andre belanger thank you. john g. roberts, jr. justice kagan. elena kagan mr. belanger, as you know, i thought that apodaca was a precedent, so you would have a very steep climb to get me to think that ramos was anything other than a new rule. o i want to focus on the watershed inquiry, and in that inquiry, we've talked a lot about accuracy. nd i think somebody previously asked you about your empirical evidence, and i'll just give you sort of my sense that the mpirics here are sparse, maybe surprisingly sparse, as to how this unanimity requirement works with respect to what i take to be the ordinary meaning of "accuracy," which is simply a reduction in the error rate in trials. and -- and so too it eems like one's intuition is not necessarily in your corner, that it might be that the unanimity rule allows more guilty people to go free than it -- than it stops innocent people from being convicted, or at east it's just not certain. so i -- i guess what i -- i'd like to ask you is whether your -- well, i mean, number one, do you just contest all of everything that