of the media i have to point out that there is an alarming roberts court cases that suggests the roberts court unlike its benefactors really doesn't believe that media played a special role in our democracy. so most famously there is citizens united that described media corporations as elitist and yielding political power and influence disproportionate to their public support as being answerable to their corporate overlord and saying concretely that they are no more deserving of special protections than any other corporation is. so in other words media corporations and walmart are the same in the roberts court's eye. compound that with justice thomas's skepticism about whether the media need special protections from defamation that he has expressed in saying "the news york times" case should be overturned and it creates an alarming playing field for media actors that might want to litigate cases on the supreme court. the other piece of this is. >> we welcome back to you on this but let's go to ilya for his comments. >> okay. thanks cato for asking me to participate in this. i'm particula

on again, from washington, moderator robert costa. robert: good evening. and welcome to "washington week." 18 days. and here's what i know. my democrati sources say vice president biden's campaign is now working to expand the political map into the deep south and the sunbelt, whispers of a blue wave, they grow louder by the day. inside the g.o.p., my sources are upbeat about judge amy coney barrett's likely confirmation. but republicans are worried about the democrats' hits on health care and about getting pulled into president trump's riptide of grievances. those grievances, however were front and center at this week's dueling town halls. president trump: i denounce white supremacy. what's your next question? i just don't know about qanon. what i do hear about it is they are very strongly again pedophilia and i agree with that. i'm good with masks. i'm ok with masks. and i tell people wear masks. and people with masks are catching it all the time. robert: and here is democratic nominee joe biden. >> we're in a situation where we have 210,000 people dead a

roberts: ¿quiÉn era tu tÍo isaac?o muchos dolores. roberts: arciniega recuerda que no habÍa tiempo para llorar porque tenÍa mucho por hacer. arciniega: mi reacciÓn fue "ok, vamos a hacer los papeles que hay que hacer". yo ya tenÍa organizado el funeral. yo siempre era como esa, ese modo, pues, que yo tenÍa que resolver porque a mÍ nadie me iba a resolver nada. roberts: su madre se habÍa encargado que no le faltara nada, incluyendo un seguro de vida y propiedades, aunque enfrentaba un gran obstÁculo. era demasiado joven para heredar bienes. arciniega: para cosas legales, a los 18 aÑos en nicaragua no se puede. entonces yo me tuve que emancipar, hacer el documento. y yo esa parte ya lo tenÍa listo, pero no tenía todo. me faltaba, por ejemplo, las propiedades. pasarlas mi nombre. roberts: ya con las propiedades a su nombre, podrÍa vivir de la renta y regresar a la universidad para, segÚn ella, intentar retomar su vida. hasta que apareciÓ una amiga de su mamÁ llamada mayela. ella le pidiÓ que se vieran porque tenÍa algo p

and the roberts court has done this for times. in 2010 in united states rs versus stevens, the united states supreme court refused to recognize the unprotected category of images of animal cruelty . in 2011 entertainment merchants association versus brown, us supreme court refused torecognize an exception for so-called violent video games . in 2012 in snyder versus phelps, the us supreme court refused to recognize a new unprotected category for funeral protests by the westboro baptist church and in 2012 as well in united states versus alvarez, the united states supremecourt refused to recognize a new unprotected category for purely false speech . now, turning contacts, contact also matters in first amendment jurisprudence. secondly my contacts on refein acts as an employer, educator , warden orcommander-in-chief . stated another way, if you're a public employee, if you're a public school students, if you're aprisoner or if you are a member of the military , you have less free-speech rightsthan you would in general society . on thi

and the roberts court has done this four times.2010 the united states versus stevens, united states supreme court refused to recognize the unprotected category of images of animal cruelty. in 2011, entertainment merchants association versus brown, the u.s. supreme court fused to recognize an exception for so-called violent video games. in 2012 on snyder versus phelps, the u.s. supreme court, refused to recognize a new unprotected category for funeral protests by the westborough baptist church. and then in 2012 as well united states versus alvarez, the u.s. supreme court t refused to recognize a new unprotected category for purely false speec speech. now turning toe context, context also matters in first amendment jurisprudence. i'm referring to the status of the speaker. it's reality of modern first amendment law that the government has greater power to restrict speech when it acts as educator, warden or commander-in-chief. stated another way, if you are a public employee, if you are a public school student if you are a prisoner or

robert: i'm robert costa. join us for a "washington week" special report. i'm robt costa.ood night from washington. [captioning perforald by the natiaptioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and ac. visit ncicap.org] announcer: corporate funding for "washington week" is proved by -- >> when the world gets complicated, a lot goes through your mind. with fidnaity wealth ment, a dedicated advisor can taylor advice and recommendations to your life. that's fidelity wealth management. >> for 25 years consumer cellular has been offering no contract wiress plans designedo help people do more of what they like. our s.s.-based customevice team can help find a plan that fits you. to learn more, visit consumercellular.tv. robert: announcer: babbel. boeing. additional funding is provide by the estate of arnold adams and koo and patricia yuen through the yuen foundation, commitd to bridging culture -- cultural fferences in our communities, the corporation for public broadcasting and by contribution to your pbs thank you.om viewers like you. ♪ narrator: a kqed tel

of speech and the roberts court has done this four times. in 2010 in united states versus stevens, they refused to recognize the unprotectedd category of images of animal cruelty. in 2011 the association versus brown, u.s. supreme court refused to recognize exception for so-called violent video games. the 2012 the supreme court refused to recognize a new unprotected category for funeral protests by the westborough baptist church and in 2012 as well, united states versus alvarez the supreme court refusedre to recognize a new unprotected category for purely. speech. turning to the context it matters in the first amendment jurisprudence and specifically i refer to the status of the speaker. it's a reality of modern first amendment law that the government has greater power to restrict speech when it acts as an employer, educator, warden or commander-in-chief. stated another way if you are a public employee or public school student, if you are a prisoner or a member of the military, you have less free speech rights than you would in general socie

robert: dr. fauci said on cbs radio that amy coney barrett last week was probably the superspreader event for these white house officials. you are notnly a debate moderator and writing about speaker pelosi and has raised stakes about the 25then amenand whether congress should talk about t fitness of the president to serve. what is she up before the 2020 campaign ends? susan: it's not unreasonable to look at questions of suck ceaseon but it looks -- successon. speaker pelosion -- pelosi said it wasn't directed at trump but indicated it was motivated by trum and has long expressed concerns about the fitness of his office and whether the drugs he is takingo treat covid-19 might be affecting his judgment. i think there is no chanc this bill gets passed in the future but something that hasocused our attention on the president and his fitness and covid-19 and those are bad issues for him three weeks before him. robert: jerry, republicans are expressing alarm and not going to the 25th amendment issue an

once again, from washington, moderator robert costa. robert: good evening. we begin with the crisis that has gripped the nation. president trump is at walter reed national military medical center tonight one day after he and first lady melania trump received positive coronavirus tests. aides have told rorters that the president might remain there for several days and they have said he is not seriously ill. but due to factors facing the 74-year-old president, he decided to step on to marine one tonight and head to the hospital. before going, president issd this statement from the white house. president trump: i want to thank everybody for the tremendous support. i'm going to walter reed hospital. i think i'm doing very well. but we're going to make sure that things work out. the first lady is doing very well. so thank you very much. i appreciate it. i will never forget it. thank you. robert: according to two people close to the president who spoke with the "new york times," the president has a low grade fever, nasal congestion, and a cough. now, this is a sto

robert: i'm robert costa. join us for a "washinon week" special report. i'm robt costa.ood night from washington. [captiong performed by the national captioning institute, which isnsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] announcer: corporate funding for "washington week" is provided by -- >>n whee world gets complicated, a lot goes through your mind. with fidelity wealth management, a dedicated advisor can taylor advice anda recommenons to your life. that's fidelity wealth management. on for 25 years csumer cellular has been offering no contract wireless plans designed to help people do more of wt they like. r u.s.-based customer service team can help find a plan that fits you. to learn more, visit consumercellular.tv. robert: announcer: babbel. boeing. additional funding is provided by the estate of arnold adams riand koo and pata yuen through the yuen foundation, committed to bridging culture -- cultural differences in our communities, the corporation for public broadcasting and by t bution to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. at

i'mst robert a, see you soon. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and acicracy. visit .org] >> corpote funding for "washington week" is provided by -- >> when the wld gets compcated, a lot goes through your mind. an a can tailor alth managements recommendations to your life. that's management. >> babbel. consumer cellur. boeing.al additi funding is provided by the estate of arnold adams and coo and patricia yuen through the yuen foundation, committed to bridging cultural difference -our communities. the corporation for public oadcasting. and contrutions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. robert: inside, battle ground pennsylvania. with the voters who could decide it all. will president trump stun the political world once again, or will vice president biden win the state and the white house? the pandemic, of course is a key issue. >> it was political for our ro president the very beginning. robert: but so are debates on rights a

robert: those would be economic penalties? larry: perhaps. robert: any details, larry? larry: not at the moment, bob, sorry. this is deep national security stuff. i'm not going to reveal that now. these decisions will be up to the president, of course, and the national security council. we are working on a number of options. the china is very much on our mind. secretary from tail -- on our minds. secretary pompeo has been a great leader on this. more will be forthcoming, but not at the moment. robert: really appreciate your time this afternoon, larry kudlow. thank you. larry: thank you, appreciated. robert: thank you all for joining us today for another washington post conversation. don't miss our election daily show every day monday through friday at 1:00 p.m. eastern now through next week, to go over the latest headlines, talk to reporters, then on newsmakers on friday, i will be joined by peter navarro, who works along larry kudlow in the white house, representative, lisa blunt rochester, at 1:00 p.m. eastern on friday right here. at 3:00 p.m., my colleague, robin gi

robert: what about bernie sanders? you've covered sanders for years, i noticed harris has been campaigning with him. ll the sanders voters going to come out? yamie: based on my reporting, sanders voters see bid someone they can support unlike hillary clinton. there were people that never got on board with hillary clintovepble i'm not seeing thsa feeling when i talk to former sanders supporters. i was in miami talking to a young black man. he said, i'm voting foroe biden, he's not my first pick, i'm not enthusitic, i was hoping sanders would go in there, i hepped the democratic party would go more the a.o.c. wing. the voters see president trump as an exiss ten rbleth threat, see him as a threat to democracy and to their daily in lives when you about not only their live bus also policed killings criminal us justice in this country my feeling is progressives are more. energiz the question is can joe biden run up the numbers enough so the coalition he buildshi will likely be different than the coalition of hillary clinton

coons: in this article three years ago, you chastised justice roberts for not being a textual list. you say he has not proven himself to be a textual is and has been willing to depart from essentially clear text. i'm quoting you -- it is illegitimate for the court to distort the constitution or a statute to achieve what it deems a preferable result. this was the sort of outcomes-oriented judicial crafting that has been sharply criticized by your mentor when criticizing the living constitutionalist and as i read this, you are saying to chief justice roberts, you are no textual list, you have overreached, you have delivered an implausible conclusion and frankly, i disagree with your upholding the constitutionality of the statute. that seems to me, as a textual list, a plain reading of your own writing. judge barrett: i want to make very clear -- i think this came up with senator klobuchar, i was not attacking or chastising chief justice roberts at all, for whom i have the greatest respect. i think the passages you are talking about in this book was maybe a couple of paragraphs or mayb

you know robert i am so glad you brought up the commerce issue because it seems to me. as the republicans and the democrats you know they fight these cultural wars so many of these judges you know go under the wire you know under the radar and so much of what they actually do has to do with commerce and with the economy but again the way the media projects the court it's about gay rights it's about abortion rights but there's a whole lot more to it ok and i think that you know we like with calvin i have no idea what he thinks about those things because all they talked about was his yearbook ok and we'll see what they do with amy ok i mean this energy from hawaii had a very bizarre question of the judge i'm not to repeat it here because i thought it was so disgusting but you know there are they disagree more does a whole lot of things but the way it's betrayed in the media you wouldn't think so what do you think. well as to abortion and as you know the whole question is moot. beyond the initial polls favoring woman's right to choose when you have these visual moments whe

justice roberts: mr. goldstein, would you like to take a minute to wrap up? mr. goldstein: i want to address the argument that it is sufficient that google could write new declarations that would require developers to learn new instructions and that we are effectively stealing this efficient way of doing it. the soul of the oracle rule would be to make the creation of innovative computer programs less efficient, that would turn the copyright act on its head. the declaration so lacked creativity that they deserve the least copyright protection. there is no practical or textual basis for that theory. -- by claiming the exclusive right to the declaration's function, oracle is asserting a patent right to insulate itself from competition. textually, section 102(b) provides that copyright does not extend to a method of operation embodied in java se. there is no exception for the methods for which there are possible substitutes. saying that the developers could use different commands is another way of saying the

his name robert mercer. he is co c.e.o. of a hedge fund firm renaissance technologies whose ranks he's been climbing since 1993 . carol cadwallader has been investigating this computer engineer turned billionaire robot. he is an absolutely brilliant scientist. really pioneering b.n. in the sixty's. and in the field of natural language processing which is the base of ai basically and he was there right at the start of it and working out how to do my machine translation between languages so that google translates which we use all the time that is a descendent of the work that he did you know he is without a doubt one of the brilliant computer engineers of his generation and he was just an ordinary middle class god i am doing a professional job and he got an offer from renascence technologies this hedge fund to go with them and he did. and it was in the early ninety's that robert mercer left i.b.m. to work for run a song technologies. there he applied his methods of calculation on the stock exchange in order to predict its flu

>> chief justice roberts. >> i'm not sure chief justice roberts has ever identified himself as a contextual us. >> in this article you chastised chief justice roberts for not being a textualist. he said he's not proven himself to be a textualist has been willing to depart from extensively clear text. you said in his article it's illegitimate for the court to distort either the constitution or the statutes to achieve what it deems a preferable result. this was the sort of outcomes oriented judicial crafting is often been sharply criticized by your mentor, justice scalia, one sizing the living constitution. as i reread this, you're saying to chief justice roberts you are no textualist. you have overreached. you have delivered in a possible conclusion and frankly i disagree with your upholding the constitutionality of this statute. that seems to me, as a textualist, a plain reading of your own writing. >> senator coons, i want to make very, very clear. i think this maybe claim up with senator klobuchar, that i was not attacking or chastising chief justice roberts at all for whom i have the gre

robert: how has he weaponized it? for doing: coming out things that are consistent with the president best political interest, whether it's interfering in cases that put supporters of the president at risk with regard to manafort, stone, people like that. with regard to the way in which they have taken position in election cases, there's a whole variety of ways this attorney general has put the justice department on the side of the president as opposed to the people. friend and longtime ally, president obama, was in florida earlier this week. where do you believe he should go in the final few days of this campaign? mr. holder: first of all, i think he's getting a few things off his chest, so that was interesting to watch. i think he's going to go to the places he needs to be. certainly florida, i think the industrial midwest is a place that will require some attention toward the end of the election process. i think democrats are still suffering ptsd from what happened in 2016 and do not want to repeat what is perceive

>> and chief jus roberts. >> i'm not sure that chief justice roberts has ever involved himself as a text textualist. >> you chastised him for not being a textualist and willing to depart from clear text and so you said in this article and i'm quoting you, it is illegitimate for the court to distort either the constitution or a statute to achieve what it deems a preferable result. so this was the sort of outcomes oriented judicial crafting that has often been sharplybeen shar si sizeded by your mentor justice scalia. and as i read this, you are saying to chief justice roberts, you're no textualist, you have overreached, delivered an implausible conclusion an i disagree with your upholding the constitutionality of the statute. that seems a plain reading of your own writing. >> i want to make very clear, i think maybe this came up with senator klobuchar i was not attacking or, you know, chastising chief justice roberts at all for whom i have the greatest respect. i think the passage you're talking about in this book review on constitutional commentary was maybe a couple of paragraphs, maybe

roberts: aunque hay quienes piensan lo contrario.rega donde uno puede ir a dejarla o mandarla por correo, o sea, no es peligroso, especialmente ahora en estos tiempos de la pandemia. es lo mÁs seguro para hacerlo. roberts: un fallo de la corte suprema de justicia en 2013 permitiÓ que los estados cambiaran leyes electorales sin permiso del gobierno federal. los crÍticos de esta decisiÓn aseguran que los estados republicanos han modificado las votaciones para suprimir el voto de las minorÍas. y citan a georgia como un ejemplo. en georgia han cambiado los requisitos de los registros para votar y han disminuido los dÍas de votaciÓn temprana. tambiÉn han reducido el nÚmero de centros de votaciÓn en condados donde viven mayormente minorÍas. la ley llamada "nombre exacto" impidiÓ el registro de mÁs de 50 mil votantes. por ejemplo, si el nombre del votante es marÍa del rosario, pero en el registro aparece como marÍa delrosario, no les permiten votar. la mayorÍa de los afectados son minorÍas. mientras tanto, en florida, esteves cree que es ho

[habla en inglÉs] roberts: mientras el presidente reposa.en la constituciÓn. acÁ no hay una ley del congreso que puede postergar las elecciones. entonces, ¿quÉ hace el paÍs en un contexto con un presidente enfermo, con un partido que no puede nombrar su reemplazo? supongo que sÍ, pero ¿quÉ hacemos con los que han votado? roberts: Él dice que mientras unos se concentran en el futuro, otros estÁn ya revisando el pasado inmediato. gamarra: creo que la historia va a ser muy dura con el presidente trump. porque Él tenÍa la responsabilidad de ser mÁs cuidadoso que cualquier ciudadano en este paÍs para prevenir que esa enfermedad ingresara a la casa blanca. janiot: y por estos dÍas polÍticos y estrategas hacen cÁlculos sobre cÓmo la salud del presidente impactarÁ a la campaÑa presidencial. en muchos estados que estÁn reabriendo sus economÍas y sus escuelas, familias, trabajadores y estudiantes, se preguntan ¿cuÁles serán las consecuencias de la segunda ola de la pandemia? ya volvemos con mÁs de "aquÍ y ahora". locutor: mÁs adelante. reporte especia

robert: i will speak for myself on that.buying still a substantial amount of bonds every month. treasuries and mortgage backed securities. i think we could say more about what our plans are going forward, but my own view is i, right now, would be hesitant to see us doing more in that area because i do not see the benefits. i can see how it would further add fuel to the financial markets had i am more skeptical how much it would help the real economy. kathleen: i got to ask you a question that struck me coming out of the minutes because the minutes said the new outcome based forward guidance is not an unconditional commitment to a particular pass. i thought you guys just said -- you said the fed will not be moving rates until inflation is at 2% and moving higher and your maximum employment. now it sounds act there is some flex ability there. was this a compromise that had to be reached for you guys to have a new forward guidance? it seems vague and not clear even though you said recently there's plenty of clarity on this new

they claimed her critique of chief justice roberts' reasoning in the 2012 a.c.a. case dictates how she would vote in some upcoming case. so they obviously didn't listen to her when she had no preconceived notions about any case and made no promises to anybody. so the democrats even pushed the storyline that judge barrett signaled to president trump that she'd support invalidating the a.c.a. if she were confirmed to the supreme court. that is nonsense. judge barrett made clear that she doesn't have an agenda. she testified, quote, i have no who's tilt to the -- hostility to the a.c.a. legal scholars critique court decisions all the time and even when they don't disagree with the outcome. for instance, ruth bader ginsburg criticized the court's reasoning in roe v. wade, but no one claims that ginsburg didn't support the outcome of roe v. wade. judge barrett's critique then of roberts' reasoning was shared by many legal commentators across the political spectrum, including ones on the other side of the aisle. even president obama rejected the notion that the affordab

as i read this, you are saying to chief justice roberts, you're no texturalist. you have overreached, you have reached an implausible conclusion and i disagree with you upholding this. that seems to me a plain reading of your own writing. >> senator combs, i want to make very, very clear, i think this came up with senator klobuchar, that i was not attacking or chastising chief justice roberts at all for whom i have the greatest respect. i think this that you're talking about in this book of commentary was maybe a couple paragraphs, maybe one paragraph at the end because it was a comment on robert barnett's book and a lot of his book dealt with the nfb versus sebelius, for example, so i was responding to that. and the sentence you read about it's illegitimate for a court to twist language in pursuit of a policy goal, i don't think it is the job of courts to pursue policy goals that the text you enact doesn't support. >> so to be clear, you're specifically accusing the chief justice, or you're chastising, might be a better word, the chief justice of distorting the

good morning good morning robert how you doing and. how was your shift it was great ok yeah easy money man you know basically robert you have your whole life inside that van yeah i've been living in my van for 6 years now. working seasonal work for amazon and i've done some also i've worked a job in alaska salmon cannery have worked and beat harvest and. amazon's been really good to me and it's really easy money and allows me the freedom to do what i want to. like many were campers and robert barker lives a modest life with few frills his kitchen an outdoor microwave and a picnic table. kind of go in time here i may think i'm. not even curry right. robards lifestyle saves him $2000.00 a month he says money he uses later to travel robert is $46.00 he has no partner no children and very few expenses. amazon pace's camps health insurance and $15.00 an hour when he works managing customer returns it's a temporary contract for a couple of months. the key to doing it right is you can't have. $400.00 car paid in or or you know in. debt. and d

so robert as a longtime critic of the u.s. government's and big pharma is vaccination programs what do you feel people should be on the lookout for as more 'd and more news comes in hyping possible breakthrough treatments and vaccines or cures for covert 19. i'm sure you know the most likely. route out of the pandemic and come from x. and m i think vaccines are they. are the route of treatment for the pharmaceutical let's say because $18000000000.00 enterprise. object challenged she has arranged essentially almost $20000000000.00 maxine and it is only one point or $6000000.00 to annie birol isn't off the shelf repurposed drugs and i think that that is where doctors who are frontline doctors who are really you know doing the work treating these patients are fighting really you know encouraging success stories it's not a surprise to anybody. and watching this process that ram doesn't share fell on its face of the earth is another one of tony allergies kind of vanity projects and he tried it out and eat it fell a bit in his lap o

former obama press secretary robert gibbs joins me. you're watching a special edition of "andrea mitchell reports" live from philadelphia only on msnbc. ♪ but i like it, i love it, i want some more of it ♪ ♪ i try so hard, i can't rise above it ♪ ♪ don't know what it is ♪ ♪ get a dozen double crunch shrimp for one dollar with any steak entrée. only at applebee's. iphone 12 and iphone 12 pro are here on verizon 5g with (announcer)ntrée. 5g just got real. with the coverage of 5g nationwide, and, in more and more cities, the performance of 5g ultra wideband. get iphone 12 on us when you switch. only on verizon. car vending machines and buying a car 100% online.vented now we've created a brand new way for you to sell your car. whether it's a year old or a few years old, we want to buy your car. so go to carvana and enter your license plate, answer a few questions, and our techno-wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds. when you're ready, we'll come to you, pay you on the spot, and pick up your car. that's

>> robert was a long-haul truck driver which explains his absence. >> we had to find robert and checkgps. >> that takes a while, right? >> yes, sir. >> detectives spread out through the neighborhood knocking on doors. >> a couple of neighbors said they saw a red car in the neighborhood that afternoon. a car they had not seen before. a black car too. they asked the girls who could have been there? >> did your mom have any other friends. >> men. the only one i would hear her talk about was joe. >> joe? who was joe? >> we were told nikki had a second boyfriend, joe carter. >> two boyfriends. >> time to dig a little deeper into the life of nikki whitehead. >> coming up, was there bad blood involved. >> they had an argument. he was an immediate person of interest. dateline continues. >> detectives in conyers, georgia were getting a look inside the life of nikki whitehead who lived with her live-in boyfriend and twin daughters. >> they would put their arms around each other. it is going to be okay. we'll find out who did this. they were clearly relying on each other. >> they were able to co

judge appointee, john roberts, on 0bamacare.", 18 months later, you criticise the chief justice months later, you criticise the chiefjustice for months later, you criticise the chief justice for upholding the affordable care act when you concluded "chiefjustice roberts push the affordable ca re roberts push the affordable care act beyond its possible meaning to save the statute." my meaning to save the statute." my question is, how many months after you publish that article did donald trump nominate you to bea did donald trump nominate you to be a judge on the court of appeals? senator harris, i apologise, i don't member the timing of that on the mike article, i believe my nomination to the court of appeals was announced in may of 2017. that's correct. but i don't member when the article came out. the article was published in january came out. the article was published injanuary of came out. the article was published in january of 27 came out. the article was published injanuary of 27 —— january 2017, five months later. justice g

robert: exactly.ays, what it is all about, it is running a gigantic fiscal deficit and making absolutely sure that you meet the gap in earnings shortfall. and in the u.s., we have been doing that. stimulus falls short, we will be the two countries that let's not following earlier. i think the markets are displeased with that. gap.nk there will be a we are seeing a gap in the sense that we are at record retail sales. the markets i think are shocked at how strong housing has been, how strong autos have been so fearare us is, ending that of an income drop off and a double-dip in the u.s. because results have been so strong. but i think the risk in there that as stimulus drops off, you in retail sales from the u.s. and you may see it in other countries. so we are in an ironic place where the huge fiscal is a positive for the markets, even if it is reckless. when it falls away, it could be a big disappointment. lisa: can you build on that in strategy, theding idea that people could be disappointed with mom