denied, if you will, somebody would reasonably feel there was a bias including robert mullen.ed for cause and is denying it and saying well, they just mentioned the text or the perception. the reality is if that was a widespread attitude at the fbi, we would be abolishing the fbi. i certainly hope there aren't too many peter strzoks there because somebody who can tell us under oath that this doesn't indicate at least some bias is somebody who then, when he spoke before jim jordan and others, can't be believed for his answers that, for example, he hadn't worked with fusion gps. brian: congressman, we know there are other people like peter strzok. some of them are unidentified. but have damning dialogue about donald trump, his intellect, his approach, his candidacy in the ig report and we haven't each gotten to the russian portion yet. >> well, this is what yesterday's hearing was about. we know peter strzok is a bad guy. we understanding is he not going to be at the center of the investigations where can he both clear hillary clinton and try to indict president trump again. but