and from on this we can cross live to civil rights attorney, robert patillo, thanks for being with us here on our international. thank you. so there's new usaid package. it's $40000000000.00. unlike previous ones that we have seen in the fact that it doesn't actually outlaw direct supplies to ukraine's neo nazi as a battalion kind of a big change there. what's your take? well, i think this is absolutely a mistake. we saw what happened then we, we have ghana staying were nearly $9000000000.00 a web re, i was left on the ground there. we have no tracking mechanism for where these weapons are going. whose hands it will go into. so not simply the battalion but the ices in the middle east, north african drug cartels they're working for the region will be able to buy on the black market. many of these highly advanced weapons systems that normally state or government and state actors have access to things that are going to be of national concern. or of course, not simply from engagement, but over the course of the next decade. see where these weapons end up. now robert, you touched on some t

s. sends, it's only supplies into unknown hands. civil rights attorney, robert patillo thinks that sending more weaponry to ukraine will further escalate the conflict. i feel that that's going to conflict significantly less understand that this has been a special military operation, despite the fact that the western call this the war for the last 2 months have been a very targeted spoken military operations. but as this continues to brag on, continuous support from the west of escalate, the situation were made break out into a full blown. what would you only benefit american defense contractors and not be creating people? what we're seeing right now is a proxy war, similar to what we saw on the vietnam war. what was on the korean war, where we would be using this as an opportunity to test you, russian military readiness, equipment, tactics, hardware, etc. so there is a battle going for there will be able to determine exactly what weapons attempt will be best to be within the policy of regime change the route the route, the middle east, and the last decade. so biden has recently said that h

and it's only supplies into unknown hands. civil rights attorney robert patillo thinks that sending more weaponry to ukraine will further escalate. the conflict as this continues to brag on a continuous support from the west end of escalate the situation where may break out into a full blown which can only benefit america, defense contractors are not be creating people. what we're seeing right now is a proxy war on commercial, we saw the vietnam war was on the korean war, where we would be 9 states since using this is the, as an opportunity to test you. russian military readiness, equipment, tactics, hardware, etc. so there is a battle going for and they will be able to determine exactly what weapons attempt will be best to be with seeing the policy of regime change the route the route, the middle east in the last decade. so bite has recently said that he will be putting, putting can not stay in power in russia, so they're making very clear what they are attempting to do. they want to find out exactly what the strengths and weaknesses are working military arch and how us weaponry will re

robert patillo civil rights attorney, thanks for being with us here. on our international interesting topic, sid least. thank you sort. and meanwhile, in europe, german chancellor of schultz has alleged rather than putin left berlin with no other choice than to continue arming ukraine. that's a stance shared by germany's top diplomat anela beard bark, who, who's not didn't approach to foreign policy and support for weaponry to give, has been feeling public discontent. i just didn't know better than the bareback was recently booed and pelted with agnes during a rally for her political party in the western german city of rupe. that's all, it's not the 1st time she has been criticized for what many c as a double standards over the ukraine war. as bare box green party has traditionally promoted pacifism, that principal does not seem to apply in the ukraine situation. as a foreign ministry firmly backs the supplies of weapons, jo, political experts, pierre emanuel thomas has expressed concern that the use arm supplies to ukraine could undermine the block, s

right now we heard from civil rights attorney, robert patillo, who says countries must attract any weapons. they supply to a foreign country to be sure to know in whose hands they end up. well, i think this is absolutely mistake. we saw what happened then we, we have ghana staying were nearly $9000000000.00 a web re i was left on the ground there. we have no tracking mechanism for where these weapons are going. whose hands it will go into the not simply the battalion but the ices in the middle east, north african drug cartels they're working for the region will be able to buy on the black market. many of these highly advanced weapons systems that normally say government and state actors have access to. so i think they're gonna be of national concern on the course, not simply the firm engagement, but over the course of the next decade and see where these weapons end up have real questions as to exactly where they, why we're providing this level of assistance. what are the strategic goals and advantages here up, we just got out of 20 years of war in the united states of america is mere littl

and and even frightening scale civil rights lawyer roberts patillo fears the such actions will only prolong the conflict when we don't know how far this will go as starts the conversation of property. it could turn into the rounding up imprisonment of pro russian quote unquote, individuals they are in the ukraine military tribunals or even concentration camps . but what we've seen over the course of the past decade have been efforts by the ukranian government at the house to the west to remove russian. any russian connection from the ukraine with the support of the continued whenever, by the ukrainian government to spam this conflict in hopes of drawing in western nations to make this a broader conflict. but it's been to clear policy and it went to the government to try to direct the russian eyes much of ukraine. and i think this was talking much of these tensions. meanwhile, as fighting continues the all steel pon scenario, polanko respondent has visited the abundant military bases of the ukrainian forces located in the city. the facilities were played of mines just days ago. as eager as d

and, and even frightening scale, while civil rights lawyer, robert patillo fears the such, actions will only prolong the conflicts of your ukrainian, the you, for as far as any pro russian or any, something's or even understanding what the russian special operation is. they are in the eastern part of ukraine. any, any disagreement? what the 1st in line from the government is, can result you losing every part of you, of everything that you work for. and we don't know how far this will go. it starts the conversational property. it could turn into the rounding up imprisonment of pro russian quote unquote, individuals they are in the ukraine military tribunals or even concentration camps . but what we've seen over the course of the past decade have been efforts by the ukranian government and the house to the west. to remove russian. any russian connection from the ukraine, which on 2012, the russian language law, which went into effect that ought to take away to be used the russian language and official documents with all of the expansion of this in 2019 and even in 2021. so i think that is