director of the roenergo concern atom renat, writhing, he is in direct contact with the studio rinat ivanovich hello, but this information, which inspires fear, will be mildly expressed, because in fact, the situation does not change. and the iaea seems to have been visited, we all know their conclusions, and the conclusions are such that let's make this zone demilitarized. hmm, it would probably be right under certain conditions. and somehow it do question how and actually on the form here is one form to stop shelling to begin with. yes, let's talk to you, please, about the current situation. here. e. what is the situation at the zaporizhia npp now? i have already said that the reactors were shut down. how accurate is this information. maybe these have been launched recently, and why the question is because before that i had. i saw information that we allegedly connected, again, ukrainian networks from the zaes, what is happening? literally one word about demilitarized zone, and already a lot has been said on this topic. uh, in general, it is completely clear what is meant by the definition of a de

advisers to the general director of the concert of the concern rosenergo atom rinat korchan rinat ivanovich hello what does a complete shutdown of a nuclear power plant mean? why was such a decision made? well, formally formal. this decision was associated with neutrality in the framework of nuclear security. the fact is that, of course, because of these artillery strikes that did not stop for a very long time, and for the power supply system of the station was practically put out of action and the sixth. sometimes the block began to work with a serious tension that it trembled. as a matter of fact, about his work and a could lead to their ground disaster. but this is, as it were, a formal side of the issue, because the shutdown of the sixth power unit certainly removes significant participation, and dangers, but by no means all. and once again, uh, which time it can already be stated that without the cessation of artillery shelling. ah, we are not talking about any provision of complete nuclear safety at the zaporizhzhya afghan station rinat ivanovich, what power have those power units that were

concern, rosenergo atom corporation, state corporation rosatom rinat korcha renat ivanovich hello , read the text of the resolution. and what conclusions did you draw? is it possible to say that it is one-sided? but the fact that it is one-sided, uh, is quite obvious. and i would like to pay attention, actually, to something else, but the iaea board of governors, mmm. in my opinion. uh, grossly violated the charter of the organization, uh, and went beyond the limits of his powers, so here, well, part three. uh, the middle article of the third charter, uh, part of uh, absolutely. here i am right i read in the exercise of its functions the agency shall not subject the provision of assistance to its members to any political, economic , military or other requirements inconsistent with the provisions of this statute in this manner. ah, well, here in this, but the text of the resolution, but quite obviously, but is violated. and here is the statute. this is the first moment, the second moment, the iaea is not a political institution, but the statement of such people is exclusively political in

e, rinat ivanovich, hello.l me how you evaluate the published report of the mission of the igt, how it corresponds to the state of affairs in your opinion, and, uh, if it contains real practical proposals for protection. well, hmm, it means that in order to evaluate the report, you need to read it in full, but for now, unfortunately, there was no such possibility, but certain provisions of the report indicate that the inspector is rich, and they saw and heard us. uh, they adequately assessed this degree danger, which is located in the zaporozhye station and one of the main ones. well, putting such as one of the main positive points. i would single out, so, recorded in the report, so, uh, hmm, the need to stop the shelling. both the station itself and its godparents should be kept in mind first of all, when it is, well, i think that is a very, uh, serious, uh, progress forward, which will eventually, uh, build the maximum systemic work to ensure nuclear radiation safety at the station many people point out that

there, uh, rosatom corporation rinat korcha renat ivanovich greetings. hello hello. well , here's the first question. you have already heard in the eyeliner, uh, what does this mean in practical terms? this is the proposal of uh rafael grosse? i'll tell you, frankly, it's completely incomprehensible. what does it mean, in general, as if one of a-a. in my opinion, the serious disadvantages of this report are rich is a complete absence. there are no mechanisms, but on the mechanisms for the implementation of those, in general, in places of good wishes that sounded , you understand how the situation is connected with the fact that it exists and it is clear that in general, how would you find yourself in this kind of situation for the first time. it's not doctors without borders, who endlessly dangle through hot spots, but for them it's all, well, it's anomalous, but in fact everything that happens. i partly explain this, but this kind. well, a few such hmm, these are fantastic, or something, proposals security zones are around the reserves , you know, but, and there are

that is, rinat ivanovich, an adviser to the general director of the concern rosenergota marinad, is currently in touch with the studio. hellomuch can you trust this information, if this is really the text of a draft resolution, how do you evaluate it? well, as for trust, i usually do n’t see documents like that until i see them. i don't trust anything. but yes, there is such information that poland and canada introduced this draft resolution. this means that the iaea board of governors has information that they have chosen as a base, and the recommendation is e raffaello grossy, and this recommendation is enshrined in the report of his creation of a certain security zone around, i.e., the zaporozhye nuclear power plant and , in fact, according to my information. they are trying to enshrine in this draft resolution. unfortunately, oh ah for the actions of the russian federation in relation to nuclear facilities in ukraine. and tell me, why, in your opinion, such a statement addressed to russia was not exactly mentioned at the meeting of the security council, where this issue was raised? well, the question is interesting, but

direct communication, adviser to the general director of the concern rosenergoatom rinat korcha renat ivanovich helloll me how you evaluate the results of the magathen's mission to the zaporizhzhia npp. is there any? understanding? what could be the report on the results of this visit? well, uh, in the beginning, of course, i must note the uh and professionalism of this mission of all its participants and personally mr. grossel, and their courage too, because they tried to break the mission, but they did it deliberately. here they did. it's rather cynical, but still. uh, mr. georgia showed enough integrity and such people arrived with his team. e, for example, it means, therefore, if we talk about the assessment, then the assessment is certainly a positive mission, largely due to the position of the russian federation , and this should also be noted, we took the maximum guarantees, including guarantees security that have been respected, as far as? there our issue in the report to be prepared. now at the moment, of course, it is difficult to say anything about the organization. e is extremely closed,