this map was created by robert clinton who was not able to join us today. as you can see, the southeast sector where, south market and tenderloin, these are our hard to count areas with the lowest response rate. the bottom line is, in san francisco we have so many hard to count people, over 25% of our population might be considered hard to count. they are spread out all over the city, in almost every neighborhood and district. you can't just go to one area. they are everywhere. here is the challenge. if everyone is hard to count in san francisco, how are we ever going to get the job done. -- job done? we have to make sure every san francisco resident is included, and formed accurately county. accurately counted. while april 1 as the official census data. the efforts actually started in early 2018 with the census bureau's local address verification operation. in other words they have master list of addresses in san francisco and that is how you get your census notification and your pin number to go online. so the question must be finalized and we will all st

so why didn't the highly consistenconflicted robert muelr investigate how and why hillary clinton deleted and acid washed. mails. she must have great lawyers,

2016 data dump very favorable to his campaign but not so much the democratic nominee hillary clinton robert muller saying there of the fact that praise the data dump of wiki leaks he said problematic is an understatement it's giving booze to what should be illegal activity expect you'll hear that sound bite being played over and over again but certainly republicans feel that they have also scored a victory in all of this given the fact that what had typically been kind of thought of as conspiracy theory in terms of the origins of this. investigation will now that's come out to the public realm through their questions that they asked although they were not getting the answers they were looking for. from robert muller but essentially that this was office mission research that so-called steel dossier just the fact that they had robert muller talking about this even if he would not confirm that that was in fact the origins of the investigation certainly now puts this into the public realm something that the republicans have been trying to do for a very long time. and of course the murder invest

so way before bill clinton, robert smith talked about the convergence of clinton, jimmy carter abandonede black community. jimmy carter, with the nobel prize, did not love black folks while he was president. so the convergence between republican racism and democratic party racism started in the 1960's and 1970's. we only have this idea of a moral, reparative black citizenship that there was a consensus around for several years, because of the crises occurring in the 1960's. i would argue maybe 1963 to 1968. one of the great tragedies of that time is the assassination of martin luther king jr., because as long as martin luther king jr. was alive, you had a symbol globally who was recognized as a symbol of that claim of moral, reparative black citizenship. so what is interesting when we think about civil rights and black power and black history, is that walters recognizes the 1970's that american politics has shifted toward neoliberalism. the rhetoric of jimmy carter is the rhetoric of bill clinton, and ron walters argues there is a strain of that rhetoric that continues in barack obama, a

why didn't robert mueller and his band of 18 angry democrats spend any time investigating crooked hillary clinton, lying and leaking james comey, lisa page and peter strzok, an di any mccabe and many others, including himself and andrew w.

2016 data dump very favorable to his campaign but not so much to the democratic nominee hillary clinton robertmuller saying there the fact that praise the data dump of wiki leaks he said problematic is an understatement it's giving booze to what should be illegal activity. well donald trump has given his response to the hearings saying the investigation was a witch hunt from the beginning there was no defense to this ridiculous hoax this witch hunt that's been going on for. a long time pretty much from the time i came down on the escalator with the 1st lady. and. it's a disgrace what happened but i think that they proved a lot to everybody in fact some of my biggest opponents wrote things today that i wouldn't believe they would have written i appreciate that they did that this is been a very bad thing for our country. well today hofmeister joins us now from the university of dayton school of law in cincinnati thank you for speaking to us on the news hour so these will obviously much anticipated hearings what did you make of robert list of formants before congress today well he definitely look

2016 data dump very favorable to his campaign but not so much to the democratic nominee hillary clinton robert muller saying there of the fact that prays that data dump of wiki leaks he said problematic is an understatement it's giving booze to what should be illegal activity. meanwhile here in the u.k. boris johnson has taken over as the country's prime minister is but to get a bold new threats that deal but warn that person will crash out by the end of october if the e.u. refuses to negotiate johnson is now building his new cabinet appointing hardline breaks it is to keep positions several ministers have resigned since he was chosen as leader on the conservative party. or johnson's predecessor to reason may has left downing street after being forced to resign because of her own failure to get parliament to back up rights that deal may's one of britain's shortest serving prime ministers in the last 100 years she outran just 6 of the $22.00 prime ministers since the start of the last century and it sudan's military says it's for today could attempt seeking to abort the people's revolution and

what were talking about what created robert mueller was the effort of hillary clinton to three firewalls, the d&c perkin going and gps to hire a foreign national to hire other foreign nationals to work the u.s. election. that is what it's all about. there was never anything else. this was all a front or an effort of a group of lawyers that we're partisan to use robert mueller to shy away from this reality. this reality in the next 14 months is going to come drip, drip, drip, and the investigators will be investigated and the optics wil be reversed. i think that explains this year terror on the look of the democrats for they couldn't believe robert mueller. >>laura: any type of sedative or antidepressants, pharmaceutical companies we're smiling today. i have to ask you a question that i raised earlier, victor about this build up of people. you and i have talked about thi before. the elites protect each other, so being in elite means never having to say you're sorry when you're wrong. if you're a part of the republican establishment you don't have to apologize for it if you're greenspan an

andrew weissmann who we learn today responsible for hiring all the clinton donors, even clinton's attorney for robertueller. you are going to do that? >> i'm going to let borowitz do his job to tell us what happened with the fisa warrant process. i'm going to explain to the american people that everybody was investigating trump hated his guts and like clinton. i'm going to help tell that story, but i'm not going to do anything until horwitz issues his report. we will try to lay out the facts of the case and in the future if you apply for a fisa warrant you have to tell the court, by the way, the chief informed here the person they are looking at, it's not verified. so i will do that, here's what i want you to understand. the democratic party is imploding, the immigration policies are no more criminal law liability, you do not get fe health care, that's insane. >> sean: i've been down to the border 14 times. >> we're going to the border tomorrow. >> sean: will update everybody. next. when we come back, really disturbing details about the jeffrey epstein case are beginning to trickle out. jonathan hunt

. >> i heard chelsea clinton was one of researchers on robert mueller team. >> probably. >> here so. >> here -- wait. >> you are attackings prosecutor. kennedy: i can't hear what you are saying, you are both talking. >> really quick. >> you are not attacking evidence. >> im, the special count speciay 10-year-old knows that a special counsel condition can't -- can't indict, but they can prove a crime of committed, robert mueller could not do that because there was no crime. kennedy: do you know what we it today, i have been reobsessed with oj trial for years, we needed a johnny cochran the glove don't fit moment, we did not get that. >> yes, but there is -- donald trump hampered a federal investigation. >> he didn't. >> republicans still deny the -- excuse me, denying fact that russia engaged in this elect. kennedy: i am so glad you brought that up, i am talking about it later in my memo, guess what joe biden, look at your watch. >> right. kennedy: there is russia stingy biz ale ove all over it. >> thank you, richard and ned. >> thank you. kennedy: virginia congressman ben klein quest

>> "why didn't robert mueller & his band of 18 ang democrats spend any time investigating crooked hillary clintonleakin' james comey, lisa page and her psycho lover, peter -- andy mccabe, the beautiful g ohr family, fusion, and many more, including himself & andrew w?" "so why didn't the hhly conflicted robert mueller investigate how and why crooked hillary clinton deleted and acid washed 33,000 emails immediately after getting a subpoena from the united states congress she must have great lawyers! >> "no collusion, no obstruction! u.s. history, by far!" hunt in >> seth: dear god, his tweets would make more sense if they pe were scribbled on paand faxed to a newspaper under the zodiac symbol.ht [ laug ] but at the very least, today's hearings might have been informative, both for trump and for members of congress who've admitted they didn't read the whole report more than a dozen members of congress readily admitted to politico that they too have ar skipped nd rather than studying every one of the special counsel report's 448 pages. that might explain why some democrats have spent the last few mo

i'm joined by former clinton labor secretary robert reisch, author of "the common good."ys congress has a constitutional duty to impeach this president. thanks for joining me. >> well, ari, you know, there is a constitutional dite to begin an impeachment inquiry. there's no question that this man donald trump is not going to be impeached in terms of removed from office because of the senate republicans. so i think that when and if democrats actually begin there impeachment inquiry, the public ought to be very, very clear that it is for the purpose of exploring and revealing and the public understanding everything that was in the mueller report and more. >> and so you have been around these washington crises before. the clinton administration dealt with its own investigation that went to, as you say, a somewhat similar outcome, right. >> what you were talking about if it happened would be the house and senate not necessarily agreeing. when you look to bob mueller, i know you know about, what do you expect him to say next week and do you think it can move the needle in a wo

robert mueller has such credibility. that's what we were told. yes, he had hired 13 democrats and no republicans to run this investigation. those democrats were close allies of hillary clintonn some cases lawyers for her. you can it criticize, because robert mueller who was a nominal republican was beyond reproach. what we learned today was that robert mueller is not very familiar with the investigation that he was the figurehead of. the entire question of russian collusion, we were told for years that donald trump was a traitor. then, we were told that he got upset about being called a traitor, and that might be obstruction. i don't think that case was well made today. people keep trying to keep us from asking questions, but i think now more than ever, people need to know how this special was dominic counsel was set up. how did the russian hoax began? these are questions that robert mueller was unable and unwilling to answer today, but people will need those answers. >> tucker: the fact that he made baseless allegations against russia, and i know, having been accused of being a handmaiden to vladimir putin, maybe i shouldn't say this. but there is something inferior rating

spinning the investigation forward, a political opposition research document funded by the clinton campaign. i expect roberton that, even though it predated his taking over the investigation. also on the question of bias. >> you think there comes a point where mueller may feel inclined to defend the work of his investigative team, when he is under fire from republican lawmakers resting the legitimacy of the entire russian investigation? >> i think he will. he is a former fbi director himself and loves the institution. as republicans are attacking the institution, i think he will feel pressed to defend the bureau and his team. >> all right, we have to leave the conversation there. we appreciate you coming on. that is matt, national security reporter with the washington post. we will see how it plays out tomorrow. to for your time. >> thank you. >> we will have live coverage from the testimony starting at 5:30 tomorrow morning. we will air the hearings on ktvu plus and streaming on ktvu.com. we will also give you live updates on the testimony during mornings on 2, right here on ktvu. >>> puerto rico's departm

hillary clinton's mentor, her mentor, robert byrd,en used to e in the ku klux klan. al gore's father tried to block the 1954 civil rights act, the historic legislation. lyndon johnson relied on republican support to get it passed. the democrats went through with a filibuster. the list goes on. we don't even have time to list all of the creepy, crazy, sleepy uncle joe's racist remarks and policies over the years. and let's talk about charges of sexual misconduct. again, selective.rs feigned moral outrage. only when it is a republican or donald trump or donald trump supporter or donald trump appointee. remember that the "i believers" in the kavanaugh hearings, they are nowhere to be found when a democrat is accused of wrongdoing.he case in point, the governor of virginia who gayle king interviewed, two women, one accused of a rape and other violent sexual assault, both telling people at the time that he is still in office and i have not heard a word from one of the "i-believers." keith ellison got a promotion. bill clinton serving twoha terms as president. what about t

robert mueller is calling the shots even though he is a subpoenaed witness. aaron zebley will be there at the witness stand with director mueller. i remember when secretary clintonestified, she testified for 10 hours, counsel said the hunter, you have -- sat behind her, you have a witness, but with robert mueller and jerry nadler, you have specialty. >> democrats tell me he is just going to say what is in the report. is, he is ato that subpoenaed witness, i am asking questions, if you will not answer them, unless you have a privilege, you are in contempt. >> good point. i will have plenty of questions and we hope he does answer and he answers and not deferring or his -- i do not know if you call him counsel, it is a strange situation. hopefully it is bob mueller answer questions. >> it should be mueller. host: republican lawmakers from yesterday discussing what they would ask robert mueller today. packed hallway with the media, public, staffers, security outside the house judiciary committee room where robert mueller will sit in the witness , racistd take the oath right hand and swear to tell the truth before these lawmakers at a: 30 a.m. eastern -- 8:30 eastern

robert rubin. that is the most shocking thing that the democrat elite keep on going to this guy bill clinton barack obama and now by it and if he were to be president would use robert rubin robert rubin is very responsible for that repeal of glass steagall and you can talk about that moment because you had to know glass steagall and he also introduced the commodity futures modernization act in 2000 so let go of the so what did those 2 acts together the repeal of the glass steagall act in the introduction the commodities futures modernization act do to create the problems that need changing and solutions well robert rubin is a financial engineer and we live in an era post drop of the gold standard in the $171.00 financial engineering was back in the currency more than something like gold and those who can successfully financially engineer became hugely powerful at goldman sachs and other wall street banks and robert rubin is a very successful financial engineer if they were able for example to print lots of money but engineer it so that it never went to workers they did this by bringing china in at

robert rubin. that is the most shocking thing that the democrat elite keep on going to this guy bill clinton barack obama and now by it and if he were to be president would use robert rubin robert rubin is very responsible for that repeal of glass steagall and you can talk about that a moment because he had to know glass steagall and he also introduced the commodity futures modernization act in 2000 so let go i was so what did those 2 acts together the repeal of the glass steagall act in the introduction the commodities futures modernization act do to create the problems that need changing and solutions well robert rubin is a financial engineer and we live in an era post drop of the gold standard in the $171.00 financial engineering was back in the currency more than something like gold and those who can successfully financially engineer became hugely powerful at goldman sachs and other wall street banks and robert rubin is a very successful financial engineer if they were able for example to print lots of money but engineer it so that it never went to workers they did this by bringing china in at

. >> james comey testified two days after announcing the decision on hillary clinton back in 2016. robert mueller, let's see, the mueller report got submitted some time in the spring. we've changed seasons since. it has now took almost essentially four months. obviously you wish it had been sooner. could you have done more to make this happen sooner and was it a mistake to let it happen this long? >> i'm not sure what more we could have done. bill barr withhold the mueller report as long as he could. he wanted the narrative baked in as long as possible. this is the same reason why it took so long to get bob mueller, don mcgahn and other witnesses. the mueller report the american people have to recognize, the mueller report is not the evidence. it is a summary of the evidence. maybe i'm just an old prosecutor, but i'd like to see the evidence. i'd like to hear from the witnesses before we make a decision about charging the president. and so i think where we are is probably most accurately described as preliminary to a judicial proceeding, that proceeding being a potential impeachment. but

president trump tweeting out earlier this didn't saying that wide special counsel robert mueller investigate hillary clintonndicate an administration of chaos as she put it in a memo she distributed within her democratic caucus. this is the first time many americans will be hearing from special counsel mueller following his 22 month investigation. now is up to everything he has to say or does not say. david: we are seeing robert mueller sitting down. first we will hear from the chair of the house judiciary committee, jerry nadler new york , then we will hear from mr. collins from new data from georgia, and then we will have robert mueller's opening remarks. how much is nancy pelosi trying to avoid the i-word. kevin: the impeachment word is something she can now not avoid. the fact that 90 members of the democratic caucus have called for impeachment, some with mueller, some with president trump's fiery rhetoric in the past week. the question for speaker closing is it any of the development for special counsel bob mueller would yield any information that would embolden those calls for impeachment. special cou

clinton. i appreciated that. >> reporter: robert mueller said he did not exonerate the president. he specifically said that. >> do you understand the role of a prosecutor? in this case, the special counsel? the role is to refer an indictment or decline. only for donald trump is there a new standard that we're guilty unless proven innocent. the standard in this country is innocent until proven guilty. not that this was a criminal exercise, but boy, did it sound that way. i think yesterday nobody is going to confuse a political exercise with a legal exercise. this was clearly a political stunt by people using and abusing director mueller and trying to imbue a flawed investigation, and no juice for impeachment trying to imbue all the efforts bob mueller's integrity and reputation. i think that's a shame. i saw somebody who did not want to be used and abused by people. i saw somebody who it's not clear to me was in charge of his own investigation for most of it. i also saw someone who -- i read the polls that very few americans say they've read the mueller report. i'd like to know if

robert. once an actual member of the clan. hillary clinton has referred to him as her mentor. you might remember this. >> i've seen a lot of white blank in my time. we all just need to work together to make our country a better country. >> sean: all of what we've shown you is being routinely ignored by the media mob. it happens day in and day out. what used to be every two and four years is not every day. take a look. >> what the leader of the republican party and this congress are doing and blocking an accurate census, because they don't want to count everyone that they don't think they can count on. they are in favor of affirmative action. if you can dunk the basketball or sank a three-point shot. they're not in favor of it if you nearly have the potential to be a leader in your community. don't, we've got a color-blind society. >> sean: george bush supported the death penalty for the eve or there's a lot of phony hypocritical outrage on the left. this is the tip of the iceberg. i could do a full hour history lesson and still not get half of what i want to say in. >> know yo

so the clinton campaign, as well as the trump campaign. so for robert mueller not to explore this really is in violation of what i would describe as counter intelligence 101, bret. >> all right. thank you, catherine. committee chairman adam schiff back in. the bob mueller hearing continues. >> director mueller, as a prosecutor, you would agree that if a witness or suspect lies or obstructs or tampers with witnesses or destroys evidence during an investigation, that generally that conduct can be used to show a consciousness of guilt? would you agree with that? >> yes. >> let's go through the different people associated with the trump campaign and this investigation who lied to you and other investigators to cover up their disloyal and unpatriotic conduct. if we could put exhibit 8 up. director mueller, i'm showing you campaign chairman paul manafort, roger stone, deputy campaign manager rick gates, national security adviser michael flynn, donald trump's personal attorney michael cohen and foreign policy adviser george papadapoulous. these six individuals

the conclusions weren't from robert mueller and they were written by hillary clinton's de facto legal team and represented some of her aides. so the mueller report is really going to be difficult for the democrats or anyone to rely upon the findings of a report when they just listen to the man whose name on top of it, not have a command of what was even in it. >> well, you know what a clown show for a guy like that to be attacking a marine hero, a guy that changed the fbi. he doesn't know what robert mueller did or didn't do. maybe he didn't give a type of performance that ratcliffe gave, screaming and humiliating himself. by the way, mika, ratcliffe was the guy who i think spurred a discussion here, if republicans are really -- i hate to call them that, a trump sycophant is going to call every democrat a socialist, can they call him a fascist? if they're going to mislabel them as socialists, then they should start calling ratcliffe a fascist and call him a fascist for the rest of his career until the fascist apologizes to capitalists who are democrats who he has mislabeled. so jonath

. >> claiming he had the dirt on the clinton campaign. >> robert mueller would not describe any part of their decisions about that underlying set of facts.. his reluctance to engage on that which may fit within the requirements of his office creates an opening for republicans because for this process, for republicans and those who support president trump, any set of questions or lack of answers they get from robert mueller on these underlying questions of fairness or any potential bias in this investigation give them politically. hold onto thai >> are those attram t major fins -- findings is the russians attempt to influence our election and attempts to obstruct justice by the president. >> they would not call them distractions. they would call them part of this record. they do create this other space for people who are sympathetic to the president can land on. in any encounter where law and politics are involved or in straight law, juries need a place to land. where do you help land the jury? republicans are trying to land republicans, sympathizers of the president. >> every one is

. >> it's robert mueller who decides whether or not he answers that question. you worked in the clintonuse. this is the first time that i've heard of house members practices, rehearsing before. what does that tell you? that you guys want to be ready for this and stay focused? >> i think it's great that members are taking it seriously and want to be prepared. look, the country has a huge national interest here. we spent a lot of time and taxpayer money on this. we need to get it right. i'm glad members are taking it seriously. i hope that that extends to both sides of the aisle and it's not agenda driven. i think if our agenda is to let the facts of this report get out, then that's a good agenda. if the other side is trying to tear down mr. mueller or to inject wild conspiracies into this, that's the wrong preparation. >> what's the best way to spend your five minutes or what's the message to your colleague? maybe fewer statements, more questions? >> thank you for saying that. anybody who's been trained as a lawyer knows you have to listen as well as talk. maybe some of the best question

clinton administration. ahead of special counsel robert mueller testifying early tomorrow morning, the justice department nowueller's lucky to be allowed to be testifying at all, implying that they never let this sort of thing happen with people who have jobs like robert mueller's. well, the jack danforth tape tells us that that's not true. but how else should we think of mueller's testimony tomorrow in terms of how it fits into history. joining us now is michael beschloss. thanks so much for being here. it's great to have you here tonight. >> thank you, rachel. >> i was struck by the justice department letting robert mueller know in this sort of terse letter that he is lucky to be allowed in there. there is precedence of special counsels testifying about their findings. >> absolutely. kenneth starr in 1998, a month before bill clinton was impeached by the house talking about the famous starr report which he had sent to congress and made public a couple of months earlier. and just as you were saying, jack danforth was not only testifying before congress, he was doing it even before his final report was issue

robert mueller on the stand? national security attorney bradley moss, clinton advisor mark penn and solicitor general of texas scottme to all of you. the day has come, jared huffman, democrat of california said this. it leaves us in a frustrating place, or democratic majority pinned a lot on mueller and his report. in retrospect we made some tactical mistakes. >> the movie didn't live up to the hype. sometimes the book is better. think about what we had with that report. 448 pages outlining in detail piece after piece, the entirety of the concern specifically on obstruction and getting beyond article 2 when it came to trying to get don began to recant test medical trying to get done began to produce false documentation, these were the obstructive acts that got outlined at the hearing. robert mueller is not hollywood central casting but the substantial information, what was needed did come out today. >> democrats pushed and thought for this, tug-of-war over whether they would see how it works, getting them to the hill, who was going to join him or wasn't going to join him. this is what they pushed war. >> the only i

robert mueller. i want to know i did look at russian influence in the clinton campaign. a week 'salary to ask in that one question. >> harris: really? >> david: russian influence in the clinton campaign. look what happened with fusion gps , et cetera. >> harris: house parent >> harris: house democrat impeachment fever seems to be on hold as they prer robert miller's testimony next week. as we talk about reportedly watching old videos of past testimony by the former fbi director and pouring over his 448-page report. the last democrat to publicly embrace an impeachment inquiry was joe kennedy the third three weeks ago. that was three days after the announcement that the former special counsel would head to the hill on july 17th. that hearing being billed as a make or break moment for democrats who have been pressing for the house to begin any impeachment inquiry into president trump. but lawmakers are beginning to raise alarms that they won't have enough time to press mueller. democrat david cicilline, who sits on the house judiciary committee, weighing in on that. saying,

is that the mueller report and its conclusions weren't from robert mueller, they were written what a lot of people believe was hillary clinton'seople that had supported her, even represented some of her aides. and so the mueller report is really going to be difficult for the democrats or anyone to rely upon the findings of a report when they just listened to the man whose name was on top of it not have a command of what was anytime. maria: the fact that you did have other people writing the report, do you think people understand that? andrew weissman was a hillary clinton donor, he was at her election party, right? >> it's not just andrew weissman. aaron zebley represented hillary clinton's aide who set up the upper and mashed her blackberries with a hammer. there were all sorts of folks, again, that were close to the clinton foundation and, you know, so the bias that was involved there, i think, are fair things to talk about. and i think that's why in light of the disastrous testimony from robert mueller, you know, the democrats paid a heavy price for bringing a reluctant witness to testify. they. played their hand -- they ov

robert mueller said he never heard of fusion gps, clinton dirty arm. >> juan: give it a break, jesse, come on. >> jesse: looks the other way, that is why people think this is rigged. >> juan: how many times did he say not in my purview? go ask people at justice, go ask intelligence agency, not what he was supposed to be looking at. >> jesse: russia interference covers collusion and americans conspiring and that is what the democrats did. >> juan: and the transition. >> kennedy: he had an opportunity to defend himself in the room today and we didn't see that. moving on, about to hear from top democrats reacting to robert mueller earlier today at the hearings. democrats honed in on their key issue. should president trump be charged with a crime over obstruction of justice? take a look at this. >> the president could be prosecuted for obstruction of justice crimes after he leaves office, true? >> correct. >> warrant a lot of time in jail if convicted? >> yes. >> why did the president of the united states want you fired? >> does ordering determination of the head of a criminal investigati