commissioner and rikki, thank you for your analysis.ant to ask bob costa here in studio with me about the reporting you have gathered on this case. is it all about michael cohen? >> as it not all about michael cohen. after being outside the manhattan criminal court all week, it's clear, based on our conversations with sources, that the district attorney has documents in his possession that would be central to any case he eventually decides to mount, should it move in that direction, that it's not just about michael cohen's testimony. so often we hear about this case and we hear michael cohen's testimony would be the keystone for any sort of prosecution. it would certainly be critical but not the only component. >> do we have any details about what might be in those records? >> to build on rikki's point, we are hearing there are business records, e-mails, financial records, that district attorney has compiled, this is not just about bringing in michael cohen and bob costello, but we wonder who else is going to come in this week. we spoke

cbs news legal analyst rikki klieman joins us now.'s fascinating to me. i'm curious about what you make of the case. on air you have fox hosts saying one thing. behind the scenes, they're saying something very differently. >> what you have is this very high bar that has to be made when there is a defamation case. so what the plaintiffs are saying is that fox was looking for money. fox was looking for viewers. and that's why they did what they did, and they did it knowingly, and it was false. on the other hand, what fox is saying is they're saying it really wasn't the corporation that was doing this. and what was happening was that there may have been some, quote, unquote, commentators who were simply voicing an opinion. now, opinion may be protected under the first amendment, not that it was simply spouting fact. let me give you an easy example. if you say john doe won the election, that is fact. if you say, john doe was the greatest president ever seen, that is opinion. so what fox is saying is dominion is exaggerating and that you h

year, james watson was handed a life sentence with a minimum jail term of 15 years for the murder of rikki4. watson was 13 at the time of the killing. all three appeal judges have now concluded . the 41 year have now concluded. the 41 year old has argued grounds for challenging his conviction. the appeal hearing could be months away . the daily appeal hearing could be months away. the daily mail appeal hearing could be months away . the daily mail says the away. the daily mail says the duke of sussex is privacy claim against them should be rejected in its entirety and has been brought far to the late associated newspaper ltd. says the legal challenges brought by prince harry and other celebrities , including sir elton celebrities, including sir elton john, have no real prospects of success. but the legal team for harry's millions have described the publisher's bid as hopeless and plainly, in a appropriate. prince harry alleges he was the victim of unlawful information gathering . and lastly, the king gathering. and lastly, the king and queen consort have been welcomed with full military ho