i discuss this further we are joined live by robert naiman from the just foreign policy organization thanks for being with us here on our international so as we just heard the u.s. is expanding its low yield nuclear arsenal does this point to a strategic shift. well first of all this is a planning document so this isn't necessarily going to happen it's a troubling development that they would put this out but the administration doesn't get to do this by themselves congress will have to approve it and hopefully there will be pushback and what is. obvious lee and outrageous and foolish idea the united states already has more than enough nuclear weapons and. the idea. building more is foolish and dangerous and unnecessary and robbery of other priorities trump ran as a president or says all kind of thing but he talked about you know america first rebuild america people thought that you know we're going to fix the roads and bridges now we're going to build more nuclear weapons so i hope that this will be contested and this will not automatically have been just because the administration is

rid of them and the pentagon have declined to comment on the preliminary version of the document robert naiman from the just foreign policy campaign group thinks more nuclear weapons would be counterproductive. nobody really thinks that any sane person is going to use nuclear weapons in a strategic competition the point of having a thing if there is any point at all is you know so that the other person will be deterred supposedly against using your nuclear or up their nuclear weapons because then you might use yours how doing more nuclear weapons doesn't change that contractors are going to make money off of producing nuclear weapons so they'll create parochial interests there are pushing these things there are now something that's not in the interest of the world it's not in the interest of the majority. or. washington post bureau chief in beirut has faced a volley of criticism after posting a tweet praising the bravery of a journalist from free syrian t.v. it was quickly revealed though that reporter has links to extremist groups as r.t. if you want to start off reports everybody needs a her

weapons to secure vulnerable nuclear materials from terrorists and to reduce nuclear arsenals robert naiman from the just foreign policy organization told us the plans would mean a cash windfall for pentagon contractors. it's a troubling development that they would put this out but the administration doesn't get to do this by themselves congress will have to approve it and hopefully there will be pushback and what is. obviously an outrageous in foolish idea united states already has more than enough nuclear weapons the idea. building more is robbery other priorities pentagon contractors are going to make money. so that creates parochial interests there are pushing these things there are not something that's not in the interest of the world it's not in the interest of majority people. the european court of justice has prevented sweden from deporting a moroccan asylum seeker whom security services considered a potential terrorist swedish intelligence recommended the man's deportation after concluding of that he was a threat to national security individual whose name has not been released appe

of them well pentagon sais that they won't comment on the preliminary version of the document robert naiman from the just foreign policy campaign group he thinks more weapons won't actually strengthen washington's position or perhaps more importantly deter nuclear conflict at all nobody really. any sane person is going to use nuclear weapons industry dziedzic competition to the point of having a few if there is any point at all. you know so that the other person will be deterred supposedly using your nuclear or their nuclear weapons because then you might use yours how do you think more nuclear weapons doesn't change the pentagon contractors are going to make money off of losing the war weapons so they'll create parochial interests there are pushing these things there are now something that is not in the interest of the world is not only interested in the jury. or. another headline story not the washington post bureau chief in beirut has faced a volley of criticism after posting a tweet praising the bravery of a journalist from free syrian t.v. it was quickly revealed though that the report

weapons to secure vulnerable nuclear materials from terrorists and to reduce nuclear arsenals robert naiman from the just foreign policy organization told us the plans would mean a cash windfall for pentagon contractors. it's a troubling development that they would put this out but the administration doesn't get to do this by themselves congress will have to approve it and hopefully there will be pushed and what is. obviously end of rangers in foolish idea united states already has more than are not nuclear weapons the idea. building more is robbery other priority pentagon contractors are going to make money off of producing nuclear weapons so then create parochial interests there are pushing these things there are not something that's not in the interest of the world it's not in the interest of majority. the european court of justice has prevented sweden from deporting a moroccan asylum seeker whom security services considered a potential terrorist swedish intelligence recommended the man's deportation after concluding that he was a threat to national security the individual whose name has

weapons to get rid of the pentagon says it won't comment on the preliminary version of the document robert naiman from the just foreign policy campaign group thinks more weapons won't actually strengthen washington's position or deter a nuclear conflict nobody really thinks any sane person is going to use nuclear weapons in a strategic competition the point of having a few if there is any point at all is you know the other person will be deterred supposedly using your nuclear or their nuclear weapons because then you might use yours how doing more nuclear weapons doesn't change that contractors are going to make money off of losing their weapons so they create parochial interests there are pushing these things there are now something that's not in the interest of the world is not in the interest the majority. of. the washington post bureau chief in beirut has faced a volley of criticism after posting a tweet praising the bravery of a journalist from free syrian t.v. it was quickly revealed though that the report has links to extremist groups as you go to stuff reports everybody needs a hero even

weapons get rid of the pentagon says it won't comment on the polyphony version of the document but robert naiman from the just foreign policy campaign group told us that more usable weapons are unlikely to strengthen washington's powers of deterrence nobody really thinks any sane person is going to use nuclear weapons in a strategic competition the point of having these things if there is any or at all is you know so that the other person will be deterred supposedly using your nuclear at their nuclear weapons because then you might use yours having all nuclear weapons doesn't change that contractors are going to make money of producing a clear weapons so they'll create parochial interests there are pushing these things there are now something that is not in the interest of the world is not in the interest the majority. of. washington post bureau chief in beirut has faced a volley of criticism after posting a tweet praising the bravery of a journalist from free syrian t.v. it was quickly revealed though the reporter in fact has links to extremist groups as he goes down off reports everybody needs