i addressed it to robert reuben, who was, who was name chairman of the board the next day. and i also sent it to the major executives, the chief auditor, the chief financial officer, the chief risk officer. and i told him the story about how he'd been if, when warnings for a year and a half. wow. because i knew under sarbanes oxley, i knew they were legally bound to tell the board can tell investors that there was this fraudulent activity going on. well, i, uh, i got their attention. all right. i subsequently to not to come back to the bank. and this was not a fun time in my life, i imagine not going back to that period. you were clearly a detail person. you were looking at the numbers, the charge, the graphs, the complicated data related not just the economy, of course, but to the banks holdings and loans. you saw this troubling pattern. you went to the banks, executives about it. and the reaction then was well at the beginning to just ignore you. why is it, why is it that they chose to ignore you? because obviously they have access to the same kind of information that you

i addressed it to robert reuben, who was was name chairman of the board the next day. and i also sent it to the major executives, the chief auditor, the chief financial officer, the chief risk officer. and i told them the story about how it been if, when warnings for a year and a half. wow. because i knew under sarbanes oxley, i knew they were legally bound to tell the board can count investors that those as fraudulent activity going on. well, it's a, uh, i got their attention, all right. i subsequently not to come back to the bank and this was not a fun time in my life. i imagine not going back to that period. you were clearly a detail person. you were looking at the numbers, the charge, the graphs, the complicated data related not just the economy, of course, but to the banks holdings and loans. you saw this troubling pattern. you went to the banks, executives about it. and the reaction then was well at the beginning to just ignore you. why is it, why is it that they chose to ignore you? because obviously they have access to the same kind of information that you had.

roberts is recommending. >> josh gerstein thank you for your reporting this morning. >>> a few more stories to get to. former house speaker nancy pelosi will headline a fund-raiser for reuben giaga tomorrow as he campaigns for the seat held by kyrsten sinema. pelosi has not formerly endorsed him, but kyrsten sinema left the democratic party and registered as an independent late last year, days after democrats reached a slim 51-49 majority in the senate. she has not said whether she will run for re-election in 2024. giago a four-term congressman and retired marine has been critical of kyrsten sinema and announced a bid for her seat in january. the arizona senate race is one of many that determines which party controls the senate next year. >>> a new department of justice report said misconduct at the correctional facility in new york allowed jeffrey epstein to die by suicide. they failed to monitor ep seen the every 30 minutes as required and lied about it. he was allowed extra clothing in his cell. and the prison failed to make sure he had a cell mate as recommended. two were criminally charged. >>> and ryan sea crest is set to take over wheel of fortune, replacing pat saj

robert fox from the evening standard there. now the prince of wales is expected to unveil a major homelessness major campaign on homelessness later month. reubenv— marking the seven year anniversary of the brexit referendum,— anniversary of the brexit referendum, which you believe vett— referendum, which you believe veht tata— referendum, which you believe well, data from _ referendum, which you believe well, data from yougov's latest treet— well, data from yougov's latest treat etrvev— well, data from yougov's latest brexit survey finding 58.2% of teete— brexit survey finding 58.2% of teette hh— brexit survey finding 58.2% of people in britain— brexit survey finding 58.2% of people in britain would now vote to people in britain would now vote te rejoin— people in britain would now vote te retehh hh— people in britain would now vote te rerehh hh ee— people in britain would now vote to rejoin in so well— people in britain would now vote to rejoin in so well over half 58.2.— to rejoin in so well over half tee-h se— to rejoin in so well over half now 58.2. so as— to rejoin in so well over half now 58.2. so as brexit failed, eetht— now 58.2. so as