public citizens robert weissman is sounding the alarm. plus, a new way for doctors to search for cancer and a many nation army of prosecutors bust a cyber raid. that's this week on "press: here." ♪♪ >>> good morning, everyone. i'm scott mcgrew. if you google best noise-canceling headphones for long flights you will get a long list of websites with that information. now some are ads, but others are links to dependable websites like wire cutter or cnet or travel & leisure. if you ask the same question of chatgpt it just gives you the answer. it says the model by sony is best followed by bose quiet comfort so ai got that answer probably from the same websites, wire cutter, cnet and travel & leisure, but those websites get none of the credit and none of the eyes on their ads and no link affiliate, money or anything else. robert weissman is the president of public service and while he doesn't stay up at night thinking about wire cutters, private citizen sent this letter to the federal trade commission and the doj and chairs of the house and an

but robert weissman, the president of consumer advocacy group, public citizen says that that's not enough positive step as a recognized. the problem. >> it's a positive step. they're going to say they're going to do the best they can, but the best they can right now is not good enough about 2 dozen companies including google, meta and microsoft at an international security conference last week. >> promise to adopt, quote, reasonable precautions to both detect and label political deepfakes strategy that relies on big tech to police's no strategy at weisman and public citizen are calling for federal action to ban political deepfakes. it's hugely concerning. virginia senator mark warner agrees. congress needs to step up before democracy pays the price. i continue to worry that. we may be looking at the perfect storm in terms of foreign interference in our elections this the white house is promising to roll out its own tool to flag deepfakes online in washington. raquel martin. still ahead tonight on kron 4 news at 6 mammal vans still making a difference. how mobile mammogram vans have been h

but robert weissman, the president of consumer advocacy group, public citizen says that that's not enough. it's a positive step as a recognized. the problem. >> it's a positive step. they're going o say they're going to do the best they can, but the best they can right now is not good enough about 2 dozen companies including google, meta and microsoft at an international security conference last week. >> promise to adopt, quote, reasonable precautions to both detect and label political deepfakes strategy that relies on big tech to sa police's no strategy at all. weisman and public citizen are calling for federal action to ban political deepfakes. it's hugely concerning. virginia senator mark warner agrees. congress needs to step up before democracy pays the price. i continue to worry that. we may be looking at the perfect storm in terms of foreign interference in our elections this the white house is promising to roll out its own tool to flag deepfakes online in washington. raquel martin. >> these were bay area residents trying to confront president biden as he left the for amman hotel in

public citizens robert weissman is sounding the alarm.many nation army of prosecutors bust a cyber raid. that's this week on "press:

joining us now, msnbc legal analyst, former federal prosecutor and senior member of robert mueller's probe, andrew weissman in "the new york times," david french writes that according to precedent, a stay is granted only when one, there's a reasonable probability, easy for me to say, that four justices would agree that issues in this case are sufficiently meritorious for the court to take the case. number two, that there is a significant possibility of reversal of the lower court's decision and three, there's a likelihood that irreparable harm will result if that decision is not stayed. so, if that is the standard or precedent, in your opinion, does this case meet that standard for a stay? >> of course, it doesn't. the issue of whether the supreme court would take this case because they're thinking of reversing the d.c. circuit seems highly unlikely. remember, what donald trump argued there was that he should be free to kill political opponents as long as he's president at the time. and so long as he's not successfully impeached. he's free to do essentially whatever he wants. that argument is never going t