so robert barnes and i were both attorneys buy training. robert is still a practicing attorney and we devised basically the, the terms of service, the guidelines for how they're gonna you know, regulate content. and the most important thing is not having opaque rules that are politically weaponized to suppress ideological adversaries. what the problem was when you choose rules, it's not that they don't have any is that there's so opaque or they can be weaponized one way or the other. someone says one word and it does or a sense to ship someone else has the exact same word and it deserves amplification . so we've, we've, we've devised these, you know, terms which say, if it's a legal, it's not going to be censored, you know, above and beyond what is over harassment, what it is not what is not lawful in the 1st place. and more importantly than anything, transparency. so there might be issues where people say, you know, you've, you've, you've took off a video for an x. why is that reason we should? we think it's a violation of free speech. what