rob joyce. tyler mathisen and rob joyce. pete, are we going to take a look at 2017 and say this was the the year that the cyber stocks are finally, finally making gains >> probably. there's semantic, checkpoint, those kind of names. i would point to the fastest growing section of cisco right now which is in cybersecurity which is over 2 billion, it's going to be 2.3 billion. i think that if you want the pure plays, that's great if you want something where you've got a little something more to it where you're not just reliant on that, that's another reason why cisco is one of these names that trades at too cheap a valuation. they've got growth where you want it, it's like 4%, but it's something that might grow into it >> we might remember that fire eyes touched 100 a share >> it closed 17 1/2 or so, it had a good run semantic over the last six weeks or so, it's gone from 25 to 33, a big move why do i mention it? because valuation-wise, it's probably the cheapest in the space. the margins in the l

we are truly fortunate to have rob joyce in his place. for those of you who don't know rob, rob is the cyberlead at the national security council. he's the so-called cyberczar, the coordinator for all things cyber. he comes to the white house from the national security agency where, among other roles, he ran tao, which i think has gotten a little more notice in recent years, and there was a time we couldn't even mention that. but rob comes to this job with true professionalism. he's worked these issues from a collector and an operator's perspective. and he has a natural ability to translate sort of those ideas into policy and the like. so rob, thank you for doing this, especially at last minute. i thought we'd start with a general question. the executive order that was promulgated in may. i know a lot of homework items were due early september, late august. can you sort of give us a sense of where we stand? and i don't expect you to break all news in terms of what exactly was provided. but tell me where things stand and then in particular

rob joyce who used to run the nsa's hacking says white house is no longer looking for a back door. >> the conversation moved? are we on a different point from where you sit in the white house than we were a year ago? are you asking for a back door >> we are certainly not asking for a back door. what is really important for us is strong encryption is good for america, good for business, good for individuals. it is really important that we have encryption and strong encryption and that is available. the other side of that is there are evil people in this world. and in the end the rule of law needs to proceed and so what we are asking for is for companies to consider how they can support legal needs for information. things that come from a judicial order, how can they be responsive to that if companies consider from the outset of building a platform how they are going to respond to those asks from a judge's order we'll be in a better place. hi, i'm the internet! you know what's difficult? adulting... hi, guys. i'm back. time to slay! no,i have a long time girlfriend. you know what's easy

bossert and rob joyce are still leaning heavily on that work that was done prior to coordinate through some of the malicious activities that have happened over the course of the last nine, ten months or so. so i do feel comfortable in terms of our plans and ability to coordinate on a rapid fashion. other part of your question related to if ukraine happened here. >> specifically the grid. there have been a thousand incidents in the ukraine. >> if there were an attack on our grid. >> the cynical side of me says that we would have been a bit paralyzed, we would have been caught up in the attribution conversation. we would have wanted to have with a very high degree of certainty before we responded to make sure it wasn't some sort of technical failure. so i do believe that we would have been paralyzed, if we're going back to 2015 when ukraine happened. now if it's 2017 and we have seen what happened with the election last year, what else has happened elsewhere, perhaps if it happened in 2017 we might lean a little bit forward. but the 2015 ukraine, i think we would have been unfortunately

just last week rob joyce, the cybersecurity coordinator at the white house, noted that we need to finda way to provide the private sector with more expansive access to cyber threat information in a controlled setting; something i believe we need to strengthen. moreover, issues relating to the sharing of classified information with the privatecces sector, like accrediting scif space, granting security clearances to key personnel, anw enabling consistent two-way communication, are issues we arl looking at closely. in other words, we have made progress in the way indicators are shared but i want to examine if we can do more regarding the overall sharing of classified information. made earlier this year, i was pleased to see president trump issue an executive order to strengthen the cybersecurity of federal networks and critical infrastructure. going forward, i am hopeful thao the house can advance secur legislation that i have introduced to elevate nppd as a standalone agency and better support the cybersecurity mission at dhs. this month is national cybersecurity awareness month, a time

cyber official, white house cyber security rob joyce. many of us know mr. joyce and respect him deeply for his significant experience and expertise on cyber and his many years of service that national security agency. the white house declined to have its cyber kourt nard testify. before congress. while this is consistent with past practice on a bipartisan basis, i believe the issue of cyber requires us to completely rethink our old ways of doing business. to me the empty chair before us represents a fundamental misalignment between authority and accountability in our government when it comes to cyber. all of our witnesses answer to the congress for their part of the cyber mission but none of them is accountable for addressing cyber in its entirety. in theory that is the white house cyber coordinator's job but that nonconfirmable position lacks the full authority to lack cyber policy and strategy and direct our government's efforts and that official is literally prohibited by legal precedent from appearing before the congress. so when we, the elective repres

they invited whies cyber security rob joyce. many of us know mr. joyce and respect him for his experience and expertise on cyber and many years of government service. unfortunately. >> the white house decided to viet live gej after it having before congress. i believe the issue of cyber requires us to completely rethink our old ways of doing business. to me the empty chair before us represents a fundamental misalliance limi misalignment. all of our kwe answered for the their part of the cyber mission. none of them accountable for d add -- addressing in in its entirety. it is to make it and director government's efforts. that official is literally prohibited by legal precedent from appearing before the congress. so when we ask who has sufficient authority to protect and defend our nation from cyber threats and who is accountable the answer is quite literally no one. previous administration struggled between the fbi given that no single agency has all of the authority is required to protect and respond. the model created cig thif cant coop nugs of cy

cyber official, white house cyber security coordinator rob joyce. many of us know him and respect him deeply for his significant experience and expertise on fiber and his many years of government service at the national security agency. unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the white house declined to have the cyber court nader testify, citing executive privilege and precedent against having non- confirmed aniseed staff testifying before congress. while this is consistent with past practice on a bipartisan basis, i believe the issue of cyber requires us to rethink our old ways of doing business or to me, the empty chair before us represents a fundamental misalignment between authority and accountability in our government today when it comes to cyber. all of our witnesses answer to the congress for their part of the cyber mission, but none of them is accountable for addressing cyber in its entirety. in theory, that is the white house cyber coordinator job but that non- confirmable position lacks the full authority to make cyber policy and strategy and

joyce, thanks. senseless. >>> well a delivery driver attacked knot knock unconscious and robbed at a gas station and it's all caught on camera. our jeff cole live in south we have philadelphia with the horrifying story. jeff, this video is hard to watch. >> reporter: clearly it is, chris. the brutality of the attack is shocking. the age of the attackers equally so. but a security camera was rolling their faces clearly scene in those images. >> the wounds on the left side of his face looked painful his inner lip sutured, keith moody says last friday evening is lost to him. >> i don't remember anything from the time i went in tylia came out. i don't remember going there. >> reporter: it's understandable. security camera video from like owl on baltimore avenue in southwest philly captures the brutal strike he took to the head. >> i felt crazy. upset. distraught. >> reporter: it was aft 9:00 friday night the 20th when moody 56 delivering pizza for this local shop pulls into the lukoil. this group of men men ranging from 14 to 25 loitering there wait for him. as moody departs a gun is drawn and then used to smash

cyber official, white house cyber security coordinator rob joyce. many of us know him and respect him deeply for his significant experience and expertise on fiber and his many years of government service at the national security agency. unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the white house declined to have the cyber court nader testify, citing executive privilege and precedent against having non- confirmed aniseed staff testifying before congress. while this is consistent with past practice on a bipartisan basis, i believe the issue of cyber requires us to rethink our old ways of doing business or to me, the empty chair before us represents a fundamental misalignment between authority and accountability in our government today when it comes to cyber. all of our witnesses answer to the congress for their part of the cyber mission, but none of them is accountable for addressing cyber in its entirety. in theory, that is the white house cyber coordinator job but that non- confirmable position lacks the full authority to make cyber policy and strategy and