through want to talk about a few of these historic events and how they've impacted the world today robert naiman is the policy director of just foreign policy he's in a van in illinois to help us to feed her into this there robert it's interesting how differently the mission is in libya is viewed some say things are just as bad today and others saying you know this was a success and one use of force is authorized under the arch u.p.a. doctrine and lives can be saved there should be more american action like libya in the future what's your take on these two very different interpretations one year later look to. examine whether. you have to have clarity and what you think all if the goal was to remove. who can contest there was a success if the goal is to protect civilians the question is a lot more murky it's certainly the intervention to begin to. protect the civilians that were killed by media or strays just the un report and last few days. and. it didn't protect the people who were killed when the civil war was exacerbated so the people who are most gung ho i think seeing those people whose mo

i'm joined now by robert naiman naman policy director for just foreign policy and i know robber you've done quite a bit of writing about this and i want to put up a poll for our viewers that you point to this this poll shows that forty two percent of israeli people living in israel support an attack on iran if the u.s. backs it but just nineteen percent of you israelis say they would support that attack if it's not approved by the u.s. and then thirty two percent of people in israel actually oppose an attack all together now the poll also found that people in israel believe that this would not be a short war if it did happen. shortly we're going to teach you a lesson or twenty nine percent say months twenty two percent say it would actually last two years and just eighteen percent say it would be days so robert it seems to me that this goes against this long standing argument that you know standing against the war with iran is standing against israel talk about that. you know very striking results in the poll conducted. shipley tommy of university of maryland and brookings in because s

that or is into their own hands but to give us a wrap up of the summit i was joined earlier by robert naiman policy director at just foreign policy i first ask when i first asked him if the bric countries could achieve more of a say in foreign affairs here's his take. well they've been pushing for more of a say for some time when they're already having more of a say then they did in the past one example of this is what's going on with the replacement of robert zelotes president of the world bank for the first time in history making three for being with one world bank with stablish we have an actual rapes with more than one candidate every president so no less an american nominated by the united states now for the first time there are three candidates or one one american doctor came back to jim kim. one colombian who is a combo. next year in science minister so that already is a big change in world history the fact that we had a contested race for the presidency of the world that you want to question the economics question security calls some of the brits seats on the security council. brazil

just want to talk about a few of these historic events and how they've impacted the world today robert naiman is the policy director with just foreign policy he joined us earlier today and i asked him about some of the differing views of the intervention of libya and its results there celtic will of course to. examine whether they need an employer's examples you have to have clearly and what you think. if the goal was to remove. who can contest it was a success the goal was to protect civilians the question is a lot more murky it certainly the intervention generally didn't. protect the civilians that were killed by media were strains just the un report and the last few weeks. it didn't care that people were killed when the civil war was exacerbated so the people who are most gone who i think saying that it was people who. were just overthrew of libyan government we saw the. war from what it was described before the united nations security council resolution which was protecting civilians to once the nearest intervene then then the goal was to overthrow gadhafi so he does the most important or

crimes and also i can add more investigation into nato's air campaign which killed one thousand robert naiman from a u.s. based foreign policy group believes foreign powers should have been held accountable long ago. in all these conflicts we have a pattern of the kind of pictures justice the in examining the war crimes on both sides of the conflict not just on libyan sides of the conflict but also to foreign sides of the conflict nato has never been held to account for the deaths of civilians in strikes in libya and many people said that this work in a military intervention is dangerous among other things to kill civilians it could lead to a breakup with mono no we were told though that i could never have been there would never be a breakup of the country well you know no no what we see and that you know the army . the arming of the external our new army has helped bring us to this point and coming up later this hour the uprising hailed as a win of democracy turns into a grab for power at any cost in kurdistan violence has become an answer go part of the democratic process with politicians e

and also recommended more investigation into nato air campaign which killed and wounded dozens robert naiman from the u.s. based just foreign policy group but he's foreign powers should have been held accountable long about. in all these conflicts we have a pattern of a kind of victor's justice the in examining the war crimes. also for the conflict include not just a libyan flag of the conflict but also the foreign sides of the conflict nato has never been held to account for the deaths of civilians or strikes in libya and many people said this western in a military intervention is dangerous among other things to kill civilians it could lead to a breakup you could go no no we were told no that i could never there would never be a breakup of the country well you know no no what we see and that you know the army . the arming of the external our new army the conflict has helped bring us to this point. now coming up later this hour here in our team the uprising hailed as a win of democracy turns into a grab for power at any cost in kyrgyzstan violence has become an integral part of the democrati

they're taking matters into their own hands and give us our grapple bogus on that i'm joined now by robert naiman policy director at just foreign policy welcome robert so these countries they are the five fastest growing economies and now they want more of a say in global affairs and they achieved it. well they've been pushing for more of a say for some time when they're already having more of a say then they did in the past one example of this is what's going on with the replacement of robert zelotes president of the world bank for the first time in history one hundred three for doing with one world bank we're establishing we haven't actually rates with more than one candidate every president so no less an american nominated by the united states now for the first time where you can a one one american dr kim kim kim. one globally who is a combo. negeri and mr so that already is a big change in the world history the fact that we have a contested race for the presidency of the world not just a question of economics it's also a question of security policy some of the birds seats on the security coun