and the case. first from roger clay and then from alan morrison. roger clay is president and general counsel of the center for equal opportunity. he focuses on legal issues arising from civil-rights laws including the regulatory impact on business and the problems in higher education created by affirmative-action. a former deputy assistant attorney general in the reagan and bush administration, he held the second highest positions in the civil-rights division and the environment in natural resources division. he has held several other positions in the justice department including assistant to the solicitor general, associate deputy attorney general and acting assistant attorney general in the office of legal policy. he is a graduate of y

rick sander is here from ucla law school. we will hear from him about the program he has set up later on the socio-economic affirmative action. these at the data from 2011. ucla had a strong program of providing a leg up to economically disadvantaged students. you can see that in the data when you look at african american students, 22 of 63 african american students were admitted under the socio- economic program, which looked at economic disadvantage since, compared to only 12 out of 382 who were admitted through other programs. that is to say, more african american students were admitted through the socio-economic program than the regular program, even though the socio- economic program was much smaller. overall, if the look of the results at ucla law school, 56% of the students admitted through socio-economic affirmative- action were black or hispanic, compared to just 6% of those not admitted through this programs. how would this work at a national level? private and public universities? the century foundation sponsored r

rick sander is here from ucla law school. we will hear from him about the program he has set up later on the socio-economic affirmative action. these are the data from 2011. ucla had a strong program of providing a leg up to economically disadvantaged students. you can see that in the data when you look at african american students, 22 of 63 african american students were admitted under the socio- economic program, which looked at economic disadvantage since, compared to only 12 out of 382 who were admitted through other programs. that is to say, more african american students were admitted through the socio-economic program than the regular program, even though the socio- economic program was much smaller. overall, if the look of the results at ucla law school, 56% of the students admitted through socio-economic affirmative-action were black or hispanic, compared to just 6% of those not admitted through this programs. how would this work at a national level? private and public universities? the century foundation sponsored r