i would like to point out some rear violations which show skylights without permits, riverview permit, the 14 rear windows and there is actually in phil's on both of the corners of the property, which it wasn't in any of the permits. there's also a things wall, it documents the fence to be 6-foot plus a trellis. this is the existing condition, which under the plans, a first-floor platform was not added to any of the plans. i would like to point out, if you look at these pictures, there is two in phil's that were not added on any other plans and yet they recovered -- they were covered. the wall is not reflecting under the description and the work that the appellant applied for. he applied for a 6-foot fence plus a three-foot trellis, making it an 8-foot wall, which actually requires structural details. on his plan, there is no structural details for it. matter of fact, the wall is only represented on the property line i will also point out that this wall also serves as a guard rail system because there is a 3-inch drop on the other side because of the stairs. i will also point out the